https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
1
10-04-2023
Dr. A. Ramkishan
M.Pharm, Ph.D (Pharmacology), FIPS, FTAS, FIPA, FAPAS
Deputy Drugs Controller (India)
Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), Hyderabad
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India
WHO Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) for Evaluation of National Regulatory System of Biological Products (Human Vaccines)
Function 2 - Registration and Marketing Authorization (MA): Indicators and Fact Sheets
NRA Assessment
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
2
10-04-2023
NRA Assessment
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
3
10-04-2023
NRA Assessment Tool
�“WHO has developed an ‘Assessment Tool’ (a set of questionnaire called as indicators and sub-indicators along with guidance for assessor) since 1999 to assess the various functions and performances of the NRA, revised the tool many times and currently revised in 2015.”
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
4
10-04-2023
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
5
10-04-2023
NRA Assessment - 2008
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
6
10-04-2023
NRA Assessment - 2012
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
7
10-04-2023
NRA Assessment - 2012
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
8
10-04-2023
NRA Assessment
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
9
10-04-2023
NRA Assessment - 2017
NRA – WHO Assessors
WHO NRA Assessment team includes a wide array of assessors who are highly experienced and experts in their fields. This time CDSCO shall be assessed by 16 assessors from different parts of world (Switzerland, USA, Italy, Germany, Netherlands, Thailand, Egypt, Indonesia, India and SEARO (WHO))
List of assessors are as follows:
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
10
10-04-2023
Name of Assessor | Designation and Country | Area of Assessment |
Dr. Mike Ward | RSS Coordinator, WHO (HQ) Geneva, Switzerland. | National Regulatory System (NRS) |
Dr. Alireza Khadem | CRS Group Lead, Scientist, WHO (HQ) Geneva, Switzerland | National Regulatory System (NRS) |
Dr. Gopa Raychaudhuri | Senior Scientist, Washington, USFDA, USA | National Regulatory System (NRS) |
Dr. Robin Levis | Deputy Director, Division of viral products, CBER, US FDA, USA | Registration and Marketing Authorization (MA) |
NRA – WHO Assessors
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
11
10-04-2023
Name of Assessor | Designation and Country | Area of Assessment |
Ms. Valeria Gigante | Scientific officer, Innovation and Pharmaceutical Strategy Department, Rome, Italy | Registration and Marketing Authorization (MA) |
Dr. Brigitte Keller- Stanislawski | Head of Unit, Safety of Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, Germany | Vigilance (VL) |
Dr. Miriam Sturkenboom | Dep. Medical Informatics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands | Vigilance (VL) |
Dr. Madhur Gupta | Technical Officer, New Delhi | Vigilance (VL) |
Dr. Leonard Machado | AEFI Focal Person New Delhi | Vigilance (VL) |
Ms. Razieh Ostad Ali Dehaghi | Technical officer, Geneva, Switzerland | Market Surveillance and Control (MC) |
Dr. Dianliang Lei | Scientist, Geneva, Switzerland | Laboratory Access and Testing (LA) |
NRA – WHO Assessors
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
12
10-04-2023
Name of Assessor | Designation and Country | Area of Assessment |
Ms. Teeranart Jivapaisarnpong | Medical Scientist, Advisory Level, Department of Medical Science, Bangkok, Thailand | Laboratory Access and Testing (LA) and NRA Lot Release (LR) |
Dr. (Ms) Anna-Laura Salvati | Office for evaluation of Biological and Medicinal Products, Rome, Italy | Regulatory inspection and Licensing Premises (LI) |
Ms. Achiraya Praisuwan | Senior inspector, Bangkok, Thailand | Regulatory inspection and Licensing Premises (LI) |
Ms. Juliati Dahlan | Head of Section of Biological Products Evaluation, Jakarta, Indonesia | Clinical Trials Oversight (CT) |
Mr. Samir El-Hemsy | Technical Officer, Cairo, Egypt | IT support to the team |
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
13
10-04-2023
NRA Assessment – Process & Procedure
NRA – Maturity Levels
WHO – Global Benchmarking Tool has defined Maturity levels based on the functionality of NRA of respective country
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
14
10-04-2023
Maturity Level | Definition |
1 | No systematic approach evident, no results, poor results or unpredictable results. The main theme is some elements of regulatory system exist |
2 | Problem or corrective-based systematic approach; minimum data on improvement results available. The main theme is reactive and/or responsive regulatory systems exist |
3 | Systematic process based approach, early stage of systematic improvements, data available on conformance to objectives and existence of improvement trends. The main theme is systematic regulatory approach and functions with the essentials capacity are implemented. |
4 | Improvement process in use; good results and sustained improvement trends. The main theme is proactive well resourced regulatory system with continually improving functions are implemented |
5 | Strongly integrated improvement process, best in class benchmarked results demonstrated. The main theme is fully integrated, initiative taking and autonomous regulatory system is implemented |
Results of NRA assessment in 2017
Status of Regulatory Functions
NRA Function assessed | Sub Indicators MET/Expected to be MET | Indicators MET/Expected to be MET | Sub Indicators % MET | Status of the functions assessed | Maturity level |
01-NATIONAL REGULATORY SYSTEM (NRS) | 58.5 out of 61 | 10 out of 10 | 96 | Implemented | 3 |
02-REGISTRATION AND MARKETING AUTHORIZATION (RMA) | 31 out of 31 | 6 out of 6 | 100 | Implemented | 4 |
03-VIGILANCE (PVL) | 25 out of 25 | 6 out of 6 | 100 | Implemented | 4 |
04-MARKET SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL (MSC) | 21 out of 24 | 5 out of 6 | 88 | Implemented | 3 |
05-LICENSING PREMISES (LIC) | 18 out of 20 | 5 out of 6 | 90 | Implemented | 3 |
06-REGULATORY INSPECTION (RI) | 24 out of 26 | 6 out of 6 | 92 | Implemented | 3 |
07-LABORATORY ACCESS AND TESTING (LAT) | 34 out of 34 | 10 out of 10 | 100 | Implemented | 4 |
08-CLINICAL TRIAL’S OVERSIGHT (CTO) | 31 out of 31 | 6 out of 6 | 100 | Implemented | 4 |
09-NRA LOT RELEASE (LTR) | 22 out of 22 | 6 out of 6 | 100 | Implemented | 4 |
Strength of NRA
National Vaccine Policy, CDSCO IDP, Road map for strengthening of India regulatory land scape, Quality Risk Management and the development of the regulatory system as part of twelfth, five years development plan
Results of NRA assessment in 2017
Results of NRA assessment in 2017
Results of NRA assessment in 2017
Recommendations of NRA assessment in 2017
Recommendations of NRA assessment in 2017
Introduction to the tools
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
21
10-04-2023
NRA Assessment Tool
�The revised assessment tool has been renamed as Global Benchmarking Tool) and include following functions [9 Functions, 63 Indicators and 288 Sub Indicators (150 Critical)] as per the GBT 2016
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
22
10-04-2023
New Feature of WHO Global Benchmarking Tool
NRA Assessment: 2024 - Indicator categories by regulatory function
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
24
10-04-2023
WHO Global Assessment Tool 2015�Computer Based User Friendly Assessment Tool
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
25
10-04-2023
WHO Global Assessment Tool Mar 2016�Indicators Categorization (cross cutting subjects)
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
26
10-04-2023
�SYSTEM �FUNCTION
INDICATORS
SUB-INDICATORS
GUIDANCE FOR ASSESSMENT�Assessment Criteria + Standrad References + Evidences For Review
%
Function 2:���Registration and Marketing Authorization (RMA)�(
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
27
10-04-2023
Introduction
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
28
10-04-2023
S.No. | Particulars | 2016 -2017 | 2012 |
1 | No. of Indicators | 6 | 9 |
2 | No. of sub-indicators | 33 | 25 |
3 | No. of critical Sub-Indicators based on the Maturity Level 1 = 6, 2 =2, 3= 23, 4 =4 (Total 35) | 15 | 21 |
2018 -2021 |
06 |
35 |
|
Overview of Registration and Marketing Authorization (RMA)
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
29
10-04-2023
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
30
10-04-2023
Overview of Registration and Marketing Authorization (RMA)
Indicator: MA01 :Legal provisions, regulations and guidelines required to define regulatory framework of registration and/or marketing authorization
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
31
10-04-2023
Indicator: MA01 :Legal provisions, regulations and guidelines required to define regulatory framework of registration and/or marketing authorization
viii. MA01.08: Legal provisions or regulations allow the NRA to recognize and/or rely on MA-relevant decisions, reports or information from other NRAs or regional and international bodies.
ix: MA01.09: Specific guidelines on the quality, nonclinical and clinical aspects are established and implemented.
x: MA01.10: There are guidelines on the format and content for submission of MA applications that are consistent with the WHO or other internationally accepted standards
xi: MA01.11: There are guidelines for MA holders that define the types and scope of variations, the format and content to be used for documenting the variations, and the identification of those variations that require prior approval or notification
xii: MA01.12: There are established guidelines that cover circumstances under which the routine MA procedures may not be followed (e.g., for public- health interest).
xiii: MA01.13: There are guidelines on the content of product information leaflets, SPC-like information, and product packaging and labelling.
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
32
10-04-2023
Indicator: MA02 :Arrangement for effective organization and good governance
Sub-indicators:
Indicator: MA03 Human resources to perform registration and marketing authorization activities
Sub-indicators:
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
33
10-04-2023
Indicator: MA04 Procedures established and implemented to perform registration and/or marketing authorization.
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
34
10-04-2023
Sub-indicators:
vii: MA04.07: There are documented mechanisms to handle non-routine registration or MA requirements in special situations (e.g., public-health interest).
viii: MA04.08: SPC-like, labelling and packaging information are approved by the NRA as part of the MA procedure.
ix: MA04.09: GMP inspection report and/or certification is considered as part of the MA process.
x:MA04.10: The regulations and guidelines for good review practices (GRevPs) are developed or recognized and implemented
Indicator: MA05 Mechanism exists to promote transparency, accountability and communication.
Sub-indicators:
MA05.01: Web site or other official publication with SPC-like information is available and regularly updated.
MA05.02: Updated list of all medical products granted MA is regularly published and publicly available
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
35
10-04-2023
Indicator: MA04 Procedures established and implemented to perform registration and/or marketing authorization.
�����
iii. MA05.03: A summary technical evaluation report for approved registration MA applications is published and available to the public
iv. MA05.04: A summary technical evaluation report for deferred or rejected registration or MA applications is published and available to the public
Indicator: MA06 Mechanism in place to monitor regulatory performance and output.
MA06.01: There is a database of all product applications received, approved, rejected, suspended or withdrawn along with their supporting documentation.
MA06.02: Performance indicators for registration and MA activities are established and implemented.
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
36
10-04-2023
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
37
10-04-2023
New Drugs and CT Rules 2019
The Indian Vaccine Industry……
How Vaccine differ from drugs
CHAPTERS under NDCTR 2019
I - Preliminary
II - Authorities & Officers
III - EC for CT, BA / BE study
IV - EC for Biomedical & Health Research
V - CT, BA / BE study of ND & Inv. ND
VI - Compensation
VII - BA & BE study centre
VIII - Mfg of ND or Inv. ND for CT, BA/BE or R&D
IX - Import of ND or Inv. ND for CT, BA/BE or R&D
X - Import of ND for Sale or distribution
XI - Import or Mfg of unapproved ND for treatment of patients in
Govt. hospitals & institutions
XII - Amendments of D&C Rules, 1945
XIII - Miscellaneous
SCHEDULES under NDCTR 2019
I. A drug, including active pharmaceutical ingredient or phytopharmaceutical drug, which has not been used in the country to any significant extent, except in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the rules made thereunder, as per conditions specified in the labeling thereof and has not been approved as safe and efficacious by the Central Licensing Authority with respect to its claims; or
II. A drug approved by the Central Licensing Authority for certain claims and proposed to be marketed with modified or new claims including indication, route of administration, dosage and dosage form; or
III. a fixed dose combination of two or more drugs, approved separately for certain claims and proposed to be combined for the first time in a fixed ratio, or where the ratio of ingredients in an approved combination is proposed to be changed with certain claims including indication, route of administration, dosage and dosage form; or
IV. a modified or sustained release form of a drug or novel drug delivery system of any drug approved by the Central Licensing Authority; or
V. A vaccine, recombinant Deoxyribonucleic Acid (r-DNA) derived product, living modified organism, monoclonal anti-body, stem cell derived product, gene therapeutic product or xenografts, intended to be used as drug;
Definition of New Drugs (as per New Drugs and CT Rules 2019)
Vaccine Approval Procedure
Provision for pre-submission meeting
�
�
Fee Structure (6th Schedule of NDCTR 2019)
For reconsideration of application – Rs 50,000.
For reconsideration of application - Rs. 2000 per product
Post Approval Changes -As per Guidance for Industry
Fees & forms for Market Authorization
Subject | (INR) | Forms |
Import/manufacture new drug (Finished Formulation/API) | 5,00,000 | Import:CT-18 / CT-19 (API) Manufacture: CT-21/CT-22 (API) |
Import/manufacture new Drug (Finished Formulation/API/ FDC) already approved in the country | 2,00,000 | Import:CT-18 /CT-19 (API) Manufacture: CT-21/CT-22 (API) |
Import/manufacture approved new drug/FDC for new claims/indication/dosage form/route of administration/ strength. | 3,00,000 | Import: CT-18 Manufacture: CT-21 |
Import/manufacture FDC having one or more of the ingredients as unapproved new molecules | 5,00,000 | Import:CT-18 Manufacture: CT-21 |
Reference: NDCT Rules 2019 GSR 227 (E), Sixth Schedule
Fees & Forms for Market Authorization
Subject | (INR) | Forms |
Import FDC having approved ingredients for marketing | 4,00,000 | CT-18 |
Manufacture FDC having approved ingredients for sale or distribution | 3,00,000 | CT-21 |
Manufacture FDC already approved for sale or distribution | 2,00,000 | CT-21 |
Manufacture FDC for new claims/ indication/ dosage form/ route of administration/ strength | 3,00,000 | CT-21 |
Reference: NDCT Rules 2019 GSR 227 (E), Sixth Schedule
RMA Auditors�(Dr.Valeria Gigante, Team Lead, AMR, WHO Geneva then FDA Auditor from Italy)�Dr.Robin Lewis, USFDA
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
52
10-04-2023
WHO-NRA Assessment 2017 Team
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
53
10-04-2023
Changes from GBT 2017 to GBT 2022 in RMA
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
54
10-04-2023
Function : RMA | GBT 2017 | GBT 2022 | Remark |
Indicators | 06 | 06 | Same |
Sub- Indicators | 32 | 35 | 03 Sub indicators additional |
Sub Indicators with ML 4 | 05 | 04 | 01 sub indicator less |
Sub Indicators with ML 3 | 19 | 23 | 05 sub indicators additional |
Changes from GBT 2017 to GBT 2022 in RMA
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
55
10-04-2023
Function : RMA | GBT 2017 | GBT 2022 | Remark |
New sub indicator added | -- | MA01.07: There are legal provisions or regulations that define regulatory requirements to approve donation of medical products. (ML1) | The assessor should verify that legal provisions or regulations, which define the circumstances under which medical products can be received through donation, exist and are implemented. The legal provisions should provide guidance regarding required information and documentation that should be reviewed before approval of donated medical products. The provisions should also provide guidance on the scope of evaluation as well as the documentation required to show quality, safety and efficacy of donated medical products. |
Changes from GBT 2017 to GBT 2022 in RMA
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
56
10-04-2023
Function : RMA | GBT 2017 | GBT 2022 | Remark |
| --- | MA05.04: A summary technical evaluation report for deferred or rejected registration or MA applications is published and available to the public. (ML4) | The assessor should verify that the summary technical evaluation reports of those medical products registration applications that have been deferred or rejected is published and made available to the public, and these actions are supported by a regulation or guideline. The content and format of the report should be guided by an SOP to ensure uniformity. Procedures should be in place to monitor the generation of the reports to ensure that the content and format conforms to the approved |
�Additional information sought in Sub indicators�
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
57
10-04-2023
Sub indicator | Description |
MA01.06: There are legal provisions to cover circumstances under which the routine MA procedures may not be followed (e.g., for public health interest).(ML1) | The legal provisions also should provide guidance on the scopeof evaluation and on the documentation required in the event that the non- routineapproach is used for registration or MA.In addition, if the conditional authorization is time limited, the assessor should verify that the duration of validity is defined in thisregulation. |
MA04.01:Documented procedures and tools are implemented for the assessment of the different parts of the application (i.e., quality, and efficacy) and for the assessment of specific requirements applicable to specific classes of medical products.(ML3) | The assessor should note that there may be other registration or MA routes in special cases, e.g., for prequalified products or during emergencies when the normal procedures and tools may not apply. |
MA01.12: There are established guidelines that cover circumstances under whichthe routine MA procedures may not be followed (e.g., for public- health interest).(ML3) | Guidelines that provide guidance to the NRA on the application of a non-routine MA procedure in emergency situations, as well as the corresponding SOPs or supporting documents. |
�Institutional Development Plan (IDP) for MA, 2017:�
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
58
10-04-2023
S. no. | Sub-activity | IDP |
1 | MA01.02: There are legal provisions to hold, suspend, and /or withdraw or cancel an MA in there is/are finding (s) on quality, safety or efficacy issues. | Others, The NSQ SMS could be further developed as a tool to inform health care providers of any safety issue. |
2 | MA01.05: There are regulations and /or guidelines for the definition, types and the scopes of variations along with the required documentation | Others, considering the upcoming use of electronic submissions of MA applications and the substantial investment in the e-governance system, the SUGAM system could be used for the submission and review of post-marketing variations. |
3 | | Other, Guidelines and SOP to be developed to cover circumstances in which the routine MA may not be followed. |
4 | MA03.03: Training plan developed, implemented and updated at least once a year. | Country training; Enhance training opportunities for new staff members on vaccine product specific review activities. |
�Institutional Development Plan (IDP) for MA, 2017:�
https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools/VI
59
10-04-2023
S. no. | Sub-activity | IDP |
5 | MA04.01: Documented procedures/tools are implemented for the assessment of the different parts of the application and for the assessment of specific requirements of specific classes of medical products (quality, safety and efficacy) | Other; SOP BIV-P-16 needs to be improved. |
6 | MA04.03: Documented procedures are implemented for assessing the applications for variations of MAs. | Others; Ensure that guidance document related to post approval changes is current. |
7 | MA04.05: An advisory/scientific committee, including external members, is involved in the review of MA applications as necessary. | Others; Expert committee meeting minutes need to be expanded to include details of the product specific discussions that support the final committee decision whether positive or negative regarding the conduction of clinical trials. |
Initiatives taken up by CDSCO in COVID -19 Pandemic towards approval of Vaccines
List of covid-19 Vaccines approved till date
Draft regulatory guidelines for development of vaccines with special consideration for covid-19 vaccine
Guidance for approval COVID-19 Vaccines in India for restricted use in emergency situation which are already approved for restricted use by US FDA, EMA, UK MHRA, PMDA Japan or which are listed in WHO Emergency Use Listing (EUL)
S.O.1511(E) Dt. 18.05.2020_Regulations for manufacture and stock of vaccines for COVID-19 under Section 26B and S.O.553(E) dated 09.02.2022- Stockpiling of new drug under phase 3 of clinical trial_NDCTR,2019
Additional laboratories approved as Central Testing Laboratories for testing of Covid-19 Vaccines