1 of 26

Group work, participation, and neurodiversity

Facilitated by Sarah Silverman

1

2 of 26

Welcome and notes

I am excited to learn with you today!

  • This session is scheduled to last 1.5 hours. There will be a scheduled break after about 45 min.
  • Use your time, space, and tech however you want
  • Please welcome LaDawna, who will provide captioning
  • You are invited to use the slides and handout however you would like
  • The links to the outline and slides are found at:

Slides: https://tinyurl.com/Aug20Slides

Handout: https://tinyurl.com/Aug20Handout

2

3 of 26

How to participate today and after

  • Note: I invite and welcome your participation, but I do also respect your decision to just be present and not make your experience visible to me
  • Options to engage include
    • Zoom chat
    • Typing on session handout
    • Participating in a break-out room and using mic to talk
    • Turning on mic and talking (at the end during the period reserved for questions)
    • Emailing me after the session to talk more
    • Sharing ideas with others after the session

3

4 of 26

About me

  • My name is Sarah and I use she/her pronouns
  • Description: White woman with short brown hair and metal glasses frames (today I am wearing black pants and a blue jacket)
  • I teach instructional design and disability studies
  • I have done faculty development and instructional design support for about 7 years
  • I am Autistic - so I have a personal connection to neurodiversity
  • My research interests include accessible and feminist pedagogy, UDL, and neurodiversity history and theory

4

5 of 26

About you

Please feel free to share your choice of:

  • Name
  • Campus or other organization
  • Role (instructor, student, librarian, advisor, other)
  • What brought you here today

5

6 of 26

Goals and Agenda

Goals

  • Reflect on why issues of collaborative learning
  • Consider the ideas of “kairotic space” and “talk-intensive activities” to help describe some of the challenges that can arise in highly-social class activities
  • Define and apply the “double empathy problem” and the “neurodiversity paradigm”
  • Practice reframing common challenging teaching scenarios using the “neurodiversity paradigm”
  • Apply discussion protocols with the goal of expanding the definition of class participation

Agenda

  • Welcome, information, and introductions (10 min)
  • Framing ideas (10 min)
  • Feminist pedagogy and Universal Design for Learning (5 min)
  • Neurodiversity paradigm, and the double empathy problem (15 min)
  • Activity: Discussion protocols and reframing scripts (15 min)
  • Activity debrief (10 min)
  • Wrap up (5 min)
  • Q+A if time (10 min)

6

7 of 26

Why this topic?

I often do guest talks and consulting on higher ed campuses and receive a lot of questions about highly social and or collaborative class elements, in which neurodiversity seems to pose a challenge or create friction.

Here are some questions I often get…

7

8 of 26

“How should I structure group work to be more inclusive of neurodivergent students?”

“Some of my neurodivergent students are asking to be exempted from group work – how should I respond to this request?”

“Students with and without documented disabilities are expressing apprehension about class participation - how can I navigate this sensitively?”

8

What experiences do you think inspired these questions? (You can respond in chat or on page 2 of handout)

9 of 26

Some definitions to work with

Neurodiversity: The naturally occurring variation in human cognition

Neurodivergent students and staff: May have a diagnosis/identity of Autism, ADHD, Learning Disability, Dyslexia, Anxiety, Depression, or another diagnosis OR may have no diagnosis. Neurodivergence is a sociological concept rather than a biomedical one.

Group work: Any class activity that requires or invites students to work and learn with other students. Sometimes referred to as collaborative learning or team-based learning

Class participation: What students do during class time to demonstrate their engagement. Often carries expectations of spontaneous verbal participation.

9

10 of 26

10

Group work

Class participation

Kairotic Space

High-stakes spaces of a highly social nature - class discussions, group projects, office hours, and more. These are difficult for students with mental disabilities to navigate

Price (2011)

Talk-intensive group activities

Marginalized students can experience social exclusion in the context of group work, being positioned in negative and deficit-based ways by their fellow students

Rios (2024)

11 of 26

A common, but challenging framing of “participation”

“While attendance is required for this class, it is important to do more than just attend, because participation is important for learning and we need everyone to participate in order to have a lively class discussion. Please plan to speak at least 2 times during each class period. 20% of your final grade will be based on the quality of your in-class contributions.”

What about this class setup could be challenging to navigate?

11

12 of 26

Three ideas that could help us navigate

12

Feminist pedagogy

Neurodiversity Paradigm

Universal Design for Learning

13 of 26

Three ideas that could help us navigate

13

Feminist pedagogy

One of our goals is to learn through sharing our own experiences and learning from the experiences of others

Neurodiversity Paradigm

There is no one “right” way to think, behave, or communicate

Universal Design for Learning

There is no average learner - design for variability

14 of 26

Feminist Pedagogy and Universal Design for Learning

Universal Design for Learning (UDL): There is no average learner - design for learning variability. This teaching framework was initially developed to encourage the design of learning experiences that would be accessible to many types of students without modifications of “retrofits”

Feminist pedagogy: A teaching approach which seeks to connect social justice concerns to the classroom, break down the student-teacher hierarchy, and draw on student experiences as a key source of knowledge.

“Foregrounding the personal aspects of learning […] can be profoundly unsettling for both students and teachers as it forces a class to develop protocols for sharing sensitive information and to practice compassionate listening and positive critique.” - Shafali Lal (2000)

14

15 of 26

Working definition of the term “Neurodiversity”

The range of differences in individual brain function and behavioral traits, regarded as part of normal variation in the human population

16 of 26

Where did the term “neurodiversity” come from?

  • Has multiple points of origin and was developed by the online autistic community
  • Concept originated on the “Independent Living listserv” in the 1990s
  • Also mentioned in Time Magazine by writer Harvey Blume
  • General concept was discussed concurrently by other various activists
    • E.g. INVL listserv poster Tony Langdon wrote about a “‘neurological diversity of people. i.e. the atypical among a society provide the different perspectives needed to generate new ideas and advances, whether they be technological, cultural, artistic or otherwise.”

16

17 of 26

The Neurodiversity Paradigm

Neurodiversity paradigm is a set of principles (quoted from Dr. Nick Walker’s book Neuroqueer Heresies)

  1. Neurodiversity – the diversity among minds – is a natural, healthy, and valuable form of human diversity.�
  2. There is no “normal” or “right” style of human mind, any more than there is one “normal” or “right” ethnicity, gender, or culture.�
  3. The social dynamics that manifest in regard to neurodiversity are similar to the social dynamics that manifest in regard to other forms of human diversity (e.g., diversity of race, culture, gender, or sexual orientation). These dynamics include the dynamics of social power relations – the dynamics of social inequality, privilege, and oppression – as well as the dynamics by which diversity, when embraced, acts as a source of creative potential within a group or society.

17

18 of 26

The double empathy problem

Coined by autistic psychologist Damian Milton in a 2012 article (see references).

Stereotypical understanding of autistic people

“Autistic people struggle to understand other people’s thoughts and motivations, struggle to pick up on social cues, and thus struggle overall with communication and social interactions.”

Double empathy problem

Autistic people may have difficulty understanding the thoughts, motivations, and behaviors of non-autistic people but non-autistic people also struggle to understand the thoughts, motivations, and behaviors of autistic people, and often do not feel that they are obligated to try

18

19 of 26

A generalization of the “double empathy” problem

People have differing ways of communicating and interacting, including various strengths and challenges

Whether something is a strength or challenge is highly dependent on context and norms

Successful communication and collaboration will likely depend on learning more about how other people think, what their communication style is, and how to interpret their behavior

This process might involve some trial and error, and will definitely require humility and patience

19

20 of 26

Teaching in the neurodiversity paradigm

The neurodiversity paradigm tells us that there is no one right way to think, behave, or communicate

Because teaching and learning involve thinking, behavior, and communication, the neurodiversity paradigm might suggest that there is no one right way to teach or learn either.

Learning from the double empathy concept, people don’t always automatically understand each other's behavior and communication - which is not a “problem.” Growing this understanding is an opportunity.

20

21 of 26

Short break + introduction to activity

21

22 of 26

Discussion protocols: A possible strategy

  • Discussion protocols are more-detailed scripts or structures for class discussions or group interactions
  • A discussion protocol has the potential to build in structure that help students and instructors learn more about their fellow learning community members
  • Among other things, they can surface the kind of differences in thinking and communication the understanding of which can support successful collaboration
    • E.g. There can be parts of a discussion protocol that ask group members to ask questions about and offer information about their motivations, thoughts patterns, intentions, and communication styles

22

23 of 26

Activity option 1: Explore and or try a discussion protocol

This activity can be completed in a group of 3 or 4, or on your own. Breakout groups will be opened and you can join one.

Read the discussion protocol on page 3 of your handout. Select one person to share their teaching/learning challenge, and then continue with the protocol as written.

23

24 of 26

Activity option 2: Reframing some common teaching challenges

This activity can be completed in a group of 3 or 4, or on your own. Breakout groups will be opened and you can join one.

You can review some anecdotal concerns from students and instructors. Drawing on the themes we have discussed today, you are invited to share some potential reframings of these challenges.

My own potential reframings are available on page 5. Your ideas an mine may not match exactly, which is ok!

24

25 of 26

Takeaways

25

Feminist pedagogy

Neurodiversity Paradigm

Universal Design for Learning

Not just “multiple ways,” but no one right way.

26 of 26

Wrap up, feedback, and staying in touch

  • I thank each of you for creating this learning community today, and being generous sharing your experiences and ideas
  • Your donation to help cover the costs of captioning and my time is appreciated! Links to donate are found at the top of the handout via Venmo and paypal.
  • There is a link to a feedback form on the top of the handout
  • Feel free to stay in touch. I invite you to email me, connect on LinkedIn, or check out my website (links on the top of the handout)

Until we meet again….

26