NEW ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS�(TARGET SPECIFIC ANTICOAGULANTS)
BY
MOHAMED ISMAEIL, MD
DISCLAIMER
Today’s speaker did not receive financial support from nor have any commercial relationship with any drug or equipment product manufacturers or vendors that may be mentioned or displayed in the course of the presentation.
There is NO mention of off label use of equipment or medications mentioned in this presentation.
OBJECTIVES
1- Physiology of hemostasis and coagulation
2-Pharmacological aspects of new oral anticoagulants
3- Impact of the new oral anticoagulants on anesthesia practice
4-Management of complications related to the new oral anticoagulants
WHY PATIENTS USE OR WILL USE ANTICOAGULANTS?
Mechanical heart valves.
Cardiac arrhythmias.
Prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism and other thromboembolic events which are commonly associated with surgical procedures.
Treatment of acute thromboembolic events
CONSEQUENCES OF THROMBUS
consequences
angina
Myocardial infaction
stroke
Deep venous thrombosis
HEMOSTASIS
HEMOSTASIS
HEME= BLOOD
STASIS= TO HALT
PROCESS OF RETAINING BLOOD WITHIN THE VASCULAR SYSTEM
REPAIRS INJURY TO BLOOD VESSELS
STOPS OR PREVENTS BLOOD LOSS
COMPONENTS OF HEMOSTASIS
Vascular System
Platelet System
Coagulation System
Fibrinolytic System
Coagulation Inhibition System
HEMOSTASIS
Vessel Injury
Platelet
Activation
Platelet
aggregation
Blood Vessel
Constriction
Coagulation
Activation
Stable Hemostatic Plug
Fibrin clot
Reduced
Blood flow
Tissue Factor
Primary hemostatic plug
Neural
Steps in Hemostasis
A. Vasoconstriction
B. Primary hemostasis (Platelet plug formation)
C. Secondary hemostasis (Fibrin clot formation)
D. Clot Retraction
E. Clot Dissolution
A. VASOCONSTRICTION
B. Primary Hemostasis: Platelets
latelet
adhesion
vWF
C. Secondary Hemostasis: The Clotting Mechanism
COAGULATION
Coagulation is a complex process by which blood forms clots.
Coagulation begins almost instantly after an injury to the blood vessel has damaged the endothelium (lining of the vessel).
COAGULATION
ENZYMATIC COAGULATION FACTORS
Factor Common Name
Number
I Fibrinogen
II Prothrombin
III Tissue Factor
IV Ca2+
Va Proaccelerin
VII Proconvertin
VIII Antihemophilic Factor
IX Christmas Factor
X Stuart Factor
XI Plasma thromboplastin antecedent
XII Hageman factor
XIII Fibrin Stabilizing Factor
COAGULATION FACTORS
FACTORS | PLASMA t ½ (hrs) |
Fibrinogen (I) | 72-120 |
Prothrombin (II) | 60-70 |
V | 12-16 |
VII | 3-6 |
VIII | 8-12 |
IX | 18-24 |
X | 30-40 |
FACTORS | PLASMA t ½ (hrs) |
XI | 52 |
XII | 60 |
Protein C | 6 |
Protein S (total) | 42 |
Tissue factor | -- |
Thrombomodulin | -- |
antithrombin | 72 |
Roberts HR, et al. Current Concepts for Hemostasis. Anesthesiology 2004;100:3. 722-30.
|
SECONDARY HEMOSTASIS�THE COAGULATION CASCADE
The coagulation cascade of secondary hemostasis has two pathways:
CLOTTING CASCADE
AJHP 2004;61:S7.
THE NEW MODEL OF COAGULATION
Initiation phase
Amplification phase
Propagation phase
ANTICOAGULANTS
Although tissue breakdown and platelets destruction are normal events in the absence of trauma, intravascular clotting does not usually occur because:
NATURAL ANTICOAGULANTS
Antithrombin III – inhibits factor X and thrombin
Heparin from basophils and mast cells potentiates effects of antithrombin III (together they inhibit IX, X, XI, XII and thrombin)
Antithromboplastin –inhibits tissue factor (tissue thromboplastins)
Protein C and S – activated by thrombin; degrade factor Va and VIIIa
ATIII
Clotting Factors
Tissue factor
PAI-1
Antiplasmin
TFPI
Protein C
Protein S
Procoagulant
Anticoagulant
Fibrinolytic System
ANTICOAGULANTS
DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY �CURRENT FDA APPROVED ANTICOAGULANTS
1930s
Heparin
1950s
1990s
2002
1970s
Warfarin
LMWHs
Factor Xa inhibitor
DTIs
Argatroban
Bivalirudin
Lepirudin
Fondaparinux
Enoxaparin
Dalteparin
Tinzaparin
1980s
2010-12
DTI and
Factor Xa
inhibitors
Dabigatran
Rivaroxaban
Apixaban
Blood Vessel Injury
IX
IXa
XI
XIa
X
Xa
XII
XIIa
Tissue Injury
Tissue Factor
VIIa
VII
X
Prothrombin
Thrombin
Fibrinogen
Fibrin monomer
Fibrin polymer
XIII
First generation Anticoagulants
Factors affected
By Heparin
Vit. K dependent Factors
Affected by Oral Anticoagulants
SECOND AND EMERGING THERAPIES
New anticoagulant drugs
DISADVANTAGE OF FIRST GENERATIONS ANTICOAGULANTS
COMPLICATIONS OF FIRST GENERATION ANTICOAGULANTS
Bleeding
New Thrombosis
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Osteoporosis
Warfarin skin necrosis
Warfarin embryopathy
Slow onset of action
Needs regular monitoring
Interaction with food
Interacts with medications
Difficult titration-regular dose adjustments
THE IDEAL ORAL ANTICOAGULANT
Require no remote monitoring
Have little interaction with food or other drugs
Broad therapeutic window
Offer a good safety profile with regard to bleeding risk
Have similar efficacy to warfarin in reducing thromboembolic events
Reach therapeutic levels within several hours
Oral and/or IV administration
Ability to inhibit free and clot bound thrombin
Availability of an antidote
Easily reversible
Affordable (acceptable cost-benefit ratio)
NEW TERMINOLOGY
BACKGROUND
38
TSOACS VS. WARFARIN
DIRECT THROMBIN INHIBITION
VIIa
Xa
IXa
XIa
XIIa
Tissue factor
Factor IIa�(thrombin)
Dabigatran
II
×
DABIGATRAN
DABIGATRAN
DABIGATRAN
No significant food-drug interaction
Not metabolized by P450 Isoenzymes
Few drug-drug interactions (amiodarone, quinidine, verapamil )
dose once daily
Approved for
No monitoring is required
NOT for use in patients with artificial valves
Approved in Europe and Canada for orthopedic prophylaxis
DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE CLINICAL TRIALS
TRIAL | PATIENT POPULATION | DOSING | COMPARATOR | OUTCOME | RESULTS |
VTE PREVENTION | |||||
RE-NOVATE | THR | 150 or 220mg qday (28-35 days) | Enox 40mg qday | VTE + all cause mortality | Non-inferior |
RE-MODEL | TKR | 150 or 220mg qday (6-10 days) | Enox 40mg qday | Non-inferior | |
RE-MOBILIZE | TKR | 150 or 220mg qday (12-15 days) | Enox 30mg bid | Failed to achieve noninferiority | |
STROKE PREVENTION | |||||
RE-LY | AFIB | 110 or 150mg bid | Warfarin (INR 2-3) | Stroke or systemic embolism | 150mg (superior) 110mg (non-inferior) |
DABIGATRAN SAFETY
Trial | Patient population | Dosing | Comparator | Outcome | Results | |
VTE PREVENTION | ||||||
RE-NOVATE | THR | 150 or 220mg qday (28-35 days) | Enox 40mg qday | Major Bleeding | 2.0% (220mg) 1.3% (150mg) vs. 1.6% | |
RE-MODEL | TKR | 150 or 220mg qday (6-10 days) | Enox 40mg qday | 1.5% (220mg) 1.3% (150mg) vs. 1.3% | ||
RE-MOBILIZE | TKR | 150 or 220mg qday (12-15 days) | Enox 30mg bid | 0.6% (220mg) 0.6% (150mg) vs. 1.4% | ||
STROKE PREVENTION | ||||||
RE-LY | AFIB | 110 or 150mg bid | Warfarin (INR 2-3) | Major Bleeding | 3.11% (150mg) 2.71%(110mg)* vs. 3.36% | |
DIRECT FACTOR XA INHIBITION
VIIa
Xa
IXa
XIa
XIIa
Tissue factor
Fibrinogen
Fibrin clot
Factor II�(prothrombin)
Rivaroxaban
Apixaban
Edoxaban
×
RIVAROXABAN
RIVAROXABAN
RIVAROXABAN CLINICAL TRIALS
TRIAL | PATIENT | DOSING | COMPARATOR | OUTCOME | RESULTS |
RECORD 1 | THR | 10mg qday (31-39 days) | Enox 40mg qday | Composite VTE and all cause mortality | Riva 1.1% Enox 3.7% p<0.001 (sup) |
RECORD 2 | THR | 10mg qday (31-39 days) | Enox 40mg qday (10-14 days) | Riva 2% Enox 9.3% p<0.001 (sup) | |
RECORD 3 | TKR | 10mg qday (10-14 days) | Enox 40mg qday | Riva 9.6% Enox 18.9% p=0.012 (sup) | |
RECORD 4 | TKR | 10mg qday (10-14 days) | Enox 30mg bid | Riva 6.9% Enox 10.1% p<0.001 (sup) |
RIVAROXABAN SAFETY
Thromb Haemost 2010: 103:572-585
TRIAL | PATIENT | DOSING | COMPARATOR | OUTCOME | RESULTS |
RECORD 1 | THR | 10mg qday (31-39 days) | Enox 40mg qday | Major Bleeding | Riva 0.3% Enox 0.1% p=0.18 |
RECORD 2 | THR | 10mg qday (31-39 days) | Enox 40mg qday (10-14 days) | Riva 0.1% Enox 0.1% p=1.00 | |
RECORD 3 | TKR | 10mg qday (10-14 days) | Enox 40mg qday | Riva 0.6% Enox 0.5% p=0.79 | |
RECORD 4 | TKR | 10mg qday (10-14 days) | Enox 30mg bid | Riva 0.7% Enox 0.3% p=0.31 |
APIXABAN
APIXABAN CLINICAL TRIALS
Thromb Haemost 2010: 103:572-585
Trial | Patients | Dosing | Comparator | Outcome | Results |
ADVANCE-1 | TKR | 2.5mg BID (10-14 days) | Enox 30mg bid | Total VTE + all cause mortality | API 9.0% Enox 8.8% Non-Inferiority not met |
| | | | Bleeding | API 5.3% Enox 6.6% |
ADVANCE-2 | TKR | 2.5mg BID (10-14 days) | Enox 40mg qday | Total VTE + all cause mortality | Api 15.1% Enox 24.4% p=0.001 |
| | | | Bleeding | Api 3.5% Enox 4.8% p=0.09 |
TSOAS
Thromb Haemost 2010: 103:572-585
J Thromb Thrombolysis 2013;36:133-140.
NEW ANTICOAGULANTS
Benefits
Problems
MONITORING
Requires understanding of the available coagulation tests
Should not be done “routinely” but limited to clinical situations a specific goal in mind
Presently – do not quantitatively assess the degree of anticoagulation but can make a qualitative assessment
MONITORING
van Ryn et al. Thromb Haemost 2010;103:1116-1127.
MONITORING
van Ryn et al. Thromb Haemost 2010;103:1116-1127.
For DTIs - ECT is the best lab monitor – not widely available/not FDA approved
Chromogenic anti-factor II – FDA approved but not for monitoring DTIs
Thrombin time is too sensitive
MONITORING
Limited data a best are available for rivaroxaban and apixaban for monitoring or reversal
Rivaroxaban and Apixaban influences
Rivaroxaban and apixaban should be able to be monitored by chromogenic Anti-Xa assays
Standards have not been set/reported
MONITORING GUIDELINES
J Thromb Thrombolysis 2013;36:187-194.
CLINICAL SITUATION RELATED TO NEW ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS
Time to discontinue and start the NOAs
Bleeding Issues and its management
Regional anesthesia, what we do
PRE-PROCEDURE INTERRUPTION OF THE NOAS
PRE-PROCEDURAL INTERRUPTION
J Thromb Thrombolysis 2013;36:212-222.
Levy JH, Key NS, Azran MS. Novel oral anticoagulants: implications in the perioperative setting. Anesthesiology 2010;113:726-45.
PRE-PROCEDURAL INTERRUPTION
Cleve Clin J Med 2013;80:443-451.
Hall R, Mazer CD. Antiplatelet drugs: a review of their pharmacology and management in the perioperative period. Anesth Analg 2011;112:292-318.
Bridging algorithm for vitamin K antagonists and new oral anticoagulants.
Gallego P et al. Circulation 2012;126:1573-1576
Copyright © American Heart Association
Editorial, Circulation, September 2012 vol. 126 no. 13 1573-1576
Bridging algorithm for vitamin K antagonists and new oral anticoagulants.
'New' direct oral anticoagulants in the perioperative setting.
Breuer, Georg; Weiss, Dominik; Ringwald, Juergen
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 27(4):409-419, August 2014.
'New' direct oral anticoagulants in the perioperative setting.
Breuer, Georg; Weiss, Dominik; Ringwald, Juergen .Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 27(4):409-419, August 2014.
PRE-OP MANAGEMENT�(EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE)
If surgery cannot be delayed, there is an increased risk of bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulants.
Risk of bleeding should be weighed against the urgency of intervention.
Discontinue drugs minimum 1 to 2 days (CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min)
Patients with the highest risk of bleeding hold for 2-4 days
major surgery, spinal puncture, or placement of a spinal or epidural catheter or port, in whom complete hemostasis may be required
CrCl< 50 mL/min hold 2 to 5 days before elective invasive or surgical procedures
van Ryn et al. Thromb Haemost 2010;103:1116-1127.
BRIDGING OR NO BRIDGING
BRIDGING DECISION
Does AC need interrupted?
Is bridging required (risk assessment)?
Anticoagulation Intensity
RISK STRATIFICATION FOR BLEEDING
High bleeding-risk surgeries/procedures include:
SUGGESTED RISK STRATIFICATION: MECHANICAL HEART VALVES
High Risk
Moderate Risk
Low Risk
Copyright: American College of Chest Physicians 2012©
SUGGESTED RISK STRATIFICATION: ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
High Risk
Moderate Risk
Low Risk
N.B. Individual patient characteristics (eg, prior embolic stroke or perioperative stroke/TIA) may override suggested risk stratification
Copyright: American College of Chest Physicians 2012©
SUGGESTED RISK STRATIFICATION: VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM
High Risk
Moderate Risk
Low Risk
Copyright: American College of Chest Physicians 2012©
BRIDGING PROTOCOL
Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2011;104:669-676.
Copyright: American College of Chest Physicians 2012©
BLEEDING
MANAGING BLEEDING
Hold the drug
Local hemostatic measures
Supportive PRBC/PLT transfusions
Initiate a hematology consult early
Institutional protocols are recommended
MANAGING BLEEDING
Maintain adequate diuresis given renal elimination
With overdose – when given within 1-2 hours of ingestion activated charcoal can adsorb dabigatran (in vitro data)
Protamine sulfate and vitamin K should not be expected to affect the anticoagulant activity
Specific reversal agents (“antidotes”) not yet available
MANAGING BLEEDING
Dabigatran can be dialyzed with removal of about 60% of drug over 2-3 hrs.
Rivaroxaban is not expected to be dialyzable (high plasma protein binding).
Consider transfusion of fresh frozen plasma, platelets or red blood cells for supportive management
FRESH FROZEN PLASMA
There are no studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) for reversal of NOACs.
In a recent case report, administration of FFP in conjunction with recombinant activated factor VII (rVIIa) was ineffective at restoring hemostasis in a patient with dabigatran-associated epidural hematoma and spinal cord compression following traumatic injury .
FFP reduced the volume of intracerebral hemorrhage in mice receiving high-dose dabigatran, without an effect on mortality.
High-dose FFP only partially reversed the prolonged PT induced by edoxaban in a rat model.
FFP administration is associated with increased risk of circulatory overload, transfusion-related acute lung injury, allergic reactions and infection.
DILUTION IS INEVITABLE WHEN GIVING�BLOOD COMPONENTS
80
Whole blood 500 mL
(Hct 38%–50%; PLTs 150K–400K; Plasma coagulation activity 100%)
1 U PRBC
(335 mL, Hct 55%)
1 U Plasma
(275 mL, coagulation activity 80%)
1 U PLTs
(50 mL, 5.5 x 1010 PLTs
150 mL anticoagulant added; centrifuged
Patient Receives 650 mL fluid:
Hct 29%, PLTs 88K, 65% coagulation activity
Adapted from Dutton RP. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27(9 pt 2):85S–92S.
MANAGING BLEEDING
Some evidence supports use of activated prothrombin complex concentrates (FEIBA) for rivaroxaban, recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven) for dabigatran or concentrates of coagulation factors II, IX, or X (PCC) but data are limited.
4-factor PCC recently approved in the US.
Always concerns about the “potentially” prothrombotic state created with bypassing agents.
Xa recombinant reversing agent is under investigation. Phase II data was encouraging
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA
TSOACS AND NEURAXIAL ANESTHESIA
Recent guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine recommend that TSOACs be stopped for 2–4 days (depending on which of the 3 was used) prior to initiation of neuraxial anesthesia
These guidelines recommend against use of a TSOAC while a catheter is in place if possible, or to delay removal of a catheter until the anticoagulant effect is minimal
Last application of a NOAC before neuraxial anesthesia
'New' direct oral anticoagulants in the perioperative setting. Breuer, Georg; Weiss, Dominik; Ringwald, Juergen. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 27(4):409-419, August 2014.
Baron TH, Kamath PS, McBane RD. Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing invasive procedures. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2113-24.
Connolly G, Spyropoulos AC. Practical issues, limitations, and periprocedural management of the NOAC's. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2013;36:212-22.
Liew A, Douketis J. Perioperative management of patients who are receiving a novel oral anticoagulant. Intern Emerg Med 2013;8:477-84.
Gogarten W, Vandermeulen E, Van Aken H, Kozek S, Llau JV, Samama CM; European Society of Anaesthesiology. Regional anaesthesia and antithrombotic agents: recommendations of the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:999-1015.
Recommendations for neuroaxial anesthesia if NOAs administered for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis
| Dabigatran | Rivaroxaban | Apixaban |
Time between epidural anesthetic technique and next anticoagulant dose | 2-4 h | 4-6 h | 6h |
Time before last anticoagulant dose and epidural catheter removal | NR | 22-26h | 26-30h |
Time between removal of epidural catheter and next anticoagulant dose | 6h | 4-6h | 4-6h |
'New' direct oral anticoagulants in the perioperative setting. Breuer, Georg; Weiss, Dominik; Ringwald, Juergen. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 27(4):409-419, August 2014.
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA
Anesthesiology 2013;118:1466-1474.
THANK YOU