1 of 16

Superintendent’s Evaluation Process Draft Goals and

Focused Indicators

October 17, 2023

Cambridge Public Schools

2 of 16

Agenda

  • Overview of the evaluation process
  • Discuss criteria for assessing performance
  • Discuss tracking progress towards goal/standard attainment
  • Discuss and review draft goals and focused standards / indicators

3 of 16

Self Assessment

Analysis, Goal Setting and Plan Development

Implementation of the plan

Formative Assessment/ Evaluation

Summative Evaluation

1

2

3

4

5

4 of 16

Goal Alignment

District Goals

School Improvement

Plans/Goals

Administrator Goals

Educator Goals

Student Achievement

District Plan

District Plan

Student Achievement

5 of 16

Superintendent’s Evaluation Process

District Improvement Goals

(2-4 goals)

Professional Goals

  • Student Learning Goal
  • Professional Practice Goal

Evidence towards standards in the Superintendent’s Rubric

  • Advised by DESE to select 6-8 focus indicators
  • Ongoing, clear, and honest feedback and communication is key to supporting the Superintendent in reaching the goals and attaining proficiency on the standards and indicators.

6 of 16

Strategic Initiatives

Throughlines: Accountability * Coherence * Transparency * Equity lens

6

OBJECTIVE 1:

Deliver Ambitious Instruction & Effective Supports

OBJECTIVE 2:

Provide Accessible College & Career Pathways

OBJECTIVE 3:

Implement Effective Staff Learning & Support

OBJECTIVE 4:

Build Welcoming & Supportive Schools & District

1. Define a districtwide

instructional framework that guides consistent, high-quality instruction in every classroom.

4. Collaborate to implement city-wide plan for universal preschool

to promote equitable

access as a foundation for student success.

7. Strengthen and expand

educator and leader career pathway programs, prioritizing hard-to-staff roles and diversification of staff.

10. Improve families’ access to resources within and

beyond CPS

2. Align instructional practices and resources to

instructional framework

across content areas and grade bands.

5. Implement a system of individualized student success planning and

supports that prepare

students for effective transitions and

post-graduation success.

8. Establish a comprehensive, role-based professional

learning strategy and system

that improves practices in alignment with district vision.

11. Promote positive school cultures and climate through

district-wide vision of

inclusive and restorative discipline policies and practices.

3. Establish robust

multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS)

to support students’

academic, social, emotional, and behavioral needs.

6. Embed college & career exploration and experiences across the

JK-12 continuum.

9. Improve evaluation systems for all staff to support

professional growth as part

of a culture of continuous improvement.

12. Develop a multi-year facilities improvement

plan based on

pending building study.

= ongoing

= achieved

7 of 16

Superintendent’s Rubric

Four Standards

  • Superintendent’s are advised by DESE 6-8 focus indicators.
  • Focus indicators will focus the evaluation, including evidence collection.

Instructional Leadership

1

2

Management and Operations

3

Family and Community Engagement

4

Professional Culture

21 Indicators aligned to 4 standards.

  • Should concerns arise in indicators other than those we agree to as the focus indicators, School Committee members should raise their concerns as a formative part of the process.

8 of 16

Criteria for Assessing Performance:

Do we have a shared understanding of the difference between the performance at “Exemplary, Proficient, Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory Levels?”

Exemplary

Represents a level of performance that

exceeds the already high Standard of proficient. This is reserved for performance that is of such a high level that it could serve

as a model.

Proficient

Represents a performance level that is understood to be fully

satisfactory. This is the rigorous expected level of performance; demanding but attainable.

Needs Improvement

Represents a level of performance that is below the requirements of a Standard but is not considered to be Unsatisfactory at the time. Improvement is necessary and expected.

Unsatisfactory

Represents a rating that is merited when performance has not significantly improved following a rating of Needs Improvement, or performance is consistently below the requirements of a Standard and is considered inadequate or both.

9 of 16

Tracking Progress towards attaining Goals and Standards

Noting/Tracking the progress updates overtime

Intentional tracking system to

be able to share feedback and keep up with performance so that at the end of the evaluation cycle (summative), performance is rated for the entire year.

Suggestion: Develop a group tracking system to keep a log of performance.

Leverage Regular Public Meetings Progress updates about district priorities related to district improvement, student learning, and leadership development.

Suggestion: Superintendent will share information and artifacts aligned to the key performance indicators (KPIs)

Superintendent and School Committee Members

Discuss progress towards

goals and Standards throughout the year. Suggestion: During 1:1 and small group meetings and through the Weekly.

2

1

3

10 of 16

Discussion

Do you have any clarifying questions?

Share thoughts, ideas and feedback on the evaluation process and or tracking progress over time

What suggestions do you have for us to calibrate on the criteria for assessing progress? What next steps should we take?

11 of 16

Draft Goals, Focused Standards/Indicators, and Proposed Evidence and Artifacts

12 of 16

Superintendent Draft Goals and Indicators

Goal Type

Goal Description

Standard/Focused Indicator

Key Performance Indicator(s)

Goal 1: Student Learning

Chronic Absenteeism

As a result of developing a comprehensive outreach plan to students and families and targeted interventions to schools, by June 30, 2023 the district-wide chronic absentee rate for students will be reduced by 2.0 points.

Standard I: Instructional Leadership

Indicator I-B-3: Meeting diverse needs

  • Monitor quarterly absenteeism reports
  • Engagement of students/parents/ caregivers of targeted students

Goal 2: Student Learning Academic Achievement

By June 30, 2023, high needs students in grades 3-8 will exceed typical growth (100+) in Math and Reading as evidenced by the iReady Benchmark Assessments.

Standard I: Instructional Leadership

Indicator I-A-1: Standards-based units and lesson support Indicator I-B-3: Meeting diverse needs

  • Frequency and focus of data team meetings
  • Frequency of

school-wide learning walks

Goal 3: Professional Practice and District Improvement Learning Walks

By June 30, 2023, I will participate in 85% of the learning walks conducted this school year and will develop structures for increased collaboration and communication between school and district leaders.

Standard I: Instructional Leadership

Indicator I-D-3: Observation and Feedback Standard II: Management and Operations

Indicator II-C-1:Time for teaching and learning

  • Frequency of collaboration sessions
  • Improved feedback on administrator and educator evaluations

13 of 16

Superintendent Draft Goals and Indicators

Goal Type

Goal Description

Standard/Focused Indicator

Key Performance Indicator(s)

Goal 4: Professional Practice

ELT Checks and Balances

By June 30, 2023, I will develop a structure to manage the work and projects that ELT members are responsible for and will meet bi-weekly with individual members to review and discuss the work they supervise.

Standard II: Management and Operations Indicator II-B-1:

Recruitment and Hiring Strategies

Standard IV: Professional Culture Indicator IV-E-1: Shared Vision

  • Frequency of meetings
  • Improved management, collaboration, follow-up and support to team members

Goal 5: District Improvement Superintendent Family/Caregiver and Community Advisory Council

By June 30, 2023, I will design and establish an advisory council of family/caregivers and community representatives to create stronger collaborative relationships, provide equity of voice in problem solving and decision-making, and provide a proactive means to support the school community.

Standard III: Family and Community Engagement Indicator III-A-2: Community and Stakeholder Engagement

Standard IV: Professional Culture Indicator IV-F-2: Consensus Building

  • Frequency of meetings
  • Increased engagement of diverse family/caregivers and stakeholders

14 of 16

Superintendent Draft Goals and Indicators

Goal Type

Goal Description

Standard/Focused Indicator

Key Performance Indicator(s)

Goal 6: District Improvement Student Success Planning

By June 30, 2023, I

will lead a team to develop a framework for individualized student success planning in CPS based on the model from Harvard Ed ReDesign.

Standard I: Instructional Leadership Indicator I-B-3: Meeting diverse needs

Standard III: Family and Community Engagement Indicator III-A-2: Family and Stakeholder Engagement

Standard IV: Professional Culture Indicator IV-F-2:

Consensus Building

  • Participation in Harvard’s community of practice
  • Implementation and data from a pilot of a student success planning component

15 of 16

Types of Evidence and Artifacts

Evidence

Artifacts

Presentation Documents

School Committee Meeting Presentations

SC Weekly Communicating w/SC

Individual and Small Group Meetings w/SC Members

Sampling of documents/correspondence

Meeting Agendas

Survey data

Reports (Various)

Observation protocols and documents

16 of 16

Discussion

What feedback or suggestions do you have about the goals or focused Standards / Indicators?

Do you have any clarifying questions?

What feedback or suggestions do you have about the evidence or artifacts you expect to see?