Second/Foreign Language�Teaching Methodologies
Presented by: Li Shengxi
Luan Lei
Ma Huan
Ye Min
MA 03
Outline
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The Grammar-Translation Method
Ⅲ. The Direct Methods
Ⅳ. Audio-lingual Method
Ⅴ. Communicative Language Teaching
Ⅵ. Other Teaching Methods
Ⅶ. Summary
Ⅰ. Introduction
i. What Is Teaching Method?
Teaching method is a way of teaching a language which is based on systematic principles and procedures, i.e., which is an application of views on how a language is best taught and learned.
ii. Seven Teaching Methodologies
Ⅱ. The Grammar-Translation Method
i. Background
The grammar-translation method of foreign language teaching is one of the most tradi-tional methods, dating back to the late nine-teenth and early twentieth centuries. It was originally used to teach 'dead' languages (and literatures) such as Latin and Greek, and this may account for its heavy bias to-wards written work to the virtual exclusion
of oral production.
ii. The Principal Characteristics
iii. Drawbacks
II. The Direct Method
i. Background: a reaction to the grammar-translation approach in an attempt to integrate more use of the target language in instruction.
ii. The Principal Characteristics
iii. Drawbacks
iv. Strategies Using Direct Method
III. Audiolingual Method
i. Background
This method is based on the principles of behavior psychology. It adapted many of the principles and procedures of the Direct Method, in part as a re-action to the lack of speaking skills of the Reading Approach.
ii. The Method Characteristics
iii. Strategies
Ⅳ. Communicative Language Teaching
i. Background
The communicative approach could be said to be the product of educators and linguists who had grown dissatisfied with the audio-lingual and grammar-translation methods of foreign language instruction.
The origins of Communicative Language Teaching are to be found in the changes in the British languages teaching tradi-tion dating from the late 1960s. Interest in and development of communicative-style teaching mushroomed in the 1970s; authentic language use and classroom exchanges where students engaged in real communication with one another became quite popular.
ii. The Principal Characteristics
The role of the instructor in CLT is quite differ-ent from traditional teaching methods. In the traditional classroom, the teacher is in charge and "controls" the learning. In CLT the teacher serves as more of a facilitator, allowing stu-dents to be in charge of their own learning.
Language is used for communication. For this reason, CLT makes use of communication to teach languages. CLT emphasizes real-life situ-ations and communica-tion in context. While gra-mmar is still important in the CLT classroom, the emphasis is on communi-cating a message.
CLT also stresses social and situational contexts of communi-cation. In CLT, stu-dents learn about language in social contexts, such as the difference between speaking with an elder and a peer.
iii. CLT and Multimedia
Multimedia is an ideal way to teach lan-guage using CLT as the theory. It allows for realistic simulations of communicative situ-ations. Many such programs are games, such as "A la rencontre de Philipe" or "Who is Oscar Lake?". They place the learner in a situation in which understanding basic com-munication, and social and cultural contexts are vital to advancing in the game.
Ⅵ. Other Teaching Methods
i. Humanism is described in applied linguistics as ‘language teaching respecting the integrity of learners, allowing for per-sonal growth and responsibility, taking psychological and affective factors into account, and representing “whole person learning”’. The roots of humanism in lan-guage teaching are various. One central one is the ‘discovery-learning’ movement.
Characteristics�(take that of the Silent Way as an example)
ii. Task-based Teaching
Task-based teaching has become a subject of keen contemporary interest, and different task-based approaches exist today. One underlying principle holds for all the approaches – to place the emphasis firmly on activities or tasks that learners do in class. One thing should be men-tioned is that, there are a number of features that will make tasks more or less difficult. So that we can progressively give our learners tasks where there are more and more things to think about, and consequently less and less attention available for form.
Ⅶ. Summary
i. Comparison of Different Teaching Method
Figure 1. Teacher & Learner Roles in Different Teaching Methods
Method | Teacher’s Roles | Learner’s Roles |
Situational language Teaching | Context Setter�Error Corrector | Imitator�Memorizer |
Audio-lingualism | Language Modeler�Drill Leader | Pattern Practicer�Accuracy Enthusiast |
Communicative Language Teaching | Needs Analyst�Task Designer | Improviser�Negotiator |
Total Physical Response | Commander�Action Monitor | Commander�Action Monitor |
Community Language Learning | Counselor�Paraphraser | Collaborator�Whole Person |
The Natural Approach | Actor Props User | Guesser Immerser |
Suggestopedia | Auto-hypnotist�Authority Figure | Relaxer�True-Believer |
ii. What's Now, What's Next?
The future is always uncertain, and this is no less true in anticipating methodological directions in second language teaching than in any other field. Some current predictions assume the carrying on and refinement of current trends; others appear a bit more science-fiction-like in their vision.
However, the future of L2 teaching methodologies, as yet not fully explored, is associated with what might be called a ‘cognitive approach to language learning’. Perhaps this cognitive, or information-processing approach is where the future lies.