1 of 41

Oscillating Features in the Neutron Electromagnetic Structure

Speaker:Jifeng Hu (on behalf of BESIII Collaboration)

Affiliation:Institute of quantum matter, South China Normal University

2 of 41

Motivation

Major components of visible matter

Key of understanding the strong interaction

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

2

3 of 41

Before Discovery of the Neutron

1896 β radiation, Henri Becquerel, Marie/Pierre Curie

1919 discovery of the proton, Ernest Rutherford

1932 discovery of the neutron, James Chadwick

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

3

4 of 41

Discovery of the Neutron (1932)

Sir Ernest Rutherford's laboratory

early technique

https://www.nature.com/articles/129312a0.pdf

《Possible existence of a Neutron》

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

4

5 of 41

Electron Scattering (1950s)

Hofstadter R. etc., “electron scattering and nuclear structure” Rev. Mod. Phys. 28, 214–254 (1956)

Over a period of time lasting at least two thousand years, Man has puzzled over and sought an understanding of the composition of matter. … Indeed this structure may be quite complex, so that the elegant idea of elementarity must be abandoned.

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

5

6 of 41

Electromagnetic Form Factor

  • A parameterized function depending on the momentum transfer q2.
  • Imaging the nucleon structure using the electromagnetic probe q2.

Point-like scattered by point-like

The structured scattered by point-like

|F(q)|2≡1

Spin=0

Spin=½

|F(q)|2

dσ/dΩMott

Hofstadter R. etc., Rev. Mod. Phys. 28, 214–254 (1956)

Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.59:694-764,2007

Simplest observable

 

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

6

7 of 41

Developments

Laboratoire de l’Acc´elerateur Lin´eaire in Orsay (1956)

Cambridge Electron Accelerator (1962)

Electron-Synchrotron at Bonn (1963)

Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (1962) BaBar

Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (1959)

Electron accelerators at CEA-Saclay (1945)

Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge Energie Fysica (1975)

Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) of the Jefferson Lab

DAΦNE, KLOE, FENICE

Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (1999) CESR (1979)

CLEO

Beijing Electron-positron Collider (1988)

Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex 

High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (1997) in Tsukuba

The Mainz Microtron MAMI

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

7

8 of 41

Experiments

q2<0

Scattering experiment

Livingston, M. S., & Shurcliff, W. A. (1961). The Cambridge Electron Accelerator. Science, 134(3486), 1186–1193. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1707819

q2>0

Annihilation experiment

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

8

9 of 41

Space-like versus Time-like

Dispersion relation

 

Borrowed from Prof. Olsen’s talk.

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

9

10 of 41

The γ*-Nucleon Coupling Puzzle (1998)

Nucl. Phys. B 517, 3 (1998).

Phys. Rev. D 90, 112007 (2014).

EPJ Web Conf. 212, 07007 (2019).

A puzzle for over 20 years

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

10

11 of 41

Predictions before FENICE

Model

Year

QCD sum rules

Brodsky, 1972

Baryon leading quark+diquark

0.06 @ q^2 = 25 GeV^2

Chernjak 1983

Hyer 1992

EVDM ρ + ω

~14

Cabibbo, 1961

Veneziano Rec

~2

Koerner

PDG Rec.

~100

Voci ,1982

Unitary Amplitude

~25

Dubnicka, 1988

Unitary Amplitude

<1

Dubnicka, 1992

NN strong FSI

<=1 @threshold

Dalkarov, 1992

Meshcheryakov 1993

U Spin invariance

>1 @ q^2~4-5 GeV^2

Biagini, 1991

http://personalpages.to.infn.it/~feliciel/pub/mySlides/HS96.pdf

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

11

12 of 41

Precision Era

was out

Borrowed from Prof. Olsen’s talk.

does BESIII address something new ?

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

12

13 of 41

The BEPCII Collider

BEPCII is a high luminosity collider.

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

13

14 of 41

The BESIII Experiment

Babar

Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 614, 345 (2010)

A precision frontier experiment under running in tau-charm energy region.

MDC

TOF

EMC

MUC

SC

Wire chamber

Scintillator

CsI crystal

RPC

1.0 T

1.5 T

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

14

15 of 41

China (48/367)

Institute of High Energy Physics (146), other units(221): Beijing Institute of Petro-chemical Technology, Beihang University,

China Center of Advanced Science and Technology, Fudan University,

Guangxi Normal University, Guangxi University,

Hangzhou Normal University, Henan Normal University,

Henan University of Science and Technology,

Huazhong Normal University, Huangshan College, Hunan University,

Hunan Normal University, Henan University of Technology

Institute of modern physics, Jilin University, Lanzhou University, Liaoning Normal University, Liaoning University, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing University, Nankai University, North China Electric Power University,

Peking University, Qufu normal university, Shanxi University,

Shanxi Normal University, Sichuan University, Shandong Normal University,

Shandong University, Shanghai Jiaotong Univeristy, Soochow University,

South China Normal University, Southeast University, Sun Yat-sen University,

Tsinghua University, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Jinan, University of Science and Technology of China,

University of Science and Technology Liaoning,

University of South China, Wuhan University, Xinyang Normal University,

Zhejiang University, Zhengzhou University,YunNan University , China University of Geosciences

Europe (17/115)

Germany (6): Bochum University,

GSI Darmstadt, Helmholtz Institute Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Universitaet Giessen,University of Münster Italy (3): Ferrara University, INFN, University of TorinoNetherlands (1):KVI/University of Groningen

Russia (2): Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Dubna JINR

Sweden (1):Uppsala University

Turkey (1):Turkish Accelerator Center Particle Factory GroupUK (2): University of Manchester, University of Oxford

Poland (1)National Centre for Nuclear Research

USA(4/8)Carnegie Mellon University�Indiana UniversityUniversity of HawaiiUniversity of Minnesota

~500 members

From 76 institutions in 16 countries

Asia (6/10)

Pakistan (2): COMSATS Institute of Information Technology

University of the Punjab, University of Lahore

Mongolia (1): Institute of Physics and Technology

Korea (1): Chung-Ang University

India (1): Indian Institute of Technology madras

Thailand (1): Suranaree University of Technology

South America (1/1)� Chile: University of Tarapaca

BESIII Collaboration

Borrowed from Prof. Li Hai-bo’s talk.

16 of 41

Access to Time-like Form Factor

Energy scan

Initial-state-radiation

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

16

17 of 41

Taking Data

688 pb-1 R-scan data and 10 billion J/Ψ data.

Sampling 22 energies, 688 pb-1 7 energies 7460 pb-1

2.0 GeV

2.05

3.02

3.08

3.773

...

4.60

Borrowed from Prof. Li Hai-bo’s talk.

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

17

18 of 41

Taking Data

[GeV]

2011 tau mass scan, 2012 R scan, 2013-2014 R scan phase 2, 2014-2015 R scan phase 1.

[亿]

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

18

19 of 41

How to Measure ?

3. Translationσ to |G|

1. Experimental Cross-section

2. Theoretical Cross-section

Hunt …

Assumption

This talk demonstrates effective form factor |G|.

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

19

20 of 41

Signal features

Main Drift Chamber (MDC)

Time-of-Flight Detector (TOF)

Electromagnetic calorimeter (EMC)

Muon Chamber (MUC)

The analysis team developed new reconstruction packages for neutral events, making use of EMC+TOF+MUC.

TOF Scintillators

EMC Crystals

TOF Scintillators

Time of flight,

Path of flight

 

The coincidence

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

20

21 of 41

1. Optimization: three categories

Use TOF reconstruction

Use MUC rejection

  1. mutually exclusive categories 2. maximize the signal yields 3. cross-check with each measurement

 

 

 

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

21

22 of 41

2. Verification of Selection Logic

e+e- 🡪 γγ@2.125 GeV

e+e- 🡪 γγ

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

22

23 of 41

2. Verification of Selection Logic

Time of flight

crossing angle

Using BDT

crossing angle

PDG

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

23

24 of 41

3. Efficiency & Radiation Correction

efficiencies are checked with two ways:

  1. an exclusive MC simulation sample,
  2. weighted by a control sample.

Sample1: MC simulation with ISR photons

(NLO)

Sample 2: MC simulation only the leading order

(LO)

 

Event selections for category A

 

 

Suppose we observed the number of events :Nobs

The selection efficiency is defined to be:

 

Thus the BORN cross-section is obtained:

The radiation function:

PDF(E) must be already known.

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

24

25 of 41

3. Efficiency Calibration

The precision reaches down to <2% for the efficiency calibration of both antineutron and neutron.

 

 

obtained from MC simulation

and corrected with data

 

obtained from data

 

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

25

26 of 41

4. Extraction of Signal Yields

 

 

 

Time of flight

crossing angle

Using BDT

crossing angle

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

26

27 of 41

Results of Three Categories

i = A, B, C

We combine 3 categories to get the best measurement.

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

27

28 of 41

Cross-sections and Form Factors

    • 1st highlight of the results: most precise in the time-like region.
    • The precision improved > a factor of ~30 over previous results.

(a) Cross-section (b) Effective Form Factor

Nature Physics volume 17, p1200–1204 (2021)

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

28

29 of 41

Cross-section Ratios

    • 2nd highlight of the results: precise ratios in 2.0~3.08 GeV.
    • Clearly clarifying the photo-nucleon interaction puzzle.

PRL. 124 (2020) no.4, 042001 

[8]: Phys. Rev. D 99, no. 1, 014510 (2019); [10]: Z. Phys. C 52, 631 (1991).; [11]: Phys. Rept. 112, 173420 (1984)

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

29

30 of 41

Oscillation in the Form Factors

    • 3rd highlight of the results: oscillation around the dipole law.
    • A phase shift around (125±12)° is observed.

PRC 93, 035201 (2016).

PRL 114, 232301 (2015).

PRD 92, 198 034018 (2015).

 

Nobody predicted this

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

30

31 of 41

Understanding the Form Factor

Charge density distribution (Fourier transformation), or time-space revolution (generalized Fourier transformation).

Physics Reports 550–551 (2015) 1–103

proton

Semi-classical:

Generalized:

 

 

 

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

31

32 of 41

Understanding the Form Factor

Quark-antiquark creation and transition to nucleon, and effective coupling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

32

33 of 41

Understanding the Form Factor

N = p, n, Λ, Σ ...

Leading order

Unique access to non-stable baryons in the TL region at BESIII.

 

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

33

34 of 41

A Story of the Nucleon Picture

A point particle

Before 1936

A structured particle

1950s

3 valence quark model

1964

Spin crisis

1988

valence quark + sea quark + gluon revolution

recent

Charge radius puzzle

2020

The interaction puzzle

2021

But the story has no ending

BESIII achieved a mile stone in understanding the neutron.

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

34

35 of 41

From Idea to Fruit

3. Data analysis,publication

2016-2021

2. Taking data

2012-2015

1. Proposal and data-taking plan

Before 2012

Carrying out a typical research @BESIII

 

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

35

36 of 41

Summary

For the neutron time-like form factor, BESIII collaboration

  1. released novel results with the best precision so far.
  2. clarified the interaction puzzle persistent for over 20 years.
  3. observed an oscillating behavior similar to the one in the proton.

Thanks for your attention

More work needed to dig out the implication from our data

Acknowledgement to the owners because some pictures are borrowed from the internet without any contact.

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

36

37 of 41

Appendix

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

37

38 of 41

The Proton Time-like Form Factor

PRL 124, 042001 (2020)

PRD 99, 092002 (2019)

PRD 91, 112004 (2015)

Most precise measurements in the time-like region

The Proton

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

38

39 of 41

1st Precise Separation GE from GM

Precision: |GE| 2-94%, |GM| 1.5-9%

the precision comparable to the one in spacelike region

 

PRL 124, 042001 (2020)

The Proton

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

39

40 of 41

Confirmation

Oscillation exists and needs more understanding.

Gosc

 

The Proton

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

40

41 of 41

Periodic Interference Structures

 

PRL 114 (2015) no.23, 232301

 

 

Nobody predicted this

BaBar Data

The Proton

Berkeley Lab 2021-12-22

41