1 of 52

Socially Just Education: A South African Perspective

A/Prof Daniela Gachago, daniela.gachago@uct.ac.za

15th of April 2024

2 of 52

Overview

From Equality to Equity to Social Justice

Social Justice - a South African perspective

The problem with Learning Design

Towards a Compassionate Learning Design

Example from my own practice

Final thoughts

2

3 of 52

Layout options

3

4 of 52

Social Justice - a SA perspective

Global influences: neoliberalism, commercialisation of T&L, metrification of knowledge, economic downturn/austerity measures

Between a rock and hard place: excellence and social redress (Swartz et al, 2019)

Student protests: call for decolonisation of curricula

Wider and more nuanced definition of diversity / importance of context

Transformation: both personal and systemic

4

5 of 52

My own practice as a learning designer

Source: www.freepik.com

5

6 of 52

Source: Retegi, A., Sauvage, B., Predan, B., Tomás, E., Schosswohl, G., Kaltenbrunner, M., & Draganovská, D. (2019). The Co-create Handbook for Creative Professionals. Co-Create Consortium.http://www.cocreate.training

7 of 52

Human-centred design

8 of 52

8

9 of 52

Design is a living practice, not a done thing. It is a medium for building relationship between ourselves and those who will benefit from or be harmed by our design choices; and as such, design is iterative, a praxis—a process of doing, examining, reflecting, doing... and of never getting so set in our ways that we forget there are always new things to try”. (Morris, 2021)

9

10 of 52

“At the core of co-design is participation. Genuine participation means ethical commitment to include all the voices, including marginalized groups that could be affected by decision-making.”

(Co-Create Basics)

10

11 of 52

Co-design

  • ...attempt to actively involve all stakeholders in the design process to help ensure the result meets their needs.
  • ….enabling a wide range of people to make a creative contribution in the formulation and solution of a problem.
  • ...developing processes for understanding, developing and supporting mutual learning between multiple participants in collective decision-making and collective design;
  • ...a transparent process of value creation with end-users playing a central role.

12 of 52

13 of 52

If we believe design thinking is the right tool to use to redesign products, systems, and institutions to be more equitable, �then we must redesign the design thinking process, mindsets and tools themselves to ensure they mitigate for the causes of inequity -

the prejudices of the human designers in the process, both their explicit and implicit personal biases, and the power of mostly invisible status quo systems of oppression... �

(EquityXDesign, 2016)

14 of 52

eXd framework

3 Beliefs:

5 Design principles:

Historical Context (See)

Radical Inclusion (Be Seen)

Process as Product (Foresee)

Design at the margins

Start with yourself

Cede Power

Make the invisible visible

Speak to the future

15 of 52

Who we are directly affects our

design decisions.

16 of 52

Welcome !

Daniela Gachago, Maha Bali and Nicola Pallitt

17 of 52

‘Compassion is a cultivated feeling about emotion. It is a place where how we feel, how we think, and how we act come together. In other words, compassion is a cultivated practice, not an isolated, rational judgement about the world.’ (Curtin, 2014, loc. 1101)

‘[compassion] goes beyond the feeling-for or feeling-with an individual and moves towards understanding the social and political structures of our society. This then is much more than ‘putting oneself in the other’s shoes’, but assumes responsibility for one’s own role in somebody else’s story. It creates urgency for practice, for action.’ (Segal, 2007)

Com/passion

18 of 52

19 of 52

‘We define compassion within the context of learning design along four dimensions: a desire to create more participative spaces, a recognition of power and positionality and how this affects our ability to participate and finally a centreing of care and affect in the learning process.”

20 of 52

Participation

How do you know what your students need? How do you start to find out?

What have you found out? What surprised you? What else would you like to find out?

What would you like not to find out? What are your boundaries?

21 of 52

Student as Partners

“Co-creation of the curriculum [is a] process of student engagement that encourages students and staff members to become partners, each with a voice and a stake in curriculum development” (Lubicz-Nawrocka, 2017).

22 of 52

Healey, 2014

Bovill, 2017; 2020

23 of 52

From designing with empathy to co-designing with compassion based on Wehipeihana (2013)

24 of 52

Justice

Once you have found out who your students are and what they need, how does that impact your teaching and their learning? What have you done to respond to your diverse students’ needs? What are examples of how you have made your interactions with students more equitable? What challenges have you encountered?

25 of 52

What is social justice?

Social justice is a concept that requires the organisation of social arrangements that make it possible for everyone to participate equally in society. Fraser (2005) considers social justice as ‘participatory parity’ economically, culturally and politically.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Social_Justice_Pride_Flag.png

26 of 52

Justice

An understanding of power and positionality and how that affects our ability to participate

27 of 52

Identity-Based Socially Ascribed Power Graph

Visualize Power

light skin

dark skin

english first

english second

young

old

rich

poor

gender conforming

gender nonconforming

able bodied

disabled

male

female

straight

lgbtqia+

christian

non christian

college educated

non-college educated

documented

undocumented

28 of 52

Care

Care for self and others

Care as personal and systemic

Is care always good care?

29 of 52

Joan Tronto’s ethic of care (1990, 1993, 2001, 2013)

  • Centring care as a political project (2013)
  • More than just a disposition - but a ethical practice
  • Rather than looking at big ethical dilemmas - it is in our everyday practices of caring for ourselves and others that we most need to consider and practice ethical behaviour (2001)
  • Care that can be intentionally designed ?. �

Joan Tronto (1993). Moral Boundaries:

A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.

30 of 52

Ethics of Care defined

...a species activity that includes everything that we do to maintain, continue, and repair our ‘world’ so that we can live in it as well as possible. That world includes our bodies, our selves, and our environment, all of which we seek to interweave in a complex, life-sustaining web (see Tronto 1993, 103; Fisher and Tronto 1990, 40).

31 of 52

Bali & Zamora: Equity/Care matrix (2023)

32 of 52

Examples of Participation, Justice and Care in my own practice

32

33 of 52

Example 1: Ungrading in an PGDIP course

  • One of four modules in the PGDIP in EdTech at UCT
  • Online Learning Design
  • Practical-oriented / authentic / design of intervention for students’ own context
  • Iterative design
  • 2021: major redesign and introduction of ungrading
    • open structure
    • design on the go
    • portfolio oriented: checklist of task to be submitted
    • flexible deadlines

34 of 52

I liked what [the facilitators] were doing, you know, that whenever you're suggesting something, they would add it right there. And then in front of you, and that will be part of the course you know, for the following groups, that slide was going to be used. I liked that. So it changed my mind that one has not doesn't have to be rigid, they have to be flexible.(course participant)

Govender, Immenga and Gachago (under review): Inclusion and Equity in Higher Education: Designing for Complexity and Uncertainty

34

35 of 52

If I think about specific people I would hazard that the people who “took the most out” of the course were people who already had a postgraduate qualification, who came from historically advantaged, culturally white/liberal educational backgrounds, and who were able to adopt the linguistic and attitudinal markers that pointed to “successful" learning in the course. Students who either came from more conservative institutions, or who held more traditional beliefs about teaching and learning, or who did not have extensive exposure to progressive discourses around teaching and learning in many ways found the course difficult to find their feet in, and even more difficult to succeed in.” (facilitator)

Govender, Immenga and Gachago (under review): Inclusion and Equity in Higher Education: Designing for Complexity and Uncertainty

35

36 of 52

37 of 52

Example 2: Co-creating a 3rd year UG Commerce course

  • A 3rd year course taught to all business science students (F +/- 300; S +/- 350 students)
  • Introduces students to individual and team issues that may arise in the world of work
  • Traditionally been taught with reference to organisational behaviour theories and practices developed in the global North
  • Assumption that these have equal relevance in the Southern African context

38 of 52

Focus groups and redesign workshops

  • August to December 2021
  • First implemented iteration January 2022
  • Began with 4 focus groups of 1 hr each with diverse stakeholders (n = 55)
  • Questions: what people related challenges do you confront in your workplace, what do graduates struggle with, ,how can organisations contribute to fairer societies through their people management
  • Thematically analysed the data

39 of 52

Equity-oriented pedagogy for diverse partners in the co-creation of knowledge

  • 5 learning design workshops:
      • Personas, knowledge trees, creating learning outcomes for each of the persona’s knowledge trees, storyboarding process
  • Goal : Offer students an opportunity to grapple with real, lived people management issues

40 of 52

That diversity of people that made up the group. And that you had both academics and people in corporates and in NPOs. That gave me a different perspective on some of the concepts that I thought I was familiar with. Just getting a different understanding or lens on these concepts and hearing it from people who are practically applying these in their day-to-day work or activities, so that for me was quite valuable and I enjoyed that.” (design participant)

(Jaga, Gachago & Farista, in press: Designing with others - reflections on a co-created learning design process to decolonise People Management)

40

41 of 52

Facilitator’s reflection

“...I was with two white women and I sensed I needed to step in as there was a bit of this white privilege or white bias coming up. And I thought like now I had to say something, but it was also, you know, taken very graciously. So I think there was space to kind of challenge certain [assumptions]…Or at least respond to when people said something that I thought we could unpack a bit more, you know? So I did feel there was some sort of trust to say things that in other spaces might not be possible, might feel uncomfortable, especially with people that…you know, it's not like we had created trust or we had worked with each other before. It was really… we were thrown into this space online, you know, for a very short period of time. But somehow it worked to be able to speak. And I will, I mean, for me it was about the small groups, and breaking up groups and putting them in many different smaller groups all the time.”

(Jaga, Gachago & Farista, in press: Designing with others - reflections on a co-created learning design process to decolonise People Management)

42 of 52

43 of 52

Example 3: Student-led development of a leadership academy

Student-led design process

Co-creation of workshop and research methodology

Participatory visual action techniques

44 of 52

45 of 52

… our team was intentional about creating an environment where every voice mattered. A space where ideas were nurtured, where students were encouraged to explore uncharted territories of thought that might have otherwise been stifled. This safe space was a testament to the belief that the best solutions arise when everyone has a seat at the table.” (student facilitator)

(Reddy, Roberts, Mosienyane, Gachago & Immenga (draft): Navigating Power Dynamics in Student-Staff Partnerships: EquityXDesign meets Third Spaces in Co-Designing a South African Leadership Programme)

45

46 of 52

When taking the stage, I was not particularly nervous because it was just myself and the team discussing our research during our Thursday meetings and then later fully experiencing our research in action when we had the first DALA iiNkhokeli workshop. After my presentation, it was question time. I expected a few grilling questions as the first part of our team name has connotations of slang, however, the manner in which one of the questions was asked left me quite speechless, initially. When I regained my consciousness I was able to speak clearly even when further questioning arose. It made me realise the gravity of our task but also the power imbalance in every ‘teamwork’ task. Our motto is ‘student as partners’ but when I spoke it did not feel as if I was a partner, rather another student who was being reprimanded because they have not done what was expected of them. The experience was eye-opening in the sense that even when our student voices through this experience were undermined or questioned, we remained steadfast as it is ‘students as partners’ after-all. (student facilitator)

(Reddy, Roberts, Mosienyane, Gachago & Immenga (draft): Navigating Power Dynamics in Student-Staff Partnerships: EquityXDesign meets Third Spaces in Co-Designing a South African Leadership Programme)

46

47 of 52

48 of 52

Socially Just LD in the South African context?

  • Highly diverse context
  • Much stronger power differentials
  • Call for decolonisation / student led (not just inviting student as partners)
  • Can we actually all participate equally?
  • Importance of process
  • Facilitiation skills / faciltiating difficult conversation as a new skills for learning designers
  • LD as distributed / relational activity involving collaborators inside and outside the institution
  • LD as resistance

49 of 52

third space as a place of reflection, renewal, and change in which two supposedly oppositional worlds are re-imagined to identify tensions, conflicts, exaggerations of distance, commonalities across domains, sources of insight, and inspiration for action(Flessner, 2014, p.236)

(Reddy, Roberts, Mosienyane, Gachago & Immenga (draft): Navigating Power Dynamics in Student-Staff Partnerships: EquityXDesign meets Third Spaces in Co-Designing a South African Leadership Programme)

49

50 of 52

Orientations towards future and �equity-oriented LD �(Gachago, Bali and Pallitt, 2023)

awareness of context,

matter matters,

co-creating with humans and non-humans,

relationality and connection,

modelling vulnerability,

the entanglement of the personal and political,

and creating transformative spaces.

51 of 52

Design is a living practice, not a done thing. It is a medium for building relationship between ourselves and those who will benefit from or be harmed by our design choices; and as such, design is iterative, a praxis—a process of doing, examining, reflecting, doing... and of never getting so set in our ways that we forget there are always new things to try”. (Morris, 2021)

52 of 52

Thank you - any questions?

52