Humanities and
Social Sciences
Communication
2. Communication Arts
(Digital Media)
Program | Number of Students | Total | |||
| Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |
English for Business Communication | 10 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 88 |
Communication Arts | 6 | 4 | 12 | 17 | 39 |
Total | 127 | ||||
Improvement plan
Degree Position | Professor | Asso. Professor | Asst. Professor | Lecturer | Total | ||||||||
| Ph. D | MA | BA | Ph. D | MA | BA | Ph. D | MA | BA | Ph. D | MA | BA | |
Full - time | | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | 4 | 5 | | 11 |
Part - time | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Improvement Plan
- Fix Me Make Me Right
- The Influence of Multimedia Based Pedagogy to
Empower Creativity in Communication Arts and
Digital Media Students
- Text book on culture
- Not definite title
2. Distribute both the faculty’s and students’ work extensively via social media
- The Faculty’s Facebook Fanpage
- CA Fanpage
- The College’s website
3. Retrieve opinions, needs and concerns directly from students for better skill development
- Questionnaires
◊ 5 Learning outcomes
◊ 3 Learner outcomes
◊ 21st-century skills
◊ Faculty’s curriculum and
teaching management
◊ Advisors
4. Plan for continuous learning environment improvement
Plan
Do
Check
Act
46 Projects Planned
Project Execution
Project Summary
Continuous Project Improvement
New Project Initiation
Component 1: Graduate Production
| Weaknesses
academic rank = 18.18 % ˃ 60 % |
Opportunities
| Threats
(requires solution) |
Solution
Program | Passed Evaluation Criteria | Fail Evaluation criteria | Evaluation Score | Evidence |
English for Business Communication | 1 | | 4.40 | 1.1.1 The result of evaluation on June 24, 2022 |
Communication Arts | 1 | | 4.49 | 1.1.2 The result of evaluation on June 24, 2022 |
The average score of both program 4.40 + 4.49 / 2 = 4. 45 | ||||
| | |||
1.1 Curriculum Management
Order | Name – Family Name | Doctoral Degree | Length of work Over 9 month |
1 | Assoc. Prof. Dr. Boonruang Chunsuvimol | Ph. D in Linguistics | √ |
2 | Asst. Prof. Dr. Boontiwa Kakhata | Ph. D in Political Management and Administrative Science | √ |
3 | Dr. Phillip Amos | Ph. D in Biblical Studies | √ |
4 | Dr. Mark Anthony | Ed. D Education Management | √ |
5 | Dr. Arellado Ma Arlen Forro | Ed. D in Psychology and Guidance | √ |
6 | Dr. Van Louis Lo | Ed. D in Educational Management and English Language Studies | √ |
| Total 6 | ||
| Percentage of faculty members with doctoral degree (6 x 100) / 11 = 54.55 | ||
| Converting percentage into score (54.55 x 5) / 40 = 6.81 | ||
Self-evaluation score = 5
1.2.1 Instructor Management
1.2.2 Full-Time Faculty members with an Academic Rank
Order |
Name – Family Name |
Educational Background | Length of Work | Number | ||
Less than 6 months | 6 – 9 months | More than 9 months | ||||
1 | Assoc. Prof. Dr. Boonruang Chunsuvimol | Ph. D in Linguistics |
|
| √ | 1 |
2 | Asst. Prof. Dr. Boontiwa Nakhata | Ph. D in Political and Administrative Science |
|
| √ | 1 |
| Total 2 | |||||
| Percentage of faculty member with an academic rank (2 x 100) / 11 = 18.18 | |||||
| Converting percentage into score (18.18 x 5) / 60 = 1.52 | |||||
1.2.3 Ratio of the number of full-time students to the number of full-time teachers
Program | SCH |
English for business communication | 2686 |
Communication Arts | 1202 |
Total | 3888 |
FTES = (2686 + 1202) ÷ 36
= 108 ÷ 11
Self – evaluation 9.82/1 ˃ 25/1 = 5
Overall Self-Evaluation for 1.2
1.2.1+1.2.2+1.2.3 (5 + 1.52 + 5) / 3 | Overall Score 3.84 |
1.3 Student Activities and Services
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Improvement Plan
Learning Outcomes
Learner Outcomes
21st century skills
Self-Evaluation
Stake-holder Evaluation
Graduate Qualification Evaluation
English Competence (BE)
2020
2021
First year
Second year
Third year
Fourth year
English Competence (CA)
2020
2021
First year
Second year
Third year
Fourth year
TOEIC Score BE
2020
2021
First year
Second year
Third year
Fourth year
TOEIC Score CA
2020
2021
First year
Second year
Third year
Fourth year
Learning Outcomes: BE (4)
2020
2021
Moral and Ethics
Knowledge
Cognition
Interpersonal Skills
Numerical communication, technology skills
Learning Outcomes: CA (4)
2020
2021
Moral and Ethics
Knowledge
Cognition
Interpersonal Skills
Numerical communication, technology skills
Learner Outcomes BE (4)
2020
2021
Learner person
Co-creator
Active citizen
Learner Outcomes CA (4)
2020
2021
Learner person
Co-creator
Active citizen
Goal | Performance | Self – Evaluation score |
6 items | 6 items | 5 points |
Self – Evaluation
1.3 Student Activities and Services
1.4 Student Development Plans and Outcomes
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Improvement Plan
2020 | 2021 |
= 156
131 x 100 156 = 83.97 ˃ 60.00 |
= 127
402 × 100 = 316.54 ˃ 60% 127 |
1.4.1 Total number of students = 127 Total number of participating students 402 | (402 ÷ 127) × 100 = 316.54 (316.54 ÷ 60) × 5 = 26.38 | 5 |
1.4.2 Total number of forth-year students = 44 Number of fourth-year students passing TOEIC Benchmark score = 11 | (100 x11) ÷ 44 = 25 % (25 ÷ 60) × 5 = 2.08 | 2.08 |
1.4.2 Number of students joined 21st century skills evaluation = 127 (88+39) | (100 x 127) /127 = 100%
| 5 |
|
|
|
Evaluation
Performance Result | KPI 1.4.1 | KPI 1.4.2 |
Score | 5 = (5 x 316.54) / 60 = 5 | (2.08 + 5) /2= 3.54 |
Total score for 1.4 | (5 + 3.54) / 2 = 4.27
| |
Self - Evaluation
Component 2: Research and Innovation
2.1 Research and Innovation Management (Creative work)
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
rank requesting
Threats
Improvement plan
Goal | Performance | Self-evaluation |
7 items | 7Items | 5 points |
Self – Assessment
2.2 Research and Innovation (Creative work)Fund Management
| |
| |
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Improvement plan
Goal | Performance | Score |
The amount of grant per head is 25,000 upwards | The amount of grand per head is 25,000 250,000 × 5 25,000 | 5 |
Self – Evaluation
2.3 Research and Innovation (Creative work) Output Management
| Weaknesses
|
| |
Strengths
Opportunities
Threats
Improvement plan
Goal | Performance | Achievement |
20% of total instructors with research / academic work | Instructors with research work accounted for 36.37 % | 5 |
Evaluation
�
Number of published research paper x 100 4 x 100 = 36.37 %
Number of full-time instructors 11
Curriculum and Teaching Management Satisfaction (BE)
2020
2021
Curricular
Instructor
Learning Environment
Teaching and Learning Management
Evaluation
Students’ Attribution Development
Weakness 2021<2020
Curriculum and Teaching Management Satisfaction (CA)
2020
2021
Curricular
Instructor
Learning Environment
Teaching and Learning Management
Evaluation
Students’ Attribution Development
Component 3: Academic Service to Society
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Target Goal | Performance | Self – Assessment score | Achievement |
6 items performed | 6 items performed | 5 | √ |
Self – Evaluation
Component 4: Arts and Culture and Thainess
Strengths
Weaknesses
“Thai Puan Songkran Festival”/ “Loy Kratong”
Opportunities
they wanted to visit
into words
Threats
Improvement Plant
Self – Evaluation
Target Goal | Performance | Score | Achievement |
5 | 5 | 5 | √ |
Component 5: Administration and Management
Quality Standard 5.1: Organization Management
Strengths
MIS (TQF 3,4,5,6/ store and retrieve students’ data etc.)
Google classroom (on-line teaching)
Kahoot and Secrative application (for quizzes)
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Improvement Plan
Risk issues
* Students drop out between semester
* Students’ TOEIC scores below the benchmark score
Benchmark
First year 400
Second year 500
Third year 550
Fourth year 600
1st Risk: TOEIC Average Score
2019 2020 2021
BE 1 371.52 460.33 661.00
BE 2 308.52 395.95 555.92
BE 3 325.12 413.60 535.14
BE 4 342.00 497.73 459.40
CA 1 314.61 257.63 577.00
CA 2 301.48 327.22 455.63
CA 3 270.36 306.69 454.66
CA 4 345.00 277.86 353.13
2nd Risk: Students’ resignation
2019 2020 2021
Percentage 32.95 32.18 3.76
Target Goal | Performance | Score |
7 items performed | 7 items performed | 5 |
Self - Evaluation
Quality Standard 5.2: Educational Quality Management
Strengths
BE CA
2020 4.35 4.35
2021 4.40 4.49
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Improvement Plan
การนำมาตรฐานอุดมศึกษาสู่การปฎิบัติ: BE
2020
2021
การนำมาตรฐานอุดมศึกษาสู่การปฎิบัติ: CA
2020
2021
Best Practice