Expert Session
on
Effect of Earthquake on Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
1
Prepared by:
Dr. Kamalsinh M. Padhiar
Head & Associate Professor
Civil Engineering Department,
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Outline of Presentations
2
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Different layer of earth
3
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
4
Volcano
Landslides
Tsunami
Hurricane
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Earthquake Zones in India
5
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Effects of Earthquake
Ground break, Fault formation
Failure of R. C.Structures
Failure of railway, highway & bridges
Landslides and slope failure
Liquefaction and Foundation Failure
Failure of retaining walls
Tsunami
6
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Major Tectonic Plates on Earth’s surface
7
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Causes of Earthquake
8
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Types of Seismic Waves
9
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Measuring Instrument-Seismograph
10
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Difference between Magnitude and Intensity
11
Magnitude | Intensity |
Magnitude is the quantitative measure of the actual size of the earthquake. | Intensity is an indicator of the severity of shaking generated at a given location. |
Measured by Richter Scale | Measured by Mercalli Scale |
Magnitude provides more objectivity. | Intensity is more subjective in nature. |
Magnitude is not depend on the Distance. | Intensity is depend on the Distance. Intensity is more near the epicentre. |
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Difference between Magnitude and Intensity
12
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Global Occurrence of Earthquake
13
Group | Magnitude | Annual Average Number |
Great | Greater Than 8 | 1 |
Major | 7-7.9 | 18 |
Strong | 6-6.9 | 120 |
Moderate | 5-5.9 | 800 |
Light | 4-4.9 | 6200 |
Minor | 3-3.9 | 49,000 |
Very Minor | Less than 3 | M 2-3: 1000/day M 1-2: 8000/day |
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
14
Geography and Tectonic Features
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Major Earthquake in India
15
Date | Location | Magnitude | Maximum Intensity | Death |
16 June 1819 | Cutch | 8.3 | VIII | 1500 |
12 June 1897 | Assam | 8.7 | XII | 1500 |
8 Feb. 1900 | Coimbatore | 6.0 | X | Nil |
4 Apr. 1905 | Kangra | 8.6 | X | 19000 |
15 Jan. 1934 | Bihar- Nepal | 8.4 | X | 11000 |
31 May 1935 | Quetta | 7.6 | X | 30000 |
15 Aug. 1950 | Assam | 8.5 | X | 1530 |
21 Jul. 1956 | Anjar | 7.0 | IX | 115 |
10 Dec. 1967 | Koyna | 6.5 | VIII | 200 |
23 Mar. 1970 | Bharuch | 5.4 | VII | 30 |
21 Aug. 1988 | Bihar- Nepal | 6.6 | IX | 1004 |
20 Oct. 1991 | Uttarkashi | 6.6 | IX | 768 |
30 Sep. 1993 | Killari (Latur) | 6.4 | IX | 7928 |
22 May 1997 | Jabalpur | 6.0 | VIII | 38 |
29 Mar 1999 | Chamoli | 6.6 | VIII | 63 |
26 Jan. 2001 | Bhuj | 7.7 | X | 13805 |
26 Dec. 2004 | Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala | 9.3 | X | 16389 |
8 oct. 2005 | Kashmir | 7.6 | X | 1309 |
18 Sept. 2011 | Gangtok, Sikkim | 6.9 | VIII | 7860 |
25 April 2015 | Nepal, Bihar, UP, Delhi | 7.9 | X | 79 |
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Failures after Earthquake
16
Railway track after the Earthquake
Failure of Express Highway in Kobe
Navalakki Port, Bhuj 2001
Ahmedabad, Bhuj 2001
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Seismic Effects on different Structures
17
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
18
Seismic Effects on Structures
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Flow of Intertia force to foundation
19
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Effect of Architectural Features of building during Earthquake
20
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
21
Effect of Architectural Features of building during Earthquake
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
How building twist during an Earthquake?
22
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Earthquake Resistant Building
23
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Earthquake Design Building Philosophy
24
1
2
3
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Damage in Building
25
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Acceptable Damage: Ductility
26
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
How to make Building Ductile for Good Seismic Performance
27
Capacity Design Concept
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Strong Column Weak Beam Theory
28
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Oscillation of Building
29
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Indian Seismic Code List
30
IS 1893(Part I),2002: Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake resistant Design of Structure
IS 4326, 1993: Indian Standard Code of Practice for Earthquake Resistant Design and construction of Buildings
IS 13827, 1993: Indian Standard Guidelines for Improving Earthquake Resistance of Earthen buildings
IS 13828, 1993: Indian Standard guideline for Improving Earthquake resistance of Low Strength Masonry Buildings
IS 13920, 1993: Indian Standard Code of Practice for Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to Seismic Forces
IS 13935, 1993: Indian Standard Guidelines for Repair and Seismic Strengthening of Buildings
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Role of Bands in Building Construction
1) Horizontal Bands
2) Gable Bands
3) Lintel Bands
4) Plinth Bands
31
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Building with no Horizontal Band Collapse in Earthquake
32
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Building with Bands
33
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Vertical Reinforcement in Masonry Building
34
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Vertical Reinforcement in Building
35
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
How earthquake Affect Reinforced Concrete Structures
36
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Reinforcement and Design Strategy in Beams
37
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Reinforcement and Design Strategy in Beams
38
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Reinforcement and Design Strategy in Columns
39
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Reinforcement and Design Strategy in Columns
40
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Reinforcement and Design Strategy in Beam Column Joint
41
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Reinforcement and Design Strategy in Beam Column Joint
42
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Shear Wall Building
43
Advantages of Shear Wall:
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Architectural aspects of Shear Wall
44
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Ways to Reduce the Effects of Earthquake in Buildings – Base Isolation
45
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
Ways to Reduce the Effects of Earthquake in Buildings – Seismic Dampers
46
R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli
47