1 of 35

Publication Misconduct: Definition, Concept, Problems that Lead to Unethical Behaviour and Vice Versa

Dr. Dushyant Nimavat

Professor in English,

Department of English, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad

Email-dushyantnimavat76@gmail.com

2 of 35

Why honesty in research?

3 of 35

Universities today

  • Between 40 and 70 percent of all college students have admitted cheating.

(India Today. Special Issue on Higher Education -February 2019)

  • Researchers have identified factors that influence dishonest behavior:

-competition and pressure

-faculty perceived as uncaring or indifferent

-lax attitude of faculty toward dishonesty

-peer pressure to support a friend; and

-campus culture is tolerant of dishonesty.

timesofindia.indiatimes.com/edit-page/If-you-are...plagiarism..

4 of 35

What Is Academic Integrity?

  • Honesty to oneself and others
  • Trust and open communication between students and faculty
  • Fair treatment and mutual respect between faculty and students
  • Personal responsibility to assist in preventing cheating.

The Clemson University International Center for Academic Integrity . (October 1999).

The fundamental values of academic integrity.

5 of 35

Ethics

  • One can observe the ethical behaviour through the habits.�- sincerity, honesty� -truthfulness� -respect for self and others� -respect for time� -respect for work� -respect for our environment

6 of 35

Why Ethics in Research?

  • Need to discuss “unethical studies” – led to the development of Ethical Codes and Regulations

  • Nazi Medical Experiments in Germany.

7 of 35

Nazi Medical Experiments

  • 1933 to 1945 – unethical activities implemented by the Germans in Europe

  • Programs included:
  • Sterilization
  • Euthanasia
  • numerous experiments to produce the pure Germans & Aryans

8 of 35

Conflicts of Ethics

    • People may disagree on ‘ethics’ because it is based on people's personal value systems

    • What one person considers to be ‘good’ or ‘right’ may be considered ‘bad’ or ‘wrong’ by another person

9 of 35

Publication�

  • A publication is defined as anything that has been published make that content available to the general public.

Example: A research paper, a article etc.

Key:

  • A research paper describes the output of research.
  • It accelerates for your further research activities

10 of 35

Why is Publication needed? What is its importance ?�

  • Writing is the most important means for
  • communicating scientific work.
  • Research and publication complement teaching and training, clinical care, and public health
  • works.
  • Publication in peer-reviewed journals also gives international recognition for an individual, department, university, and institutions.
  • It enhances your research findings and work

11 of 35

Misconduct- General Aspect�

  • In law, misconduct is wrongful, improper, or unlawful conduct motivated by premeditated or intentional purpose to the consequences of one's acts.
  • Misconduct can be considered an unacceptable or improper behaviour, especially for a professional person.

12 of 35

Publication Misconduct�

  • Publication misconduct includes plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, inappropriate authorship and duplicate submission/multiple submissions.

13 of 35

Why does this happen??

  • Force, no time, deadline, lack of

interest, conflict of interest etc.

14 of 35

Forms or types of Publication�Misconduct�

  • Plagiarism
  • Fabrication
  • Falsification
  • Inappropriate authorship
  • Duplicate submission or Multiple
  • submissions
  • Overlapping publication
  • Salami publication

15 of 35

16 of 35

Fabrication�

  • Fabrication is the practice of making up data or results without having performed relevant research.

17 of 35

Falsification:�

  • Falsification is the practice of changing data or results intentionally such that misleading conclusion is derived.

18 of 35

Inappropriate authorship

  • Authorship is not appropriately assigned based on the author’s contributions.

 Honorary authorship

 Courtesy authorship

 Guest authorship

 Ghost authorship

19 of 35

Duplicate submission/multiple submissions�

  • Duplicate submission/multiple submissions refers to practice of submitting the same manuscript or several manuscripts with minor differences.

(e.g., differences only in title, keywords, abstract, author order, author affiliations, or a small amount of text) to two or more journals at the same time, or submitting to another journal within an agreed or stipulated period.

20 of 35

21 of 35

Overlapping publication�

  • Overlapping publication refers to the practice of publishing a paper overlaps substantially with one already published or submitted.

22 of 35

Salami publication

  • Salami publication refers to the practice of slicing data from a large study, could have been reported in a single paper, into different pieces and publishing them in two or more articles, all of which cover the same population, methods, and question.

23 of 35

Case Study�

24 of 35

25 of 35

26 of 35

Academic Publication

  • Academic publishing depends, to a great extent, on trust.
  • Editors trust peer reviewers to provide fair assessments, authors trust
  • Editors to select appropriate peer reviewers, and readers put their trust in
  • the peer-review process.
  • Academic publishing also occurs in an environment of powerful
  • intellectual, financial, and sometimes political interests that may collide or compete.

27 of 35

  • Good decisions and strong editorial processes designed to manage these interests will foster a sustainable and efficient publishing system, which will benefit academic societies, journal editors, authors, research funders, readers, and publishers.
  • Good publication practices do not develop by chance, and will become established only if they are actively promoted.

28 of 35

TRANSPARENCY�

29 of 35

30 of 35

31 of 35

32 of 35

33 of 35

Conclusion�

  • Generally academic misconduct likely more prevalent & severe as benefits of misconduct higher, costs lower and detection risk is lower
  • Factors increasing benefit of misconduct
  • Increasing publication pressure
  • Overburdened reviewers
  • Co-authors who are happy to score additional publication

  • Possible remedies against misconduct
  • Good mentoring
  • Appropriately trained support staff
  • Blinded assessment of data
  • Data review
  • Effective internal and external committees
  • Strong departmental leadership

34 of 35

Links which will help�

  • https://publicationethics.org/files/retractionguidelines.

Pdf

  • https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20gu
  • idelines.pdf
  • https://publicationethics.org/
  • https://www.biomedcentral.com/getpublished/editorial-policies
  • https://www.biomedcentral.com/authors/biomede ditors
  • http://www.icmje.org/
  • http://www.wame.org/
  • https://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policie
  • s/b3/17c.pdf

35 of 35