MOTIVATION
MEANING
Motivation is the word derived from the word ’motive’ which means needs, desires, wants or drives within the individuals. It is the process of stimulating people to actions to accomplish the goals. In the work goal context the psychological factors stimulating the people’s behaviour can be -
NATURE OF MOTIVATION
MASLOW’S NEED HIRARCHY MODEL
History
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs was first introduced in Abraham Maslow’s 1943 paper, “A Theory of Human Motivation”. Maslow later refined this theory in 1954 with his book, “Motivation and Personality“. Since then, this theory has remained a popular subject in sociology, management training, and psychology classes.
Levels of Hierarchy
There are five main levels to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. These levels begin from the most basic needs to the most advanced needs. Maslow originally believed that a person needed to completely satisfy one level to begin pursuing further levels.
MASLOW’S NEED HIRARCHY MODEL
MASLOW’S NEED HIRARCHY MODEL
MASLOW’S NEED HIRARCHY MODEL
HERZBERG’S MOTIVATION-HYGIENE MODEL
Herzberg’s Motivation Theory model, or Two Factor Theory, argues that there are two factors that an organization can adjust to influence motivation in the workplace.
These factors are:
Motivators: Which can encourage employees to work harder. The presence of motivators causes employees to work harder. They are found within the actual job itself
Hygiene factors: These won’t encourage employees to work harder but they will cause them to become unmotivated if they are not present.
Herzberg’s Theory of Motivation tries to get to the root of motivation in the workplace. A manager can leverage this theory to help you get the best performance from his team.
The two factors identified by Herzberg are motivators and hygiene factors.
HERZBERG’S MOTIVATION-HYGIENE MODEL
Motivating Factors includes
HERZBERG’S MOTIVATION-HYGIENE MODEL
Hygiene factors includes
HERZBERG’S MOTIVATION-HYGIENE MODEL
VROOM’S VALENCE-EXPECTANCY THEORY
Attacking Herzberg’s two-factor theory, vroom offered an expectancy approach to the understanding of motivation. According to him, a person’s motivation towards an action at any time would be determined by his anticipated values of all the outcomes of the action multiplied by the strength of that person’s expectancy that the outcome would yeild the desire goal. In other words, motivation is the product of anticipated worth to a person of an actionand the perceived probability that the persons goals would be achieved.
The theory suggests that although individuals may have different sets of goals, they can be motivated if they believe that:
VROOM’S VALENCE-EXPECTANCY THEORY
Vroom’s theory may be expressed by the following formula :
FORCE= VALENCE×EXPECTANCY×INSTRUMENTALITY.
VROOM’S VALENCE-EXPECTANCY THEORY
Conclusion
Vroom suggests that an employee's beliefs about Expectancy, Instrumentality, and Valence interact psychologically to create a motivational force such that the employee acts in ways that bring pleasure and avoid pain.
In essence, Vroom emphasised the importance of individual perception and assessments of organisational behaviour. What is important here is that what the individual perceives as the consequence of a perticular behaviour is far more important than what the manager belives the individual should perceive. Thus, Vroom’s model attempts to explain how individual’s goals influence his efforts and like Maslow’s and Herzberg’s models, reveals that behaviour is goal-oriented.
VROOM’S VALENCE-EXPECTANCY THEORY
MCGREGOR’E ‘THEORY X’ AND 'THEORY Y’
In the 1960s, social psychologist Douglas McGregor developed two contrasting theories that explained how managers' beliefs about what motivates their people can affect their management style. He labelled these Theory X and Theory Y. These theories continue to be important even today.
Douglas McGregor work is established in motivation theory. Mr. McGregor postulated 2 theories on human management and leadership which are Theory X and Theory Y.
MCGREGOR’E ‘THEORY X’ AND 'THEORY Y’
Theory X
Theory X indicates the traditional approach to managerial motivation and control. It represents old stereotyped and authoritarian management style of motivation. The underlying assumptions of this theory are as follows :
MCGREGOR’E ‘THEORY X’ AND 'THEORY Y’
Theory Y
Theory Y managers have an optimistic, positive opinion of their people, and they use a decentralized, participative management style. This encourages a more collaborative, trust-based relationship between managers and their team members.
MCGREGOR’E ‘THEORY X’ AND 'THEORY Y’
PORTER AND LAWLER’S MODEL
Porter and Lawler's theory is an improvement over Vroom's expectancy theory. They say that motivation does not equal satisfaction or performance. The model suggested by them encounters some of the simplistic traditional assumptions made about the positive relationship between satisfaction and performance. They proposed a multivariate model to explain the complex relationship that exists between satisfaction and performance. What is the main point in Porter and Lawler's model is that effort or motivation does not lead directly to performance.
This model encounters some of the simplistic traditional assumptions about the positive relationship between satisfaction and performance. The emphasis in expectancy theory on rationality and expectations seems to us to describe best kinds of cognition that influence managerial performance.
PORTER AND LAWLER’S MODEL
PORTER AND LAWLER’S MODEL
MCCLELLAND’S THREE NEED MODEL
David McClelland built on this work in his 1961 book, "The Achieving Society." He identified three motivators that he believed we all have: a need for achievement, a need for affiliation, and a need for power. People will have different characteristics depending on their dominant motivator.
According to McClelland, these motivators are learned (which is why this theory is sometimes called the Learned Needs Theory).
McClelland says that, regardless of our gender, culture, or age, we all have three motivating drivers, and one of these will be our dominant motivating driver. This dominant motivator is largely dependent on our culture and life experiences.
These charecters are as follows :
MCCLELLAND’S THREE NEED MODEL
Dominant Motivater : Achivement
MCCLELLAND’S THREE NEED MODEL
Dominant Motivater : Affiliation
Dominant Motivater : Power
MCCLELLAND’S THREE NEED MODEL
JOB ENRICHMENT
Job enrichment attempts to give employees greater responsibility by increasing the range and complexity of tasks they are called upon to complete and giving them the necessary authority. It motivates by giving employees the opportunity to use their abilities to the fullest.
In other words, it means adding a few more motivators to a job to make it more rewarding. To be specific, a job is enriched when the nature of the job is exciting, challenging and creative, or given the job holder more decision-making, planning and controlling power. Thus, job enrichment loads the job vertically. It tries to deal with dissatisfaction by increasing job depth as work activities from a vertical slice of the organisational unit are combined in one job.
Job enrichment is based upon the intrinsic reward theory – the reward should be built into the job. It is more effective and long-lasting than extrinsic rewards which are in the form of additional benefits like productivity bonus, better pay, perks, etc. Job enrichment makes the job more pleasant and gives a sense of accomplishment.
JOB ENRICHMENT