Fayette County Board of Education�Monthly Finance Report: December 2025
February 18, 2026 (BFAC)
LIFELONG
LEARNER
CIVICALLY ENGAGED AND
CULTURALLY COMPETENT
Portrait of a Graduate
REFLECTIVE
AND RESILIENT
FUTURE AND
LIFE READY
Student Achievement
Unity, Belonging, and Student Efficacy
Highly Effective, Culturally Responsive Workforce
Outreach and Engagement
Organizational Health and Effectiveness
Improve student achievement through rigorous curriculum and instruction providing students with evidence-based educational experiences that not only engage but also excite, prepare, and support students.
Foster and instill a culture of unity, belonging, and student efficacy across the district and address opportunity gaps.
Hire, support, and retain a highly effective, culturally responsive and diverse workforce.
Effectively engage students, employees, families, and community members to improve opportunities and outcomes for all students.
Foster a culture of continuous improvement to maximize organizational effectiveness and efficiency, support the well-being of our team members, and provide formal recognition of their efforts.
Strategic Priorities
General Fund Comparison
| FY 2024-25 | FY 2024-25 | FY 2025-26 | FY 2025-26 |
| Working Budget | Year-to-Date Actuals through Dec. 31 (audited) | Working Budget | Year-to-Date Actuals through Dec. 31 (unaudited) |
Total Revenues | $671,645,782 | $367,636,483 (55% of budget) | $690,677,989 | $404,308,604 (59% of budget) |
Total Expenses | $671,645,782 | $217,596,958 (32% of budget) | $690,677,989 | $217,544,444 (32% of budget) |
Carryforward Balance | $43,650,000 | $41,773,740 | $26,387,429 | $28,361,788 |
Fund Balance | | $150,039,525 | | $186,764,160 |
Encumbrances | | $9,045,897 | | $5,721,638 |
General Fund Comparison
Provides a year-over-year financial snapshot comparing December 2026 to December 2025.
Take-a-Ways:
Revenue FY 2024-25 vs FY 2025-26 (unaudited)
Revenue FY 2024-25 vs FY 2025-26 (unaudited)
Expenses FY 2024-25 vs FY 2025-26 (unaudited)
General Fund Revenue
General Fund Revenue
Breaks down the district's incoming funds, showing a total year-to-date operating revenue of the working budget.
Take-a-Ways:
General Fund Expenses
General Fund Expenses
Details the district's spending patterns, noting the total general fund expenditures of the working budget.
Take-a-Ways:
Safety Tax Summary
| 2025-26 Budget | Revenue | Expenses to Date | Remaining Budget | Spent |
SEL Instruction | $ 709,813.90 | $ 709,813.90 | $ 460,615.16 | $ 249,198.74 | 65% |
Mental Health Professionals & Nurses | $ 11,077,198.64 | $ 11,077,198.64 | $ 4,436,040.53 | $ 6,641,158.11 | 40% |
Tax Collection | $ 245,000.00 | $ 245,000.00 | $ 235,000.00 | $ 10,000.00 | 96% |
Risk Management | $ 2,748,211.87 | $ 2,748,211.87 | $ 980,656.24 | $ 1,767,555.63 | 36% |
Security | $ 4,719,775.59 | $ 4,719,775.59 | $ 3,337,669.72 | $ 1,382,105.87 | 71% |
Other Safety | $ 0.00 | $ 0.00 | $ 0.00 | $ 0.00 | 0% |
Total | $ 19,500,000.00 | $ 19,500,000.00 | $ 9,449,981.65 | $ 10,050,018.35 | 48% |
Additional Safety Investment
Budget: $6,939,856 YTD Exp: $3,863,763
Safety Tax
Outlines the utilization of the safety tax, showing overall expenditure.
Take-a-Ways:
Investments General Fund
Investments General Fund
Summarizes the district’s investment portfolio, detailing the scheduled par amount in investments that are set to mature between January and June 2026.
Take-a-Ways:
Additional Information
CHECKPOINT ANALYSIS
Reviewers should consider actuals, budget appropriation, available budget for the remainder of the year, as well as percentage used. That said, percentage utilization offers a quick, effective status check related to the current budget figures.
Notes to consider when reviewing monthly finance report:
Report used for comments excludes on-behalf (object 0280 and project 16MX).
As of December, period 6 of FY26, employees on contract less than 12 months were issued 9 of 24 pays, and employees on 12-month contracts were issued 12 of 24 pays. Generally, then, the budget for salaries (0100) and fringe (0200) should reflect approximately 37.5% and 50% used, respectively. Instruction (function 1000) mostly consists of employees on less than 12-month contracts, whereas business support services (function 2500) and district administrative support (function 2300) should consist mostly of employees on 12-month contracts, etc.
�
Additional Information
�
Additional Information
PURCHASING FACTORS
As purchasing schedules vary, a discussion with each department is necessary to determine the status of their spending plans. A uniform spending plan would reflect approximately 50% utilization as of period 6. However, upfront costs, such as contract renewals, fall event registrations, and initial supplies, or facilities emergencies could significantly increase actual usage early in the year. Additionally, use of rollup codes allows some flexibility in departmental spending, but it could allow for significant overspending in one specific object code though total departmental spending remains within budget.
��
Additional Information
THE SCALE FACTORS
Also, it is important to consider the scale of the figures when reviewing percentage utilization. For instance, percent utilization in function 1000, series 0400 and 0500 is 146% and 90%, respectively, but the total expected expenditures are less than $200K in each. Note has been made but without great concern at this time, though spending will continue to be monitored.
���
Additional Information (Expense Functions)
Function 1000: Instruction - On Track: overall budget utilization = 25%
0400 reflects 146% used – Major influence: $55K expensed, $55K encumbered, against a zero budget at the stables, land and building rent (0541179-0441-DWIDE). Expense was not included in the working budget.
0500 reflects 90% used - Major influence: tuition costs ($28K spent against a $32K budget for opportunity middle college tuition) and impact from roll-up code usage. There is spending in SEC6 projects in 0500 series codes without budget assignment, but the school is within their budget overall.
0700 reflects 84% used – Major influence: $423K was spent on the renewal of Infinite Campus against a budget of $395K in project “TECH.”
�
Additional Information (Expense Functions)
Function 2100: Student Support Services - On Track: overall budget utilization = 34.5%
Salaries and fringe include admin (12-month) and school support (less than 12 month) staff.
Function 2200: Instructional Staff Support Services - On Track: overall budget utilization = 43.9%
Salaries and fringe include admin (12-month) and school support (less than 12 month) staff.
0400 reflects 89% of $103K budget.
0600 reflects 87% used - Major influence: $4.9MM of the $5.8MM budgeted has been used/encumbered to date. $4MM against a budgeted $3.8MM for curriculum was spent paying Benchmark, Curriculum Assoc, and Savvas.
��
Additional Information (Expense Functions)
Function 2300: District Admin Support - On track: overall budget utilization = 71.9%
Salaries and fringe just over targeted 50%.
0300 reflects 95% used - Major influence: tax collection costs account for $4.9MM of the $5.7MM budget, of which $4.5MM has been paid to date (bulk of tax collection fees generally paid Oct-Dec).
Function 2400: School Admin Support - On Track: overall budget utilization = 38.2%
Salary and fringe consists mostly of principals and principal office support staff (12-month and less than 12 month staff).
��
Additional Information (Expense Functions)
Function 2500: Business Support Services - On Track, Monitoring: overall budget utilization = 56.7%
0500 reflects 108% used – Major influence: Insurance is approximately 90% of the $5.9MM budget. Premiums were paid for FY26 at the beginning of year and overall approximately $740K over budget. Coding issues to be resolved in January; expect to be on-track by February.
0700 reflects 94% used - Major influence: FY26 renewal cost for IIQ paid in Aug, in addition to over expenditures in project PBA ($180K spent against a $71K budget).
0800 reflects 89% used - Major influence: Retirement fees make up 81% of the budgeted $617K in the 0800 series. $530K paid through Dec, $500K budgeted.
Function 2600: Plant Operations & Maintenance - Adjustments to follow
Adjustments to follow given pending budget amendments and expense recoding in response to nickel 2 audit comment. Coding issues to be resolved in January; expect to be on-track by February.
Series 0300 and 0700 reflect expected overages due to Sonitrol payments.
Salaries and fringe are running slightly high.
�
Additional Information (Expense Functions)
Function 2700: Student Transportation - Monitoring: overall budget utilization = 41%
Salaries and fringe should be closer to 40% utilized.
0700 reflects 98% used - This is the result of Transact communication bus tablets and subscription purchase; assume no additional purchases for transportation software.
Function 2900: Other Instructional - On Track: overall budget utilization = 40.3%
Salaries and fringe include admin (12-month) and school support (less than 12 month) staff.
Function 5200: Fund Transfers
0900 reflected 328% used – transfer revenue to FUND 52 in the amount of $2.2MM. Budget is $800K (for KETS). ASP offset approximately $1.6MM in GF salary expense for net GF expense of approximately $600K related to workbook reconciliations
�
Additional Information (Expense Summary)
Category (Current Budget Percentages) | FY26 % Spent by 12/31 |
Instruction | 25% |
Student Support | 34.5% |
Instructional Support | 44% |
District Admin Support | 72% (This is because of Sheriff tax fees timing) |
School Admin Support Transportation | 38% 41% |
Plant Operations | 51% |
Total General Fund | 31% |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS
Key Analysis Points
Key facts:
The actual financial evidence shows:
Additional Information (Revenue Analysis)
Property Tax: Trending ahead of schedule at this point for the General Fund. Note: Building Fund 320 also receives property taxes and will be at 100% by fiscal year end.
Motor Vehicle Tax: Trending to outperform last year by approximately $2 million.
Utility Tax: Trending to be flat at this point. Note: The reporting structure for this revenue has changed and thus information on collection is delayed monthly. We anticipate meeting the budget.
Additional Information (Revenue Analysis)
Investment Earnings: Trending to be approximately $600K more than budgeted. If trends continue, we may exceed over $1 million more than budgeted in this source.
SEEK Revenue: Currently trending approximately $4.3 million more than last year at this time.
Interfund Transfers: Trending approximately $942K less this year than year. Due primarily to less federal grant funding for indirect cost. However, the trend is currently indicating that we will meet the budgeted amount.
Occupational Tax, Medicaid Funding and Sale of Assets: Are revenue sources, that we are monitoring closely related to the economy, processing rule changes and real estate market. �
Checkpoint Summary
As of Dec. 31, 2025, general fund expenditures total approximately $217.5 million—essentially unchanged from the same point last year. At the same time, revenues are more than $36 million higher than last year, resulting in a general fund balance of approximately $186.8 million, compared to about $150 million at this point last year. In other words, the district is currently in a better financial position, not worse. Approximately 85 percent of the district’s budget is driven by salaries and benefits for employees. Those costs are being managed within the board-approved budget and are tracking at or below planned levels.. The district is also carrying fewer outstanding encumbrances than it did at this time last year, further indicating that spending commitments are being carefully managed.
Taken together, the financial data show that Fayette County Public Schools is not overspending. Revenues are higher, expenses are stable, fund balance is stronger, and budget execution is ahead of schedule. The district’s actual financial condition, which remains aligned with the board-approved financial plan and focused on long-term fiscal stability. There is no indication of a structural or operational overrun at this junction of checkpoint point-in-time analysis.