SOW-based vocabulary testing for NCELP Y7�
Principles, design, creation
NCELP Residential 3
Natalie Finlayson / Emma Marsden
Date updated: 02/03/20
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
Outline
2.1 Breadth of knowledge testing
2.2 Depth of knowledge testing
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
1. Vocab testing team
Test leads: Natalie Finlayson & Emma Marsden
French
Test developer
Kirsten Somerville
Proofreader
Ivan Avaca
Spanish
Test developer
Ivan Avaca
Proofreaders
Nick Avery
Pep Mateos Gonzalez
German
Test developers
Inge Alferink
Natalie Finlayson
Proofreaders
Inge Alferink
Natalie Finlayson
With huge thanks to: Giulia Bovolenta, Victoria Hobson, Stephen Owen, Helen Thomas, Catherine Morris, Ciaran Morris, Jack Peacock, Laurence Anthony
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
2. Vocab testing principles
Objectives
To test breadth and depth of knowledge of vocabulary studied in Y7 Terms 1.1.1 - 2.1.1
Considerations
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
2.1 Breadth of knowledge
Objective 1: To find out how many words students know
Sample size
SOW coverage:
French: 43%* Spanish: 35% German: 35%
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
2.1 Breadth of knowledge
Objective 1: To find out how many words students know
Item pool
(French: 2:1:2; Spanish: 3:1:3; German: 2:1:3)
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
2.2 Depth of knowledge
Objective 2: To find out how well students know target words
Year 8+
tested separately
Year 8+
Nation 2013, p. 538
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
2.2 Depth of knowledge
How well do you know the words we have learned so far?
1. I have seen this word before.
2. I know what the word means.
3. I can read the word aloud.
4. I can spell the word correctly.
5. I can use the word in a sentence.
6. I know the gender of nouns.
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
2.2 Depth of knowledge
Recognition tests
Recall
Definitions adapted from Jones (2004)
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
3. Question type 1
Modality
Listening
Type of activity
Spoken meaning recognition
Knowledge tested
Meaning (definition)
Read 2000, Chapter 3
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
3. Question type 2
Modality
Listening
Type of activity
Spoken meaning recognition
Knowledge tested
Meaning (definition) Meaning (association)
Read 2000, Chapter 3
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
3. Question type 3
Modality
Reading
Type of activity
Written meaning recall
Knowledge tested
Meaning (definition)
Read 2000, p. 163
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
3. Question type 4
Modality
Reading
Type of activity
Written meaning recall
Knowledge tested
Meaning (definition)
Use (collocation)
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
3. Question type 5
Modality
Writing
Type of activity
Written form recall
Knowledge tested
Form (written)
Meaning (definition)
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
3. Question type 6
Modality
Writing
Type of activity
Written form recall
Knowledge tested
Form (written)
Meaning (definition)
Use (collocation)
Laufer & Nation 1995
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
3. Question type 7
Modality
Speaking
Type of activity
Spoken form recall
Knowledge tested
Form (spoken)
Meaning (definition)
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
3. Question types
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
3. Question types
80 x test items
Listening
20 x spoken meaning recognition
Reading
20 x written
meaning recall
Writing
20 x written
form recall
Speaking
20 x spoken
form recall
40 x receptive
40 x productive
Bias towards recall:
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
4. Scoring (binary)
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
4. Scoring (tolerance)
For now, after 18 weeks lessons, we are semi-tolerant of article and accent errors,
if lemma (word) is correct
For now, after 18 weeks of lessons, we are tolerant of accent errors and semi-tolerant of article errors
if lemma (word) is correct
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
4. Scoring (tolerance)
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
4. Scoring (tolerance)
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
5. Summary
The NCELP Y7 vocabulary test …
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
References
Cariana, R. B., & Lee, D. (2001). The effects of recognition and recall study tasks with feedback in a computer-based vocabulary lesson. Educational Technology Research & Development 49 (3), pp. 23-36.
Glover, J. A. (1989). The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 392-399.
Jones, L. (2004). Testing L2 vocabulary recognition and recall using pictorial and written test items. Language Learning & Technology 8 (3), pp. 122-143.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary Size and Use Lexical Richness in L2 Written Production. Applied Linguistics, 16, pp. 307-322.
McDaniel, M. A., & Mason, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition 11, pp. 371-385.
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, J. (2014). Do Multiple-Choice Options Inflate Estimates of Vocabulary Size on the VST? Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(3), pp. 271–282. doi:10.1080/15434303.2014.922977
Stewart, J., & White, D. A. (2011). Estimating guessing effects on the vocabulary levels test for differing degrees of word knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 45 (2), pp. 370–380. doi:10.5054/tq.2011.254523
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes
Questions?
Thanks for listening!
Any questions?
natalie_eloise
Material licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0�
Rachel Hawkes