tt
LAW FOR CREATIVES AND WEEBS AND CREATIVE WEEBS
Kumori-Con 2025
…a maullarmaullar panel
This presentation, and these slides, are subject to a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-SA license.
Nothing in this panel is legal advice, nor does this panel create an attorney-client relationship.
Disclaimer Time
About The Presenter
What will you learn in this panel?
Copyright
The DAICON IV opening animation (1983) may contain the most copyright violations of any 6-minute video in history!
Copyright—What Is It?
Exclusive right to do the following (17 U.S.C. 106):
TIP:
Copyright does not include the right to be attributed.
Plagiarism, while unethical, is not copyright infringement (although the copying itself might be.)
Sourcing is not a defense to copyright infringement!
Copyright—How To Get One?
Requirements for copyright (17 U.S.C. 102):
TIP:
More than one copyright may apply to a work. For example, the composition of a song, the lyrics of the song, a recording of the song, and a music video of the song are all separately copyrightable.
Keep this in mind when getting permissions!
Copyright—How To Get One
Copyright—Enforcement
Copyright—Fair Use
4-factor balancing test:
No one factor is determinative. Fair use is HIGHLY fact-dependent, so consult with a lawyer!
Copyright—Fair Use
Purpose & character: Parody seeks to comment on or critique earlier work, which is transformative and a “social benefit.” [5]
Market harm: Parody doesn’t substitute for original work. Although criticism could harm demand for the original, this “does not produce a harm cognizable under the Copyright Act.” [5]
HOLDING: Fair use. [6]
Copyright—Fair Use
Purpose & character: Google Image Search “transforms” pictures into thumbnails (identifiers for websites.) New work, socially beneficial. [7] Transformative.
Market harm: Thumbnails don’t substitute for full-size images. [7]
HOLDING: Fair use.
Copyright—Fair Use
Copyright—Works for Hire
When paying for a work to be created, copyright generally does not transfer to the payor UNLESS:
Shirobako’s Yasuhara Ema is an employee of Musashino Animation, meaning any copyrightable subject matter she produces as part of her work presumptively belongs to Musashino.
Copyright – Licensing
Per its licensing agreement with Tatsunoko, Harmony Gold has rights to use the Macross IP everywhere except Japan.
Copyright—Licensing
Copyright—Public Domain
Mickey Mouse (Steamboat Willie), who entered the public domain in 2024.
Copyright—Abandonment
Copyright—What About AI?
Copyright – Quiz
Contracts
Contracts—Formation
TIP:
Contracts do not necessarily need to be in writing, unless the Statute of Frauds applies (e.g. the contract is intended to run longer than 1 year.)
Oral contracts do tend to be harder to prove for obvious reasons.
Contracts—Terms Not In Contract
Contracts—Scope of Work
Contracts—Payment
Contracts—Timing
Contracts—Disputes
Contracts—NDAs and noncompetes
Contracts—Quiz
When do I need a lawyer?
OK, so I need a lawyer…
OK, so I need a lawyer…
How much will this cost?
OK, so I need a lawyer…
Wait! Can’t I just use AI?
Q&A Time
REMEMBER, THIS PANEL IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE.
PLEASE KEEP YOUR QUESTIONS GENERAL.
GOOD QUESTION: “What is a LLC and why do people have them?”
BAD QUESTION: “My parents are kicking me out of their basement because I torrented too much anime and got the Internet canceled. Is this a First Amendment violation?”
Credits & Sources
Assets: sozaino.site Artwork: Myself (@maullarmaullar on most social media)
References/Notes:
[1] Feist Pubs., Inc. v. Rural Tel. Svc. Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)
[2] Naruto v. Slater, No. 16-15469 (9th Cir. 2018)
[3] U.S. Copyright Office Review Board, Decision Affirming Refusal of Registration of a Recent Entrance to Paradise (Feb. 14, 2022)
[4] Sony BMG v. Tenenbaum, 660 F.3d 487 (1st Cir. 2011)
[5] Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 579 (1994)
[6] “Verdict: Fair Use” would sound better here, but is not accurate. A ‘verdict’ is a decision reached by a jury. Appellate courts, like the Supreme Court, make ‘holdings’ of law.
[7] Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007)
[8] Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. RDR Books, 575 F.Supp.2d 513 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)
[9] Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730 (1989)
[10] Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate, 755 F.3d 496 (7th Cir. 2014)
[11] Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 U.S. 663 (2014)
[12] Schatt v. Curtis Mgmt. Grp., Inc., 764 F.Supp. 902 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)
[13] Bartz et al. v. Anthropic PBC, No. C 24-05417 WHA (N.D. Cal. 2025)
[14] Concord Music Grp., Inc. v. Anthropic PBC, No. 24-cv-03811-EKL (N.D. Cal. 2025)
[15] Berman v. Freedom Fin. Network, 30 F.4th 849 (9th Cir. 2022).
[16] Comb v. Paypal, Inc., 218 F.Supp.2d 1165 (N.D. Cal. 2002)
[17] Cal. Business and Professions Code 16600.5
[18] Code of Hammurabi
Follow me on Twitter
for art, musings, etc
…but mostly
bad posts