1 of 87

NEW ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS�(TARGET SPECIFIC ANTICOAGULANTS)

BY

MOHAMED ISMAEIL, MD

2 of 87

DISCLAIMER

Today’s speaker did not receive financial support from nor have any commercial relationship with any drug or equipment product manufacturers or vendors that may be mentioned or displayed in the course of the presentation.

There is NO mention of off label use of equipment or medications mentioned in this presentation.

3 of 87

OBJECTIVES

1- Physiology of hemostasis and coagulation

2-Pharmacological aspects of new oral anticoagulants

3- Impact of the new oral anticoagulants on anesthesia practice

4-Management of complications related to the new oral anticoagulants

4 of 87

WHY PATIENTS USE OR WILL USE ANTICOAGULANTS?

Mechanical heart valves.

Cardiac arrhythmias.

Prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism and other thromboembolic events which are commonly associated with surgical procedures.

Treatment of acute thromboembolic events

5 of 87

CONSEQUENCES OF THROMBUS

consequences

angina

Myocardial infaction

stroke

Deep venous thrombosis

6 of 87

HEMOSTASIS

7 of 87

HEMOSTASIS

HEME= BLOOD

STASIS= TO HALT

PROCESS OF RETAINING BLOOD WITHIN THE VASCULAR SYSTEM

REPAIRS INJURY TO BLOOD VESSELS

STOPS OR PREVENTS BLOOD LOSS

8 of 87

COMPONENTS OF HEMOSTASIS

Vascular System

    • Controls rate of blood flow

Platelet System

    • Interaction of vasculature and platelets form a temporary plug

Coagulation System

    • Forms a stable insoluble plug (i.e) fibrin forming

Fibrinolytic System

    • Fibrin lysing

Coagulation Inhibition System

    • Natural inhibitors
    • Control fibrin formation and fibrin lysis

9 of 87

HEMOSTASIS

Vessel Injury

Platelet

Activation

Platelet

aggregation

Blood Vessel

Constriction

Coagulation

Activation

Stable Hemostatic Plug

Fibrin clot

Reduced

Blood flow

Tissue Factor

Primary hemostatic plug

Neural

10 of 87

Steps in Hemostasis

A. Vasoconstriction

B. Primary hemostasis (Platelet plug formation)

C. Secondary hemostasis (Fibrin clot formation)

D. Clot Retraction

E. Clot Dissolution

11 of 87

A. VASOCONSTRICTION

12 of 87

B. Primary Hemostasis: Platelets

latelet

adhesion

vWF

13 of 87

C. Secondary Hemostasis: The Clotting Mechanism

14 of 87

COAGULATION

Coagulation is a complex process by which blood forms clots.

Coagulation begins almost instantly after an injury to the blood vessel has damaged the endothelium (lining of the vessel).

15 of 87

COAGULATION

  • A highly regulated cascade of reactions that form a variety of products involved in hemostasis

  • Participants include:
  • – Enzymatic coagulation factors
  • – Non-enzymatic co-factors

16 of 87

ENZYMATIC COAGULATION FACTORS

  • Proenzymes: Plasma proteins that circulate in inactive form; produced mainly in hepatocytes

  • Upon activation, they gain the suffix “a”; Prekallikrein is an exception, the activated form is called kallikrein

  • Production of some proenzyme factors is vitamin-K dependent – Factors II, VII, IX, X

  • These factors bind Ca+2 to allow critical interactions with phospholipid membranes

17 of 87

Factor Common Name

Number

I Fibrinogen

II Prothrombin

III Tissue Factor

IV Ca2+

Va Proaccelerin

VII Proconvertin

VIII Antihemophilic Factor

IX Christmas Factor

X Stuart Factor

XI Plasma thromboplastin antecedent

XII Hageman factor

XIII Fibrin Stabilizing Factor

18 of 87

COAGULATION FACTORS

FACTORS

PLASMA t ½

(hrs)

Fibrinogen (I)

72-120

Prothrombin (II)

60-70

V

12-16

VII

3-6

VIII

8-12

IX

18-24

X

30-40

FACTORS

PLASMA t ½

(hrs)

XI

52

XII

60

Protein C

6

Protein S (total)

42

Tissue factor

--

Thrombomodulin

--

antithrombin

72

Roberts HR, et al. Current Concepts for Hemostasis. Anesthesiology 2004;100:3. 722-30.

19 of 87

SECONDARY HEMOSTASIS�THE COAGULATION CASCADE

The coagulation cascade of secondary hemostasis has two pathways:

    • The contact activation pathway (formerly known as the intrinsic pathway)
    • The tissue factor pathway (formerly known as the extrinsic pathway)
    • That lead to fibrin formation.

20 of 87

CLOTTING CASCADE

AJHP 2004;61:S7.

21 of 87

THE NEW MODEL OF COAGULATION

22 of 87

Initiation phase

23 of 87

Amplification phase

24 of 87

Propagation phase

25 of 87

ANTICOAGULANTS

Although tissue breakdown and platelets destruction are normal events in the absence of trauma, intravascular clotting does not usually occur because:

    • the amounts of procoagulants released are very small
    • natural anticoagulants are present (Antithrombin III, Heparin, Antithromboplastin, Protein C and S)

26 of 87

NATURAL ANTICOAGULANTS

Antithrombin III – inhibits factor X and thrombin

Heparin from basophils and mast cells potentiates effects of antithrombin III (together they inhibit IX, X, XI, XII and thrombin)

Antithromboplastin –inhibits tissue factor (tissue thromboplastins)

Protein C and S – activated by thrombin; degrade factor Va and VIIIa

27 of 87

28 of 87

ATIII

Clotting Factors

Tissue factor

PAI-1

Antiplasmin

TFPI

Protein C

Protein S

Procoagulant

Anticoagulant

Fibrinolytic System

29 of 87

ANTICOAGULANTS

30 of 87

DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY �CURRENT FDA APPROVED ANTICOAGULANTS

1930s

Heparin

1950s

1990s

2002

1970s

Warfarin

LMWHs

Factor Xa inhibitor

DTIs

Argatroban

Bivalirudin

Lepirudin

Fondaparinux

Enoxaparin

Dalteparin

Tinzaparin

1980s

2010-12

DTI and

Factor Xa

inhibitors

Dabigatran

Rivaroxaban

Apixaban

31 of 87

Blood Vessel Injury

IX

IXa

XI

XIa

X

Xa

XII

XIIa

Tissue Injury

Tissue Factor

VIIa

VII

X

Prothrombin

Thrombin

Fibrinogen

Fibrin monomer

Fibrin polymer

XIII

First generation Anticoagulants

Factors affected

By Heparin

Vit. K dependent Factors

Affected by Oral Anticoagulants

32 of 87

SECOND AND EMERGING THERAPIES

33 of 87

New anticoagulant drugs

34 of 87

DISADVANTAGE OF FIRST GENERATIONS ANTICOAGULANTS

  • Narrow therapeutic index
  • Need for frequent monitoring
  • Slow onset and offset of action
  • Route of administration
  • Large inter-individual dosing differences
  • Drug-Drug and drug-food interactions
  • Genetic polymorphisms

35 of 87

COMPLICATIONS OF FIRST GENERATION ANTICOAGULANTS

Bleeding

New Thrombosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Osteoporosis

Warfarin skin necrosis

Warfarin embryopathy

Slow onset of action

Needs regular monitoring

Interaction with food

Interacts with medications

Difficult titration-regular dose adjustments

36 of 87

THE IDEAL ORAL ANTICOAGULANT

Require no remote monitoring

Have little interaction with food or other drugs

Broad therapeutic window

Offer a good safety profile with regard to bleeding risk

Have similar efficacy to warfarin in reducing thromboembolic events

Reach therapeutic levels within several hours

Oral and/or IV administration

Ability to inhibit free and clot bound thrombin

Availability of an antidote

Easily reversible

Affordable (acceptable cost-benefit ratio)

37 of 87

NEW TERMINOLOGY

  • DOACs – Direct oral anticoagulants
  • NOACs – New oral anticoagulants
  • TSOACs – Target specific oral anticoagulants

38 of 87

BACKGROUND

  • TSOACs work further down the clotting cascade
  • There are currently three FDA-approved TSOACs:
    • Dabigatran (Pradaxa): a direct thrombin inhibitor
    • Rivaroxaban (Xarelto): a factor Xa inhibitor
    • Apixaban (Eliquis): a factor Xa inhibitor

38

39 of 87

TSOACS VS. WARFARIN

  • Multiple large randomized controlled trials have been performed comparing TSOACs with warfarin
    • TSOACs are at least as effective as warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism
    • TSOACs have similar, if not lower, rates of serious hemorrhagic complications (e.g., intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding)

40 of 87

DIRECT THROMBIN INHIBITION

VIIa

Xa

IXa

XIa

XIIa

Tissue factor

Factor IIa�(thrombin)

Dabigatran

II

×

41 of 87

DABIGATRAN

  • Oral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI)
  • Rapidly converted from dabigatran etexilate to dabigatran (hydrolysed by esterases in the stomach to active drug)
  • Needs acidic environment for best absorption
  • Binds clot-bound and free thrombin with high affinity and specificity
  • Predictable anticoagulant effect
  • Low plasma protein binding
  • No liver toxicity based on available clinical data

42 of 87

DABIGATRAN

  • Absorption
    • Bioavailability ~6%
    • Requires acidic environment
  • Onset is immediate with peak activity at 2-3 hrs
  • Plasma t ½ 12-17 hours
  • Excreted renally (80%); eliminated in bile
  • Reduced renal function results in up to a six-fold increase in plasma concentration and a prolonged half-life
  • In cases of end-stage renal disease, elimination half-life doubled from 14 to 28 h.
  • In healthy elderly subjects, concentrations are 40–60% higher than in younger subjects, which is primarily a reflection of reduced renal function.

43 of 87

DABIGATRAN

No significant food-drug interaction

Not metabolized by P450 Isoenzymes

Few drug-drug interactions (amiodarone, quinidine, verapamil )

dose once daily

Approved for

    • Non valvular Afib
    • DVT and PE

No monitoring is required

NOT for use in patients with artificial valves

Approved in Europe and Canada for orthopedic prophylaxis

44 of 87

DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE CLINICAL TRIALS

TRIAL

PATIENT POPULATION

DOSING

COMPARATOR

OUTCOME

RESULTS

VTE PREVENTION

RE-NOVATE

THR

150 or 220mg qday

(28-35 days)

Enox 40mg qday

VTE + all cause mortality

Non-inferior

RE-MODEL

TKR

150 or 220mg qday

(6-10 days)

Enox 40mg qday

Non-inferior

RE-MOBILIZE

TKR

150 or 220mg qday

(12-15 days)

Enox 30mg bid

Failed to achieve noninferiority

STROKE PREVENTION

RE-LY

AFIB

110 or 150mg bid

Warfarin

(INR 2-3)

Stroke or systemic embolism

150mg (superior)

110mg (non-inferior)

45 of 87

DABIGATRAN SAFETY

Trial

Patient population

Dosing

Comparator

Outcome

Results

VTE PREVENTION

RE-NOVATE

THR

150 or 220mg qday

(28-35 days)

Enox 40mg qday

Major Bleeding

2.0% (220mg)

1.3% (150mg)

vs.

1.6%

RE-MODEL

TKR

150 or 220mg qday

(6-10 days)

Enox 40mg qday

1.5% (220mg)

1.3% (150mg)

vs.

1.3%

RE-MOBILIZE

TKR

150 or 220mg qday

(12-15 days)

Enox 30mg bid

0.6% (220mg)

0.6% (150mg)

vs.

1.4%

STROKE PREVENTION

RE-LY

AFIB

110 or 150mg bid

Warfarin

(INR 2-3)

Major Bleeding

3.11% (150mg)

2.71%(110mg)*

vs.

3.36%

46 of 87

DIRECT FACTOR XA INHIBITION

VIIa

Xa

IXa

XIa

XIIa

Tissue factor

Fibrinogen

Fibrin clot

Factor II�(prothrombin)

Rivaroxaban

Apixaban

Edoxaban

×

47 of 87

RIVAROXABAN

  • Direct factor-Xa inhibitor
  • Inhibits free factor-Xa as well as prothrombinase-bound and clot bound factor-Xa
  • Circulates primarily bound to albumin (95%)
  • 80-100% oral bioavailability
  • Peak activity at 2-4 hours
  • Hepatic metabolism with renal and fecal excretion
  • Avoid with CrCl <15 ml/min; caution when CrCl 15-30ml/min
  • No food and few drug interactions

48 of 87

RIVAROXABAN

    • Elimination
      • 1/3 unchanged in urine
      • 1/3 inactive metabolites excreted in urine
      • 1/3 inactive metabolites fecal
      • T ½
        • 5-9 hrs (young patients)
        • 11-13 hrs (elderly)
    • Metabolism
      • CYP 3A4, 2J2, CYP independent mechanism

49 of 87

RIVAROXABAN CLINICAL TRIALS

TRIAL

PATIENT

DOSING

COMPARATOR

OUTCOME

RESULTS

RECORD 1

THR

10mg qday

(31-39 days)

Enox 40mg qday

Composite VTE and all cause mortality

Riva 1.1%

Enox 3.7%

p<0.001 (sup)

RECORD 2

THR

10mg qday

(31-39 days)

Enox 40mg qday

(10-14 days)

Riva 2%

Enox 9.3%

p<0.001 (sup)

RECORD 3

TKR

10mg qday

(10-14 days)

Enox 40mg qday

Riva 9.6%

Enox 18.9%

p=0.012 (sup)

RECORD 4

TKR

10mg qday

(10-14 days)

Enox 30mg bid

Riva 6.9%

Enox 10.1%

p<0.001 (sup)

50 of 87

RIVAROXABAN SAFETY

Thromb Haemost 2010: 103:572-585

TRIAL

PATIENT

DOSING

COMPARATOR

OUTCOME

RESULTS

RECORD 1

THR

10mg qday

(31-39 days)

Enox 40mg qday

Major Bleeding

Riva 0.3%

Enox 0.1%

p=0.18

RECORD 2

THR

10mg qday

(31-39 days)

Enox 40mg qday

(10-14 days)

Riva 0.1%

Enox 0.1%

p=1.00

RECORD 3

TKR

10mg qday

(10-14 days)

Enox 40mg qday

Riva 0.6%

Enox 0.5%

p=0.79

RECORD 4

TKR

10mg qday

(10-14 days)

Enox 30mg bid

Riva 0.7%

Enox 0.3%

p=0.31

51 of 87

APIXABAN

  • Direct factor-Xa inhibitor
  • Inhibits free factor Xa as well as clot bound Xa and activated prothrombinase bound Xa
  • Peak activity at 3 hours
  • T ½ - 8 to 11 hours
  • Non-renal metabolism with renal (25-30%) and fecal (65%) excretion
  • Reduce dosing with ketoconazole, itraconazole, ritonair, clarithromycin

52 of 87

APIXABAN CLINICAL TRIALS

Thromb Haemost 2010: 103:572-585

Trial

Patients

Dosing

Comparator

Outcome

Results

ADVANCE-1

TKR

2.5mg BID

(10-14 days)

Enox 30mg bid

Total VTE + all cause mortality

API 9.0%

Enox 8.8%

Non-Inferiority not met

Bleeding

API 5.3%

Enox 6.6%

ADVANCE-2

TKR

2.5mg BID

(10-14 days)

Enox 40mg qday

Total VTE + all cause mortality

Api 15.1%

Enox 24.4%

p=0.001

Bleeding

Api 3.5%

Enox 4.8%

p=0.09

53 of 87

TSOAS

Thromb Haemost 2010: 103:572-585

J Thromb Thrombolysis 2013;36:133-140.

54 of 87

NEW ANTICOAGULANTS

Benefits

    • Efficacy similar in to present therapy in many clinical settings
    • Large trials support relative safety compared to VKA
    • Wide therapeutic window

Problems

    • Inability to accurately monitor the agents
    • NO antidotes
    • Short t ½ may leave patients unprotected with missed doses
    • No clear indication of patients that may benefit most from the new therapies

55 of 87

MONITORING

Requires understanding of the available coagulation tests

Should not be done “routinely” but limited to clinical situations a specific goal in mind

    • Urgent pre-op assessment
    • Active bleeding assessment

Presently – do not quantitatively assess the degree of anticoagulation but can make a qualitative assessment

56 of 87

MONITORING

  • Dabigatran Do not have reliable laboratory monitoring

    • PT is insensitive to dabigatran
      • INR rarely exceeds 1.2
    • aPTT is more sensitive with less variability
    • Very high dabigatran levels are underestimated by aPTT values

van Ryn et al. Thromb Haemost 2010;103:1116-1127.

57 of 87

MONITORING

van Ryn et al. Thromb Haemost 2010;103:1116-1127.

For DTIs - ECT is the best lab monitor – not widely available/not FDA approved

Chromogenic anti-factor II – FDA approved but not for monitoring DTIs

Thrombin time is too sensitive

58 of 87

MONITORING

Limited data a best are available for rivaroxaban and apixaban for monitoring or reversal

Rivaroxaban and Apixaban influences

    • prothrombin time (PT) > aPTT

Rivaroxaban and apixaban should be able to be monitored by chromogenic Anti-Xa assays

Standards have not been set/reported

59 of 87

MONITORING GUIDELINES

J Thromb Thrombolysis 2013;36:187-194.

60 of 87

CLINICAL SITUATION RELATED TO NEW ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS

Time to discontinue and start the NOAs

Bleeding Issues and its management

Regional anesthesia, what we do

61 of 87

PRE-PROCEDURE INTERRUPTION OF THE NOAS

62 of 87

PRE-PROCEDURAL INTERRUPTION

J Thromb Thrombolysis 2013;36:212-222.

Levy JH, Key NS, Azran MS. Novel oral anticoagulants: implications in the perioperative setting. Anesthesiology 2010;113:726-45.

63 of 87

PRE-PROCEDURAL INTERRUPTION

Cleve Clin J Med 2013;80:443-451.

Hall R, Mazer CD. Antiplatelet drugs: a review of their pharmacology and management in the perioperative period. Anesth Analg 2011;112:292-318.

64 of 87

Bridging algorithm for vitamin K antagonists and new oral anticoagulants.

Gallego P et al. Circulation 2012;126:1573-1576

Copyright © American Heart Association

Editorial, Circulation, September 2012 vol. 126 no. 13 1573-1576

Bridging algorithm for vitamin K antagonists and new oral anticoagulants.

65 of 87

'New' direct oral anticoagulants in the perioperative setting.

Breuer, Georg; Weiss, Dominik; Ringwald, Juergen

Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 27(4):409-419, August 2014.

66 of 87

'New' direct oral anticoagulants in the perioperative setting.

Breuer, Georg; Weiss, Dominik; Ringwald, Juergen .Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 27(4):409-419, August 2014.

67 of 87

PRE-OP MANAGEMENT�(EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE)

If surgery cannot be delayed, there is an increased risk of bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulants.

Risk of bleeding should be weighed against the urgency of intervention.

Discontinue drugs minimum 1 to 2 days (CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min)

Patients with the highest risk of bleeding hold for 2-4 days

major surgery, spinal puncture, or placement of a spinal or epidural catheter or port, in whom complete hemostasis may be required

CrCl< 50 mL/min hold 2 to 5 days before elective invasive or surgical procedures

van Ryn et al. Thromb Haemost 2010;103:1116-1127.

68 of 87

BRIDGING OR NO BRIDGING

69 of 87

BRIDGING DECISION

Does AC need interrupted?

Is bridging required (risk assessment)?

Anticoagulation Intensity

    • (risk/bleeding assessment)
    • “full” or “therapeutic”
      • (e.g., Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID or UFH gtt)
    • “prophylactic”
      • (e.g., Enoxaparin 40 mg/day or SQ UFH)

70 of 87

RISK STRATIFICATION FOR BLEEDING

High bleeding-risk surgeries/procedures include:

  • Urologic surgery/procedures: TURP, bladder resection or tumor ablation, nephrectomy or kidney biopsy (untreated tissue damage after TURP and endogenous urokinase release)
  • Pacemaker or ICD implantation (separation of infraclavicular fascia and no suturing of unopposed tissues may lead to hematoma)
  • Colonic polyp resection, especially >1-2 cm sessile polyps (bleeding occurs at transected stalk after hemostatic plug release)
  • Vascular organ surgery: thyroid, liver, spleen
  • Bowel resection (bleeding may occur at anastomosis site)
  • Major surgery tissue injury: cancer surgery, joint arthroplasty, recoinvolving considerable nstructive plastic surgery
  • Cardiac, intracranial or spinal surgery (small bleeds can have serious clinical consequences)

71 of 87

SUGGESTED RISK STRATIFICATION: MECHANICAL HEART VALVES

High Risk

  • Any mitral valve prosthesis
  • Older (caged-ball or tilting disc) aortic valve prosthesis
  • Recent (within 6 months) stroke or TIA

Moderate Risk

  • Bileaflet aortic valve and at least one of:
  • Atrial fibrillation, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, age >75 years

Low Risk

  • Bileaflet aortic valve without atrial fibrillation and no other risk factors for stroke

Copyright: American College of Chest Physicians 2012©

72 of 87

SUGGESTED RISK STRATIFICATION: ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

High Risk

  • CHADS score = 5
  • Recent (within 3 months) stroke or TIA
  • Rheumatic valvular heart disease

Moderate Risk

  • CHADS score = 3-4

Low Risk

  • CHADS score = 0-2 and no prior stroke or TIA

N.B. Individual patient characteristics (eg, prior embolic stroke or perioperative stroke/TIA) may override suggested risk stratification

Copyright: American College of Chest Physicians 2012©

73 of 87

SUGGESTED RISK STRATIFICATION: VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM

High Risk

  • Recent VTE (<3 months ago)
  • Severe thrombophilia (eg, antiphospholipid antibodies)

Moderate Risk

  • VTE within the past 3-12 months
  • Nonsevere thrombophilia (eg, heterozygous factor V mutation)
  • Recurrent VTE
  • Active cancer (treated within 6 months or palliative)

Low Risk

  • Prior VTE >12 months ago and no other risk factors

Copyright: American College of Chest Physicians 2012©

74 of 87

BRIDGING PROTOCOL

Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2011;104:669-676.

Copyright: American College of Chest Physicians 2012©

75 of 87

BLEEDING

76 of 87

MANAGING BLEEDING

Hold the drug

Local hemostatic measures

Supportive PRBC/PLT transfusions

Initiate a hematology consult early

Institutional protocols are recommended

77 of 87

MANAGING BLEEDING

Maintain adequate diuresis given renal elimination

With overdose – when given within 1-2 hours of ingestion activated charcoal can adsorb dabigatran (in vitro data)

Protamine sulfate and vitamin K should not be expected to affect the anticoagulant activity

Specific reversal agents (“antidotes”) not yet available

78 of 87

MANAGING BLEEDING

Dabigatran can be dialyzed with removal of about 60% of drug over 2-3 hrs.

Rivaroxaban is not expected to be dialyzable (high plasma protein binding).

Consider transfusion of fresh frozen plasma, platelets or red blood cells for supportive management

79 of 87

FRESH FROZEN PLASMA

There are no studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) for reversal of NOACs.

In a recent case report, administration of FFP in conjunction with recombinant activated factor VII (rVIIa) was ineffective at restoring hemostasis in a patient with dabigatran-associated epidural hematoma and spinal cord compression following traumatic injury .

FFP reduced the volume of intracerebral hemorrhage in mice receiving high-dose dabigatran, without an effect on mortality.

High-dose FFP only partially reversed the prolonged PT induced by edoxaban in a rat model.

FFP administration is associated with increased risk of circulatory overload, transfusion-related acute lung injury, allergic reactions and infection.

80 of 87

DILUTION IS INEVITABLE WHEN GIVING�BLOOD COMPONENTS

80

Whole blood 500 mL

(Hct 38%–50%; PLTs 150K–400K; Plasma coagulation activity 100%)

1 U PRBC

(335 mL, Hct 55%)

1 U Plasma

(275 mL, coagulation activity 80%)

1 U PLTs

(50 mL, 5.5 x 1010 PLTs

150 mL anticoagulant added; centrifuged

Patient Receives 650 mL fluid:

Hct 29%, PLTs 88K, 65% coagulation activity

Adapted from Dutton RP. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27(9 pt 2):85S–92S.

81 of 87

MANAGING BLEEDING

Some evidence supports use of activated prothrombin complex concentrates (FEIBA) for rivaroxaban, recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven) for dabigatran or concentrates of coagulation factors II, IX, or X (PCC) but data are limited.

4-factor PCC recently approved in the US.

    • Best data available for the DTIs

Always concerns about the “potentially” prothrombotic state created with bypassing agents.

Xa recombinant reversing agent is under investigation. Phase II data was encouraging

    • Phase III in development

82 of 87

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

83 of 87

TSOACS AND NEURAXIAL ANESTHESIA

Recent guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine recommend that TSOACs be stopped for 2–4 days (depending on which of the 3 was used) prior to initiation of neuraxial anesthesia

These guidelines recommend against use of a TSOAC while a catheter is in place if possible, or to delay removal of a catheter until the anticoagulant effect is minimal

84 of 87

Last application of a NOAC before neuraxial anesthesia

'New' direct oral anticoagulants in the perioperative setting. Breuer, Georg; Weiss, Dominik; Ringwald, Juergen. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 27(4):409-419, August 2014.

Baron TH, Kamath PS, McBane RD. Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing invasive procedures. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2113-24.

Connolly G, Spyropoulos AC. Practical issues, limitations, and periprocedural management of the NOAC's. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2013;36:212-22.

Liew A, Douketis J. Perioperative management of patients who are receiving a novel oral anticoagulant. Intern Emerg Med 2013;8:477-84.

Gogarten W, Vandermeulen E, Van Aken H, Kozek S, Llau JV, Samama CM; European Society of Anaesthesiology. Regional anaesthesia and antithrombotic agents: recommendations of the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:999-1015.

85 of 87

Recommendations for neuroaxial anesthesia if NOAs administered for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis

Dabigatran

Rivaroxaban

Apixaban

Time between epidural anesthetic technique and next anticoagulant dose

2-4 h

4-6 h

6h

Time before last anticoagulant dose and epidural catheter removal

NR

22-26h

26-30h

Time between removal of epidural catheter and next anticoagulant dose

6h

4-6h

4-6h

'New' direct oral anticoagulants in the perioperative setting. Breuer, Georg; Weiss, Dominik; Ringwald, Juergen. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 27(4):409-419, August 2014.

86 of 87

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Anesthesiology 2013;118:1466-1474.

87 of 87

THANK YOU