1 of 22

CSO Offshore Energy & Infrastructure�Work Group Call

September 28, 2022

2 of 22

Agenda

​

Staff Update

OSW Wildlife and Fisheries Mitigation

Member Updates

Legislative Discussion

Schedule Next Call

3 of 22

Legislative Update

4 of 22

�Staff Update�2022 CSO Fall Meeting

Portsmouth, New Hampshire

Monday – Thursday, October 3-6, 2022

​

Mon-Tues – Business Meeting

Weds – Field Visits

Thurs – Members & Guests

5 of 22

�Staff Update�Staff Update

  • CSO comment on draft BOEM Fisheries Mitigation Guidance submitted Aug 22
  • ASBPA / CSO Project:
    • Sediment Placement Regulations of U.S. Coastal States and Territories: Towards Regional Sediment Management Implementation
    • Regional workshops completed
    • Final report and recommendations under development
  • Aquaculture survey

6 of 22

�Member Discussion�OSW Wildlife / Fisheries Mitigation Impacts

Authorities

​

  • OCSLA: Ensure protection of the environment, conservation of OCS resources
  • NEPA: Assess environmental impact and alternatives
  • ESA: Take of E&T species and critical habitat (USFWS & NMFS consultation)
  • MMPA: Take of marine mammals (NMFS consultation)
  • MSA: Adverse effect on essential fish habitat (NMFS consultation)
  • MBTA: Take of protected migratory bird species (USFWS consultation via NEPA)

​

​

7 of 22

�Member Discussion�OSW Wildlife / Fisheries Mitigation Impacts

Emily Shumchenia, Regional Wildlife Science Collaborative for Offshore Wind

Overview of the RWSC and how Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states are working to prioritize science needs for offshore wind.

​

Carl Wilson, Maine Department of Marine Resources

Fisheries research and spatial analysis ME DMR has done as concerns potential siting of wind energy development.

​

Lisa Engler, MA Office of Coastal Zone Management

Mass Habitat and Fisheries working groups and how they’ve informed the fisheries compensatory mitigation discussions.

​

8 of 22

�Member Discussion�OSW Wildlife / Fisheries Mitigation Impacts

Discussion Questions

​

What is the top concern/barrier your program faces:

  • Regarding particular species, habitats, or resources?
  • Regarding procedures or institutions?
  • Regarding data needs?

Do you have any questions for the moderator to share with the panelists next week?

​

9 of 22

Member Updates

10 of 22

�Member Discussion�Aquaculture Survey

Today: Three Questions

​

Full Survey: Responses requested by Friday, August 19, 2022.

11 of 22

�Member Discussion�Aquaculture Survey

  1. What kind of support does your program most need from federal agencies to make aquaculture permitting more efficient?

​

  • Access to federal datasets
  • Research support to fill data / information gaps
  • Decision support tools / mapping tools
  • Interagency coordination processes
  • Guidance or training on federal permitting requirements
  • Guidance or training on aquaculture project design
  • Guidance or training on environmental impacts
  • Support for community/stakeholder engagement

12 of 22

�Member Discussion�Aquaculture Survey

2) What aquaculture topics would be helpful to address on future CSO work group calls?

​

  • Development of and how to use regional Aquaculture Atlases
  • Development of Aquaculture Opportunity Area Programmatic EISs
  • Federal consistency, unlisted activity requests, geographic location descriptions
  • Impact analyses, data needs
  • Monitoring technology / protocols, enforcement
  • Permitting for floating structures

13 of 22

�Member Discussion�Aquaculture Survey

3) How does your state process 401 certification requests for aquaculture projects?

Coastal program role

Trends, priorities, barriers

14 of 22

�Legislative Update�Energy Independence & Security Act of 2022

NEPA

  • Extend IRA NEPA reforms to energy, carbon, mineral resource projects; major projects
  • Lead federal agency:
    • Identify and invite participating w/in 45 days (NOI or start EA) & set deadline
    • Set review timeline w/in 90 days (NOI or start EA) – include state process MEP
    • Accept equivalent data, analyses, documentation, incl state reviews
  • Time limits for major projects: 2yr (EIS); 1yr (EA); 180 days post ROD (other permits), ext. 1yr max
  • Default time limits on comment: 60 days (EIS); 45 up to 60 days (all else)
  • Issue resolution meetings; escalation; technical assistance
  • Statute of limitations 150 days; max. 180 day schedule on remand
  • Multiple savings provisions (requirements; time periods)

​

​

15 of 22

�Legislative Update�Inflation Reduction Act

  • $2.6B over 4 years of NOAA funding to coastal states for coastal restoration, conservation, or to finance resilient infrastructure
  • NOAA funding for transparency; research improvements
  • $100M to DOW for planning, modeling, analysis, and development of interregional transmission and optimized integration; $760M to DOE for transmission grants
  • Lift moratorium re OSW in eastern GOM and SE Atlantic
  • Authorize OSW leasing in territories
  • For 10 years: must complete 60M+ ac O&G lease sale in yr prior to any OSW lease issuance
  • Extend Renewable Electricity PTC to 2024; after, tech-neutral PTC: $.015 / kWh + bonuses
  • Extend and replace energy investment tax credits

​

​

16 of 22

�Legislative Update�Energy Independence & Security Act of 2022

Clean Water Act 401 Water Quality Certification

  • Clarifying that the scope of review is limited to state/tribal water quality requirements (not, e.g., air quality impacts) affected by the permitted activity (not only the discharge;
  • Codifying the four types of agency response enumerated in the 2022 proposed rule;
  • Requires states to publish clear application requirements or default to EPA requirements;
  • Requires states and federal agencies to agree on the review timeline within 30 days of receipt of an application, or else default to a 180 day time limit;
  • Prohibits withdrawal and resubmission to restart the review clock.

​

17 of 22

�Legislative Update�Energy Independence & Security Act of 2022

Energy Projects of Strategic National Importance

  • Designation of 25 energy projects of strategic national importance; minimum #s
  • Threshold: NEPA doc, 2+ agencies, $250M= cost; “sufficient financial support”
  • EO to direct expedited review; 2 yr / 1 yr / 180 day time limits – aspirational
  • IRA funding to the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council

​

FAST-41

  • Add mining projects to environmental review dashboard
  • Reduce energy projects threshold: $200M -> $50M
  • Track five-year oil & gas program on dashboard

​

18 of 22

�Legislative Update�Energy Independence & Security Act of 2022

Other Provisions

  • Allows FERC review of transmission projects national interest designation
  • Allows eminent domain on state land
  • Approve Mountain Valley Pipeline

​

Procedural Posture

  • Supported by leadership as part of deal to pass the Inflation Reduction Act
  • Inclusion in a continuing resolution

​

Impacts on Coastal Programs

  • Accelerate NEPA reviews; introduce FAST-41 changes to process
  • Codifies some 401 provisions affecting federal consistency

19 of 22

�Legislative Update�Offshore Reform Acts

BREEZE Act

Bipartisan Renewable, Efficient Energy with Zero Effluent Act

​

RISEE Act

Reinvesting In Shoreline Economies and Ecosystems Act

20 of 22

��Call Scheduling

Wednesday, November 30, 2022

Wednesday, December 7, 2022

21 of 22

Next Call

November 30, 2022

22 of 22

Next Call

December 7, 2022