Performance Areas
Levels of Performance
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 |
|
|
|
|
Levels of Performance
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 |
|
|
|
|
Levels of Performance
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 |
|
|
|
|
If all teachers in a school were consistently performing at Level 3, the school would be excellent for all students.
Levels of Performance
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 |
|
|
|
|
Core Teacher Skills
A Core Teacher Skill is…
A Core Teacher Skill is not…
Performance Area 1
Learning Environment:
To what extent does the classroom environment support all students to learn?
Indicator 1.1
Structures for Learning
Indicator 1.2
Positive Classroom Climate
Indicator 1.3
Equitable Access
Equitable:
What one needs based on their diverse needs related to background knowledge / experiences; language; ability; etc.
Indicator 1.3
Equitable Access
Key Messages:
This is important.
You can do it.
I won’t give up on you.
Indicator 1.3
Equitable Access
1.3 Equitable Access:
Strategies
Performance Area 1: Learning Environment
Core Teacher Skills
Performance Area 2
Engagement in Learning:
To what extent does the instruction support and engage all students?
Indicator 2.1
Objectives for Learning
“… getting students to understand what the objective is, which requires far more than writing it on the board.”
(Brookhart & Moss, 2014)
Objectives for learning:
Indicator 2.1
Objectives for Learning
Revisiting Objectives
Indicator 2.1
Objectives for Learning
Indicator 2.2
Learning Experiences
Logically Aligned
Logically aligned means to consider:
Indicator 2.2
Learning Experiences
Explanatory Devices
Analogies
Imagery
Think Aloud
Graphic Organizers
Experiences
Highlighting Important Information
Examples / Non-examples
Pictures / Visuals
Diagrams
Charts
Models/modeling
Role plays
Games
Models/modeling
Indicator 2.2
Learning Experiences
Indicator 2.3
Checks for Understanding
and Feedback
Checks for understanding…
Indicator 2.3
Checks for Understanding
and Feedback
Performance Area 2: Engagement in Learning
Core Teacher Skills
Performance Area 3
Maximizing Learning:
To what extent do all students retain and apply their learning?
Indicator 3.1
Rigorous Assignments
“Assignments - tasks that integrate content knowledge, skills, and thinking strategies learned in a lesson or unit - are the artifacts of student understanding.”
-Keith Dysarz, Education Trust
Indicator 3.1
Rigorous Assignments
Application of Content…
Display Mastery
Reviewing Material
Leading Discussions
Critically Analyzing Information
Solving Problems
Generating Examples
3.1 Rigorous Assignments
Key Aspects
Aligned
Major CCS content standard(s) are addressed
Aligned to the lesson learning goals
Task(s) are clearly articulated
Cognitively Challenging
Requires high levels of cognitive demand
Some level of writing output is required
Relevant and Meaningful
Students have choice in one of the following: content, product, process of equal rigor
Task is relevant and includes real-world materials and/or allows for students to connect their experiences, goals, interests, and/or values
Differentiated and Supported
Supports are varied and matched to students
2.2 Learning Experience vs
3.1 Rigorous Assignments
Learning Experience | | Rigorous Assignments |
More likely to be teacher directed-demonstration, video, listening to presentation, cooperative pairs practicing, gallery walk, etc. | | More likely to be done independently-writing a narrative paragraph, using a graphic organizer to extract information from a text, creating a diet plan for health |
Used to expose and guide students to access new knowledge | | Used to allow students to apply new knowledge, practice skills, extend understanding |
Used to build understanding of each piece of information required to know to understand the overall objective | | Used to apply all learned pieces of knowledge related to the overall objective and big understanding |
Relevance for learning the new information is built into the experience; considers students interests, background knowledge, ability | | Relevance in terms of real-world application |
Example: Pairs put puzzles together, teacher gave explanations, teacher model how to use context clues to determine “what makes sense?” | | Example: Ss use their new knowledge to identify a homonym and the context clues that helped them determine which meaning made sense. |
2.2 Learning Experience vs
3.1 Rigorous Assignments
Learning Experience | | Rigorous Assignments |
More likely to be teacher directed-demonstration, video, listening to presentation, cooperative pairs practicing, gallery walk, etc. | | More likely to be done independently-writing a narrative paragraph, using a graphic organizer to extract information from a text, creating a diet plan for health |
Used to expose and guide students to access new knowledge | | Used to allow students to apply new knowledge, practice skills, extend understanding |
Used to build understanding of each piece of information required to know to understand the overall objective | | Used to apply all learned pieces of knowledge related to the overall objective and big understanding |
Relevance for learning the new information is built into the experience; considers students interests, background knowledge, ability | | Relevance in terms of real-world application |
Example: Pairs put puzzles together, teacher gave explanations, teacher model how to use context clues to determine “what makes sense?” | | Example: Ss use their new knowledge to identify a homonym and the context clues that helped them determine which meaning made sense. |
Indicator 3.2
Questioning and Discussion
CFU vs. Q&D
Check for Understanding | Questioning and Discussion |
To check knowledge obtained | To develop thinking power and ability to deepen understanding |
To focus students on objectives and procedures | To encourage elaboration on a topic |
To review previous learning | To invite creative thinking |
To help clarify new learning | To help students become better metacognitive, strategic learners |
Consolidate and review learning experiences | To make students’ thinking visible |
Feedback is provided to indicate progress towards goal/objective | |
CFU vs. Q&D
Check for Understanding | Questioning and Discussion |
To check knowledge obtained | To develop thinking power and ability to deepen understanding |
To focus students on objectives and procedures | To encourage elaboration on a topic |
To review previous learning | To invite creative thinking |
To help clarify new learning | To help students become better metacognitive, strategic learners |
Consolidate and review learning experiences | To make students’ thinking visible |
Feedback is provided to indicate progress towards goal/objective | |
Indicator 3.3�Academic Language �and Vocabulary
Tier 1: Basic Vocabulary
Very frequent in English language
Does not require formal instruction for most students
Examples: big, clock, baby, walk
Tier 2: Advanced Vocabulary
Infrequent and not easily gained in general context
General in nature and important to the English language
Used across content areas-requires more formal instruction
CCSS language
Examples: navigate, identify, hypothesis
Tier 3: Advanced Vocabulary
Very infrequent
Subject-matter specific
Not used in the general use of language
Example: cellular response
Tier 2 and 3 are Both Considered Academic Language and Vocabulary
Indicator 3.3�Academic Language �and Vocabulary
Is….
Is Not….
Indicator 3.3
Academic Language
and Vocabulary
Performance Area 3: Maximizing Learning
Core Teacher Skills