22CEC31 CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY
By
Dr. S. Vinodhkumar
AP/Civil/KEC
MIX-DESIGN
2
FACTORS IN THE CHOICE OF MIX DESIGN
Both IS: 456-2000 as well as IS: 1343 – 1980 envisages the concrete mix
design be based on the following factors:
Grade Designation
3
The characteristic strength requirement of the concrete is determined by the grade designation. Depending upon the level of quality control, the concrete is designed for a target mean strength, which is somewhat higher than the characteristic strength.
Type of Cement
Type of cement influences the rate of development of compressive strength of concrete and determines the durability under aggressive environment. The various types of cements that can be used with the approval of Engineer in Charge in concrete constructions are:
Workability
4
Workability is important for the satisfactory placement and compaction of concrete with respect to size and shape of the section, quantity and spacing of reinforcement and methods of compaction available at site.
Maximum Nominal Size of Aggregate
The maximum nominal size of aggregates to be used in concrete is governed by the size of the section and spacing of the reinforcement. Both IS : 456-2000 and IS : 1343- 1980 specify that the nominal maximum size of coarse aggregate
bars.
Minimum Cement Content
The maximum limit of cement content in the concrete has to be specified as concrete mixes with high cement content may give rise to shrinkage, cracking and creep of concrete also increases with cement paste content.
OUTLINE OF MIX DESIGN PROCEEDURE
5
and the conditions of use.
2 Target Strength For Mix Proportioning
In order that not more than the specified proportions of test results are not likely to fall below the Characteristic Strength, the Concrete Mix has to be proportioned for higher Target Mean Compressive Strength f’CK. The margin over Characteristic Strength is given by the following relation:
6
| f’CK = fCK + 1.65 S | |
Where f’CK | = | Target Mean Compressive Strength at 28 days in N/mm2 |
fCK | = | Characteristic Compressive Strength at 28 days in N/mm2 |
S | = | Standard Deviation as given in table 1 |
Standard Deviation
Where Sufficient test results for a particular grade of concrete are not available then the value of Standard Deviation given in Table 1 may be assumed for the proportioning of the mix.
Table 1 Assumed Standard Deviation
7
Note:- The above values corresponds to the site control having proper storage of cement; Weigh batching of all materials; Controlled addition of water; Regular checking of all materials -Aggregate grading and moisture content; Periodical checking of workability and strength. Where there is deviation from the above, values given in table shall be increased by 1 N/mm2
S. No | Grade of Concrete | Assumed Standard Deviation N/mm2 |
1 | M 10 M 15 | 3.5 |
2 | M 20 M 25 | 4.0 |
3 | M 30 M 35 M 40 M 45 M 50 M 55 | 5.0 |
3 Selection Of Mix Proportion
8
3.1 Selection of Water Cement Ratio
Concretes of Different Compressive Strength for the Same Water Cement Ratio
may be Produced with Different
preferably be established for the materials actually to be used.
for respective environmental exposure conditions may be used
NOTE: - The supplementary cementitious material, that is mineral admixtures shall also be considered in W/C Ratio calculations in accordance with Table 5 of IS 456 – 2000
3.2 Selection of Water Content
The Water content of concrete is influenced by a number of factors such as:
Water Demand is Reduced with
On the other hand Water Demand is Increased Due to Increase in
10
by Approximately
desired Water Content may be established
25 mm Slump
Table 2
Maximum Water Content per Cubic Metre of Concrete
for Nominal Maximum Size of Aggregate
S No. | Nominal maximum Size of Aggregate | Maximum Water Content |
| (mm) | (Kg) |
1 | 10 | 208 |
2 | 20 | 186 |
3 | 40 | 165 |
NOTE – These quantities of mixing water are for use in computing cementitious material contents for trial batches Water Content corresponding to Saturated Surface Dry Aggregate |
3.3 Calculation of Cementitious Material Content
Unit Volume Of Concrete may be calculated from
3.4 Estimation of Coarse Aggregate Proportions
Table 3
Volume of Coarse Aggregate per Unit Volume of Total
Aggregate for Different Zones of Fine Aggregate
S. No. | Nominal Maximum Size of Aggregate | Volume of Coarse Aggregate per unit Volume of Total Aggregate for Different Zones of Fine Aggregate | |||
| mm | Zone IV | Zone III | Zone II | Zone I |
i | 10 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.44 |
ii | 20 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.60 |
iii | 40 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
Volumes are based aggregates in saturated surface dry condition |
3.5 Combination of Different Coarse Aggregate Fractions
14
as to Result in an overall Grading Conforming to Table 2 of
IS 383 for particular Nominal Maximum Size of Aggregate
3.6 Estimation of Fine Aggregate Proportions
estimated except the Coarse and Fine Aggregate content.
their respective Specific gravities and then by 1000
AIMS OF MIX DESIGN
REASONABLE COST
FINISHABILITY
with AVAILABLE FACILITIES
METHODS OF CONCRETE MIX DESIGN
17
In all the above four methods, the W/C ratio is chosen for the target mean strength from empirical strength – w/c ratio relationships and water content is chosen for the required workability for aggregates in saturated surface (SSD) condition.
normal concrete mixes both for medium and high strength concrete.
maximum size of aggregate are first determined for reference values of
by the absolute volume method.
20
arrived at by exhaustive tests at the ‘Cement Research Institute of India
as well as on the basis of data generated in the country for the design of
concrete..
CONCRETE MIX-DESIGN TO IS : 10262 – 2019
21
(1)
STIPULATIONS for PROPORTIONING
a) Grade Designation | = | 30 Mpa |
b) Type of Cement | = | OPC 43 Grade conforming to IS 8112 |
c) Maximum Nominal Size of Aggregate | = | 20 mm (Angular) |
d) Minimum Cement Content | = | 320 Kg/m3 |
e) Maximum W/C Ratio | = | 0.45 |
f) Workability | = | 100 mm (Slump) |
g) Exposure Condition | = | Severe (For RCC Work) |
h) Degree of Supervision | = | Good |
| = = | Pumping 450 Kg/m3 |
k) Chemical Admixture Used
= Superplasticizer
22
Conforming to
2 TEST DATA FOR MATERIALS
OPC 43 Grade
IS 8112
3.15
Superplasticizer
conforming to
IS 9103 (If Required)
d) Specific Gravity of:
= 2.74
= 2.74
e) Water Absorption
= 0.5 Percent
= 1.0 Percent
f) Free (Surface) Moisture
= Nil
= Nil
Sieve Analysis
23
Coarse Aggregate
IS Sieve Size | Analysis of C.A. Fractions | Percentage of Different Fractions | |||
I | II | Combined | |||
(mm) | I | II | 60 % | 40 % | 100 % |
20 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 40 | 100 |
10 | 0 | 71.20 | 0 | 28.5 | 28.5 |
4.75 | - | 9.40 | - | 3.7 | 3.7 |
2.36 | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Remark: Conforming to Table 2 of IS : 383 – 1970 |
Fine Aggregate : Conforming to Grading zone II of Table IV of IS:383-1970
SOLUTION
24
3 TARGET MEAN STRENGTH
In order that not more than the specified proportion of test results are likely to fall below the CHARACTERISTIC STRENGTH, the concrete mix has to be designed at somewhat HIGHER TARGET AVERAGE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH σt
Target Mean strength is Given By
(1)
Where,
f’CK | = | Target Mean Compressive Strength at 28 days in N/mm2 |
fCK | = | Characteristic Compressive Strength at 28 days in N/mm2 |
S | = | Standard Deviation |
From Table 1 Standard Deviation , S = 5 N/mm2
Therefore
Target Strength = 30 + 1.65 x 5 = 38.25 N/mm2
NOTE: According to IS:456-1978 & 1343-1980 the Characteristic Strength is defined as that value below which not more than 5% (1 in 20) results are expected to fall.
f’CK = fCK + 1.65 S
4 SELECTION OF WATER-CEMENT RATIO
25
5 SELECTION OF WATER CONTENT
[ For 25 to 50 mm Slump
Range and 20 mm MSA]
Therefore
= 197 Litres
Note: Increase water by 3% for every additional 25 mm Slump
5 MINM. Cement Content, MAXM. W/C Ratio and Minm Grade of Concrete with different exposures with Normal Weight Aggregate of 20 mm Nominal Maxm Size[As per IS 456-2000]
26
TABLE :-
Exposure | Plain Concrete | Reinforced Concrete | ||||
Minimum Cement Content (Kg/m3) | Maximum Free W/C Ratio | Minimum Grade of Concrete | Minimum Cement Content (Kg/m3) | Maximum Free W/C Ratio | Minimum Grade of Concrete | |
Mild | 220 | 0.60 | - | 300 | 0.55 | M 20 |
Moderate | 240 | 0.60 | M 15 | 300 | 0.50 | M 25 |
Severe | 250 | 0.50 | M 20 | 320 | 0.45 | M 30 |
Very Severe | 260 | 0.45 | M 20 | 340 | 0.45 | M 35 |
Extreme | 280 | 0.40 | M 25 | 360 | 0.40 | M 40 |
Notes:
|
TABLE :- 6
27
Adjustments to Minimum Cement Contents for
Aggregates Other Than 20 mm Nominal maximum Size [As per IS 456-2000]
S. No. | Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size | Adjustments to Minimum Cement Contents in Table 5 |
1 | 10 | +40 |
2 | 20 | 0 |
3 | 40 | -30 |
6 CALCULATION OF CEMENT CONTENT
28
= 438 Kg/m3
Note: From Table 5 of IS 456 – 2000 Minimum Cement Content for Severe
Exposure Condition = 320 Kg/m3
438 Kg/m3 > 320 Kg/m3 Hence OK
7 PROPORTION OF VOLUME of COARSE AGGREGATE AND
FINE AGGREGATE CONTENT
From Table 3 For W/C Ratio = Volume of CA =
0.5 and Zone II of FA
0.62
Decrease in W/C Ratio = 0.5 – 0.45 = 0.05
Ratio Therefore,
Corrected Proportion of Coarse Aggregate
Proportion of Fine Aggregate = 1 – 0.63
CA = 0.63
FA = 0.37
8 MIX CALCULATION
=
= 0.139 m3
(c) Volume of Cement
30
=
= 0.197 m3
=
[a − (b + c + d)]
[1 − ( 0.139 + 0.197 + 0)]
0.664 m3
= e × Volume of CA × Specific
CA × 1000
0.664 × 0.63 × 2.74 × 1000
1146 Kg
= e × Volume of FA × Specific FA × 1000
=
=
Gravity of
=
=
=
=
0.664 × 0.37 × 2.74 × 1000
673 Kg
31
MIX PROPORTIONS FOR TRIAL No. 1
Water | Cement | FA | CA |
197 Litres | 438 Kg | 673 Kg | 1146 Kg (10 mm = 458 Kg) (20 mm = 688 Kg) |
0.45 | 1 | 1.54 | 2.62 |