Adaptation of Rural Communities to Climate Change
Sucharita Sen
Centre for the Study of Regional Development
Jawaharlal Nehru University
Linking Science and Society in Climate Change: Research Gaps
OR
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Scientific and Social-Science Knowledge: Comparison of Perspectives on Climate Change
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Film 1. Is Earth Warming? Climate Change, Lines of Evidence�
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
How is India likely to get affected?
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
| Heat | Rainfall | Droughts | Glacier Melt |
What we know | India is already experiencing a warming climate. | A decline in monsoon rainfall since the 1950s. The frequency of heavy rainfall events increased. | An increase in the number of drought In 1987 and 2002-2003, droughts affected more than half of India’s crop areas. 2014? | Glaciers in the northwestern Himalayas/ Karakoram range stable but glaciers fed by the summer monsoon retreating |
What could happen | Unusual spells of hot weather more frequently and in larger areas. | Summer monsoon unpredictable; an extremely wet monsoon- once in every 10 years. Increase in extreme events | More frequent in some areas, especially in north-western India, Jharkhand, Orissa and Chhattisgarh. | Melting glaciers and the loss of snow cover in Himalayas expected to threaten stability and reliability of northern India’s primarily glacier-fed rivers (Indus and the Brahmaputra)- seasonal fluctuations. |
Agriculture and food security
What we know
What could happen
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Potential Impacts: Some Opportunities
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Film 2: INDIA: �Thank you,� climate change? �
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Mitigation and Adaptation: Difference
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Anatomy of Adaptation
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
What is Adaptation?
Adaptation to What
CLIMATE RELATED STIMULI
Who or what adapts?
SYSTEMS THROUGH INDIVIDUALS AND INSTITUTION
How does Adaptation Occur?
TYPES
Non-climatic forces
And Conditions
How Good is the Adaptation?
EVALUATION
Typologies of Climate Changes that would Impact Agriculture and Allied Activities
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Perceptions to Climate Change first step to Adaptation and potentially depends on..
Community characteristics
Individual characteristics
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Film 2: Coping with Change: Climate Change Adaptation in the North Eastern Region of India �
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Resilience and Sensitivity of Agro-Ecosystems
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Resilience to Climate Change | Sensitivity to Climate Change | |
High | Low | |
High | Prone to Change High Adaptive Capacity | Less Prone to Change High Adaptive Capacity |
Low | Prone to Change Low Adaptive Capacity | Less Prone to Change Low Adaptive Capacity |
Vulnerability of Individuals/ Community and Capacity to Adapt
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Vulnerability Indicators | Proxy for: | Mechanisms for Translation into Vulnerability |
Poverty Lower order Social Identities | Marginalization | Narrowing of coping and resistance strategies; less diversified and restricted entitlements; lack of empowerment |
Inequality | Conflicts in terms of interests ; Degree of collective responsibility low; | Direct: Concentration of available resources in smaller groups restricting collective entitlements Indirect: Inequality and poverty links |
Institutional Adaptation | Conduits of collective perception of vulnerability; determines MBCA and resilience | Responsiveness, evolution and adaptability at community level reducing individual vulnerabilities |
Field Insights: Farm size and 5 Forms of Capital
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
| Human | Financial | Natural | Physical | Social | Cumulative |
Small | 1.42 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.31 | 2.70 | 1.88 |
Medium | 1.73 | 2.00 | 2.33 | 2.46 | 2.69 | 2.25 |
Large | 2.15 | 2.19 | 2.46 | 2.58 | 2.23 | 2.32 |
Total | 1.77 | 1.74 | 2.27 | 2.45 | 2.54 | 2.15 |
Typology of Adaptations
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Short Term | Long Term |
1. Farm responses | 1. Changing Crop Type |
i. Crop and Livestock Diversification and Changes in Timing of Farm Operations | 2. Development of new Technology in response to a direction of change |
ii. Improved Nutrient and Pest Control Management | 3. Improving Water Management |
2. Temporary/ seasonal Migration | 4. Changing timings of agricultural operations |
3. Insurance | 5. Permanent Migration |
| |
Adaptation Irrespective of Climate Change that may help mitigate effects of Climate Change
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Public Response | Private Response |
Increasing public investment in Infrastructure | Increasing private investment in irrigation and other agricultural assets |
Reform of pricing schemes- provision of regulated markets | Changing place of sale of agricultural product |
R&D investments (can be directed to climate change effects) | Taking benefits of extension services |
Incentives for trade | Diversification of Income sources and cropping system |
Dissemination of climatic data | Using disseminated climatic data for deciding short term crop strategies |
Provisioning extension service | Strengthening and ensuring participation in old and new community institutions respectively |
Enabling institution building (watershed programmes) | |
Some Field Insights…
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Location Map of Miyar Basin
Change in Lahaul Agriculture: Specialization towards High Value Crops
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
| N | Peas | Potato | Kuth | Manu | Barley | Kidney Beans |
Small Farmers | 26 | 74.0 | 25.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
(below 6 bighas) | | | | | | | |
Medium Farmers | 28 | 58.2 | 39.1 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
(6-10 bighas) | | | | | | | |
Large Farmers | 26 | 54.5 | 30.9 | 12.7 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
(above 10 bighas) | | | | | | | |
Al farmers | 80 | 58.8 | 33.0 | 7.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
Share of Gross Cropped Area (in %)
A complete departure from the traditional crops.
Market Oriented Production
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Size of Land Holding | Peas | Potato | Kuth | Manu | |
Small Farmers
| N | 25 | 19 | 2 |
|
% product marketed | 100.0 | 80.3 | 85.7 |
| |
Medium Farmers
| N | 28 | 28 | 4 |
|
% product marketed | 100.0 | 92.5 | 77.4 |
| |
Large Farmers
| N | 26 | 26 | 22 | 3 |
% product marketed | 99.6 | 89.9 | 76.0 | 87.5 | |
All farmers
| N | 79 | 73 | 28 | 3 |
% product marketed | 99.9 | 88.4 | 76.9 | 87.5 |
High percentage of marketed surplus.
Reasons for Commercialization: �Not an Issue of Climate (Change)
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Farm Size Categories | Road | Better Income | Access to Information | Row Total |
Small Farmers | 10 | 14 | 2 | 26 |
38.5% | 53.8% | 7.7% | 100.0% | |
Medium Farmers | 11 | 13 | 4 | 28 |
39.3% | 46.4% | 14.3% | 100.0% | |
Large Farmers | 16 | 10 | 0 | 26 |
61.5% | 38.5% | .0% | 100.0% | |
All Farmers | 37 | 37 | 6 | 80 |
46.3% | 46.3% | 7.5% | 100.0% |
As a result of connectivity and demand for higher income.
Is Commercialisation Risky?
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Farm Size Categories | Risky | Not Risky |
Small Farmers | 17 | 9 |
65.4% | 34.6% | |
Medium Farmers | 19 | 9 |
67.9% | 32.1% | |
Large Farmers | 16 | 10 |
61.5% | 38.5% | |
All Farmers | 52 | 28 |
65.0% | 35.0% |
Commercialization considered to be risky by most of the farmers.
Risks to Commertialisation
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Farm Size Categories | Ex-Ante Factors | Ex-Post Factors | Row Total | ||
Road Blocks | Climatic Variability | ||||
Pests | Land Degradation | ||||
Small Farmers | 4 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 26 |
15.4% | 15.4% | 7.7% | 61.5% | 100% | |
Medium Farmers | 2 | 6 | 3 | 17 | 28 |
7.1% | 21.4% | 10.7% | 60.7% | 100% | |
Large Farmers | 5 | 9 | 2 | 10 | 26 |
19.2% | 34.6% | 7.7% | 38.5% | 100% | |
All Farmers | 11 | 19 | 7 | 43 | 80 |
13.8% | 23.8% | 8.8% | 53.8% | 100% |
Farmers’ Perception of Climatic Changes
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
An increase in temperature coupled with delay in the snowfall onset perceived for more than a decade.
Perception of Effect on Resources: � ‘No Change in Water Availability for Agriculture’ which is still Abundant
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
No change felt in terms of water availability for irrigation from Kuls.
Some drying of wells are evident, but the households easily transition to alternative wells.
No or at Best Weak Responses/Adaptations
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Perception in change in temperature (increase) and delay in snow onset could potentially increase cropping season and intensity.
But little/no response to the perceived climatic change due to the uncertainties and suitability factors attached to it.
Local Institutions in Response to Resource Management
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Village | Mahila Mandal | Yuva Mandal | Community Grazing | Gram Panchayat Representation | ||
Resource Managed | Forest | Irrigation Water | Livestock | | ||
Tingrit | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
Ghumpa | No | No | Combined with Urgos Village | Yes | ||
Urgos | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
Sukto | Combined with Khanjar Village | Yes | ||||
Khanjar | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014
Labour Exchange: Use of Social Capital to deal with financial and human capital constraints
Kuhl Committee: Use of Social Capital to deal with natural capital constraints
Examples of Informal Institutions
Film 3:Factoring Gender into Climate Change Action �
CSE, Agenda for survival, 2014
6/26/2014