KOLB’S EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING THEORY (KELT)
By:
Brooke Doughtie
Jaclyna Perez
Michelle Wisdom
Penny Wise
KELT
A learning theory and instructional design model
Summary of KELT
According to Kolb, learning takes place through experience. There are four stages of learning, and “each stage provide[s] a step of experiential learning” (Vinales, 2015, p. 456). The four stages are: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. Kolb then identifies learning styles based upon the preferred combination of stages: divergers (concrete experiences and reflection observations), assimilators (reflective observation and abstract conceptualization), accommodators (abstract conceptualization and active experimentation), and convergers (active experimentation and concrete experiences) (Gooden, 2009, p. 58).
Key Elements of KELT
The four stages of the experiential learning process.
Concrete experience: Learning takes place through active participation.
Observation and reflection (reflective observation): Learning takes place through watching a model or mentor and then objectively thinking about what happened.
Abstract conceptualization: Learning takes place through the creation of an idea or a theory OR reviewing the concepts.
Testing concepts in new situations (active experimentation): Learning takes place through testing/experiments.
(Dunn, 2002, p. 2) and (Vinales, 2015, p. 456)
(Vinales, 2015, p. 456)
The four learning styles of the experiential learning model.
Divergers learn through experience and research/observations.
Assimilators learn through connecting information and formulating their own conclusions.
Convergers learn through formulating concepts and applying them.
Accommodators learn through experience and active involvement in experiments.
(Gooden, 2009, p. 58)
(Gooden, 2009, p. 58)
KELT Compared to Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory
Both Kolb’s experiential learning theory and Vygotsky’s social development theory recognize that:
| Experiential Learning Theory | Social Development Theory |
Learning occurs: | -during four stages: concrete experiences, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. -when new ideas or formed, or old ideas are improved based upon experiences (Kolb, 1984, p. 28). | -in the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)--an area where Spontaneous Experimental Concepts and Scientific Abstract Concepts meet and that is just out of reach of our abilities or comfort zone. “The zone allows performance before competence to happen” (Wink & Putney, 2002, p. 94-95). -through a scaffolding of information or the, “support a teacher or tutor provides in helping children move from joint to independent problem solving” (Wink & Putney, 2002, p. 152). |
The factors that influence learning include: | -the individual learning style of the student (Gooden, 2009, p. 58) -the types of experiences (Dunn, 2002, p. 2) -the instructional delivery (Gooden, 2009, p. 59) | -Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), in which the student works at a level that is considered slightly above the student’s perceived ability level -The influence and guidance of people more knowledgeable/capable than the learner (Carroll & Wilson, 2008, p. 250-251) |
What is the role of memory? | Memories, in terms of ideas, are to be “dispose[d] of or modif[ied]” through examination and testing (Kolb, 1984, p. 28). | “Voluntary memory [is] carried out initially between the child and adults or more capable peers” until they are able to do it themselves (Schneider, 1996, p. 157) |
How does transfer occur? | New ideas occur through integration (an implantation of a new idea) or substitution (a revision of an old idea) (Kolb, 1984, p. 28). | Knowledge is gradually transferred from the adult to the child through activities in the ZPD as “the types of assistance provided by the adult…[are] internalized by the child” (Schneider, 1996, p. 157-158). |
| Experiential Learning Theory | Social Development Theory |
The goal of the theory is to account for: | ”the role that experience plays in the learning process” (Kolb, 1984, p. 20). | reasoning that is, “socially constructed through interaction with adults and peers” (Wink & Putney, 2002, p. 30). |
The analysis of learning sees learning as: | -a holistic combination of “experience, perception, cognition, and behavior” (Kolb, 1984, p. 21). -a process through the formation and reformation of thought based upon experience. (Kolb, 1984, p. 26) | “a mediated activity, which occurred first during social interaction” (Wink & Putney, 2002, p. 30). “learning leads our development through the use of language as a cultural tool” (Wink & Putney, 2002, p. 31). |
Focuses of analysis: | -experience | -peer/mentor influence |
The types of learning that are best explained by the theory include: | Experiential learning | Social constructivism |
What basic assumptions/principles of this theory are relevant to instructional design? | -The effectiveness of a lesson is dependent on both the delivery method as well as the differences learning styles (Gooden, 2009, p. 59). -Different types of experiences are required in order to address the different types of learning and the different types of learners. | Through discourse, peer interaction, and teacher assistance, the student can move from the concrete knowing to abstract ideas by learning in the ZPD or as Vygotsky (1962) related they can transverse, “the distance between the actual developmental level as determined by independent problem solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers” (Carroll & Wilson, 2008, p. 250). |
| Experiential Learning Theory | Social Development Theory |
How should instruction be structured to facilitate learning? | According to Gooden (2009), several approaches can address the different learning styles including: lectures, computer-based simulation exercises, scenario planning, role play, projects, case analysis, and case in point (p. 60). Instruction should include real world tasks such as modeling information, offering multiple perspectives, debates, and use of real life scenarios (Ertmer & Newby, 2013, 58). Instruction should provide both opportunities for learners to tap into their previous knowledge as well as “experiences from which they can learn by analyzing them” (Knowles, 1996, p. 256) | According to Carroll and Wilson (2008), instructors should provide: -opportunities for discourse in order to allow students to brainstorm ideas, - activities that allow students to compare and contrast or to create “Association Complexes and Collection Complexes” to connect new concepts to prior knowledge and concrete ideas, - analysis activities that connect learning from one activity to another to create “Chain Complexes”, - and modeling to help students “take scattered impressions and organize them” (p. 244-249). |
In looking at the classroom, we see: | -the inclusion of a variety of methods to target the different learners, including: lectures, computer-based simulation exercises, scenario planning, role play, projects, case analysis, and case in point (Gooden, 2009, p. 59) -”discussion methods and problem-solving experiences...simulation exercises and field experiences” (Knowles, 1996, p. 256) | Mentors assisting individuals by giving examples in an effort to promote a progression into independent work. “We begin learning from our interactions with others around us in our sociocultural context” (Wink & Putney, 2002, p. 91). |
In looking at a group, we stress: | learning by doing. Group participants learn “through concrete experiences from participating in the group as well as abstract conceptualizations from reading the textbook and discussing concepts” (Humphrey, 2014, p. 69). | Working together in peer/small group interactions in an effort to scaffold learning and offer assistance with the goal being independent success, Groupings such as these assist in providing “mediational mean of signs, symbols, cultural artifacts, and tools, such as number systems and language” (Wink & Putney, 2002, p. 92). |
Unit Plan Using KELT
Topic
The monarch butterfly life cycle and its impact on the environment
Audience
3rd Grade
Objectives
1). Students will be able to describe the changes a Monarch butterfly undergoes during its life cycle through investigating and recording their observations of a classroom butterfly house.
2). Students will identify and describe the flow of energy in a food chain and predict how changes in a food chain affect the ecosystem (specifically the removal of the Monarch Butterfly)
3). Students will create a sustainable solution for increasing the Monarch Butterfly population and implement this plan.
Materials
TEKS (19 TAC Chapter 112, Subchapter A., 2010)
3.4 Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student knows how to use a variety of tools and method conduct science � inquiry. The student is expected to:
A. collect, record, and analyze information using tools and materials to support observation of habitats of � organisms such as terrariums and aquariums.
3.9 Organisms and environments. The student knows that organisms have characteristics that help them survive and can � describe patterns, cycles, systems, and relationships within the environments. The student is expected to:
A. observe and describe the physical characteristics of environments and how they support populations and � communities within an ecosystem;� B. identify and describe the flow of energy in a food chain and predict how changes in a food chain affect the � ecosystem such as removal of frogs from a pond or bees from a field; and � C. describe environmental changes such as floods and droughts where some organisms thrive and others perish � or move to new locations.
3.10 Organisms and environments. The student knows that organisms undergo similar life processes and have structures � that help them survive within their environments. The student is expected to:
A. explore how structures and functions of plants and animals allow them to survive in a particular environment;� C. investigate and compare how animals and plants undergo a series of orderly changes in their diverse � life cycles.
Methodology
This unit allows for the student to interact in each of the different stages as well as the four different learning styles of Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory.
Required Prior Knowledge
Food chains/webs
Daily Lessons
Anticipatory Set.
Imagine a world without butterflies. How do you think this would affect you? (Additionally, there is a collapsible butterfly house containing monarch caterpillars in the classroom. Students can make observations and record their findings during the 4-6 week period).
Day 1.
Students are each given a card with a picture. They are not to show anyone else. The card contains either a sun, a secondary producer, a tertiary producer and a decomposer. (The PRIMARY producer is omitted). Students are assigned the task of forming a food chain with classmates. After a few minutes, the teacher will call students back and ask what happened? Discussion to follow: what happens when an animal is omitted from the food chain? Why is this important?
Days 2-7.
Students are assigned to small collaborative groups. Each group is assigned a Mac laptop, IPad, and IPod. Students will use the aforementioned technology for research, logging data via the Journey North app (Annenberg Learner Journey North 2016), taking pictures and ultimately creating a keynote presentation which will be brought before administration as a request for minor funding of this project.
Teacher introduces various websites (including Guadalupe River State Park (2016) Facebook group, Texas Parks and Wildlife (2016), PBS (Wild Kratts 2012), National Wildlife Federation (2015), and Native Plants (Wild Ones 2016) for students to research the importance of the Monarch Butterfly. In addition, a private classroom Facebook account is created in order to post updates regarding the classroom butterfly progress, as well as to connect to the local Guadalupe River State Park. The teacher then facilitates learning by assisting students as they compile research about the Monarch Butterfly, including: what it eats, its life cycle, why its population has dramatically reduced, and what implications does this have on our ecology.
Days 8 – 13.
Students will then formulate solutions for increasing the Monarch Butterfly population. Students will search out an area of the school in which to plant a butterfly garden and hang feeders. They will develop a plan of action for what materials are needed and appropriate to the development of the Monarch Butterfly species. Students will determine a maintenance schedule for garden upkeep as well as monitoring and reporting as part of the Monarch watch station. The Monarch Joint Venture (2015a) will help guide students in the process for creating an appropriate Monarch butterfly garden.
Days 14 – 18.
Students will create an appropriate Monarch Butterfly garden and register with the state to participate as members of the Monarch Watch Program (Monarch Joint Venture, 2015b). Classroom Monarch Butterflies to be released into the garden.
Assessment
Monarch Butterfly Keynote Presentation Rubric
References
References
Carroll, J. A. & Wilson, E. E. (2008). Acts of teaching: How to teach writing. Portsmouth, NH: Teacher Ideas Press.
Dunn, L. (2002). Theories of Learning [PDF]. Learning and Teaching Briefing Papers Series. Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning � Development. Retrieved from http://academic.regis.edu/ed205/Theories%20of%20Learning.pdf
Ertmer, P. A. & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design � perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43-71.
Gooden, D. J., Preziosi, R. C., & Barnes, F. B. (2009). An examination of Kolb's learning style inventory. American Journal of Business � Education, 2(3), 57-62. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1052793.pdf
Humphrey, K. R. (2014). Lessons learned from experiential group work learning, social work with groups. Social work with groups, 37(1), � 61-72 12p. Doi: 10.1080/01609513.2013.816919
Knowles, M. (1996). Adult learning. The ASTD Training and Development Handbook. R.L. Craig, ed. New York, McGraw-Hill.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning, 20-38. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Retrieved from http://academic.regis.edu/ed205/kolb.pdf
Schneider, P., & Watkins, R. (1996). Applying Vygotskian developmental theory to language intervention. Language, Speech & Hearing � Services In Schools, 27(2), 157-170 14p. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Vinales, J. J. (2015). The learning environment and learning styles: a guide for mentors. British Journal Of Nursing, 24(8), 454-457 4p. � Doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.8.454
Wink, J. and Putney, L (2002). A vision of Vygotsky. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Unit Plan References
19 TAC Chapter 112, Subchapter A. (2010). Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Science Subchapter A. Elementary. Retrieved from � http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter112/ch112a.html
Annenberg Learner Journey North. (2016). A Global Study of Wildlife Migration and Seasonal Change. Retrieved from � https://www.learner.org/jnorth/
Guadalupe River State Park-Texas Parks & Wildlife. (2016). Facebook Page. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/� Guadalupe-River-State-Park-Texas-Wildlife-166576733436020/
Monarch Joint Venture (2015a). Create Habitats for Monarchs. Retrieved from http://www.monarchjointventure.org/� get-involved/create-habitat-for-monarchs/
Monarch Joint Venture (2015b). Monarch Watch: Monarch Waystation Program. Retrieved from http://www.monarchwatch.org/� waystations/certify.html
National Wildlife Federation (2015). O’Mara, Collin. NWF President’s View: A New Call to Action to Help Monarchs. Retrieved from � https://www.nwf.org/News-and-Magazines/National-Wildlife/News-and-Views/Archives/2015/� NWF-Presidential-View-Action-for-Monarchs.aspx
Texas Parks & Wildlife. (2016) The Monarch Butterfly. Retrieved from http://tpwd.texas.gov/huntwild/wild/wildlife_diversity/� texas_nature_trackers/monarch/
Wild Kratts (2012). Raising Monarch Butterflies. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/parents/wildkratts/activities/� raising-monarch-butterflies/
Wild Ones (2016). Wild for Monarchs. Retrieved from http://www.wildones.org/learn/wild-for-monarchs/