Using IIIF to teach Digital Humanities
Practice-oriented approach to digital literacy skills
Davy Verbeke, Lise Foket, Vincent Ducatteeuw, Eef Rombaut, Frederic Lamsens, Christophe Verbruggen
IIIF Conference 2022, Harvard University, Cambridge (USA)
Ghent Centre for Digital Humanities
How to teach DH?
What is Digital Humanities?
"I want to suggest that undergraduate students do not care about digital
humanities.“
"…we lead students brand-new to DH immediately into straw-man arguments about its broadest characterizations, whether good or bad, rather than substantive investigations of specific projects, thinkers, methods, books, or articles."
What should we teach when teaching DH?
1. Discover
4. Collect
7. Enrich
9. Analyze
12. Share
13. Collaborate
3. Capture
Benefits of IIIF for DH
Premise: �How can IIIF support DH teaching?
Two scenarios
1. Virtual exhibitions with IIIF and Omeka S
2. Enriching IIIF collections with Madoc
1st scenario: Virtual exhibitions with IIIF and Omeka S �Teacher education case
Omeka S as the enabling platform
Workflow
Add digital items (often images)
Add metadata, tags, mapping
Use Storiiies / Exhibit.so
Share the collection
Create web pages
Showcase
2nd scenario: Enriching digital collections with Madoc�Feminist Poetry Case�In collaboration with Associate Professor Marianne Van Remoortel
Madoc
Poetry in 19th-century Feminist Periodicals
Import IIIF manifests (periodicals)
Create a project in Madoc
Capture model to:
Identify the poems
Next steps
→ Each student created their own project with custom capture model
→ ‘HTML content-blocks’ for general reflections and to create a virtual exhibition
End result
Reflections: �Can we teach Digital Humanities using IIIF?
Reflections on the 1st scenario
The experiences: the Good
… and some of the pitfalls
Digital competences achieved?
Survey 32 participants: indicate by a slider which competences were achieved (0 = not achieved ; 50 = sufficiently ; 100 = largely)
3. Capture
4. Collect
7. Enrich
13. Collaborate
10. Visualize
Digital competences achieved?
Survey 32 participants: indicate by a slider which competences were achieved (0 = not achieved ; 50 = sufficiently ; 100 = largely)
3. Modeling
6. Data Cleanup
1. Discover
2. Source criticism
12. Share
Digital competences achieved?
Survey 32 participants: indicate by a slider which competences were achieved (0 = not achieved ; 50 = sufficiently ; 100 = largely)
8. Automate
9. Analyze
11. Store
15. Society & Ethics
14. DH Reflection
S
W
T
O
Cfr. Davy Verbeke, SWOT-analysis for teaching with Omeka S (in Dutch)
Contact
Scientific collaborator GhentCDH
Scientific collaborator GhentCDH
PhD Student
Educational researcher cultural sciences
Software developer GhentCDH
Christophe.Verbruggen@UGent.be Director GhentCDH