The proposal is supported for its potential to bolster Rari DAO's treasury and enhance sustainability, offering stability in prices and potential for income generation.�
Concerns raised include a preference for on-chain investments and potential contradiction to DeFi principles by investing off-chain.
10 of 10
Community discussion
Questions, ideas, thoughts
Coffeecrusher
Transparency report Q: confirming the pie chart on slide 6 is general contractor fees/payroll to RF consultants?
A: Yes, everyone at the foundation is a consultant rather than a W2 employee.
Proposal fee switch Q: Clarifying the fee is for every transaction on the protocol? Is the fee in RARI or ETH?
A: Yes, this is taking the existing fee (mostly in ETH and some other tokens depending on the currency of the listing. There is no conversion on time of purchase) and redirecting to the DAO, not implementing a new fee, so the user won't feel a difference. Rarible will get 0.5% now and DAO gets their share.
Q: Where does the fee go?
A: Into the DAO treasury, not a specified line item or multisig, but this can be voted on later if the DAO wants to separate the fees from the main treasury.
Jengajojo
Transparency report Q: Can the Foundation share a Planned vs Realized budget with the community?
A: Start with reviewing the yearly budget proposal compared to Q1 transparency report
Feedback: The Foundation should post Transparency Report details on forum prior to community calls so the delegates can review and come prepared with questions on calls
A: Foundation will post the Transparency Report on forum and address questions in a future community call