1 of 32

Monitoring biodiversity �for human, animal and environmental health

October 23, 2025

Francis Banville, PhD

Université de Montréal & GEO BON One Health working group

Canada

1

LIVING DATA 2025

2 of 32

Human health is linked to animal and environmental health

One Health working group

2

LIVING DATA 2025

3 of 32

Human health is linked to animal and environmental health

One Health working group

3

LIVING DATA 2025

4 of 32

Human health is linked to animal and environmental health

One Health working group

Figure by

The Regents of the University of California, Davis campus

4

LIVING DATA 2025

5 of 32

Main objective

One Health working group

Can we reuse existing indicators for monitoring One Health actions?

biodiversity

5

LIVING DATA 2025

6 of 32

We evaluated indicators from the KM-GBF

One Health working group

6

LIVING DATA 2025

7 of 32

Are any KM-GBF indicators linked to Health?

One Health working group

204 indicators

?

7

LIVING DATA 2025

8 of 32

Are any KM-GBF indicators linked to Health?

One Health working group

We classified each indicator in relation to Health

human

health

animal

health

plant

health

environmental health

indicator 1

direct link

direct link

no link

direct link

indicator 2

indirect link

potential link

potential link

no link

direct link > indirect link > potential link > no link

?

8

LIVING DATA 2025

9 of 32

Are any KM-GBF indicators linked to Health?

One Health working group

Headline indicator 7.2 :

Pesticide environment concentration and/or aggregated total applied toxicity

Definition (Aggregated total applied toxicity): Risk to ecological communities […] from the annual outdoor, agricultural, forestry and public health use of total pesticides […].

9

LIVING DATA 2025

10 of 32

Are any KM-GBF indicators linked to Health?

One Health working group

Headline indicator 7.2 :

Pesticide environment concentration and/or aggregated total applied toxicity

human

health

animal

health

plant

health

environmental health

indicator 7.2

direct link

direct link

direct link

direct link

direct link > indirect link > potential link > no link

10

LIVING DATA 2025

11 of 32

Are any KM-GBF indicators linked to Health?

One Health working group

Definition: Percentage of water bodies […] with good ambient water quality. “Good” indicates an ambient water quality that does not damage ecosystem function or human health […]

Component indicator 11.CT.2 :

Proportion of bodies of water with good ambient water quality

11

LIVING DATA 2025

12 of 32

Are any KM-GBF indicators linked to Health?

One Health working group

Component indicator 11.CT.2 :

Proportion of bodies of water with good ambient water quality

human

health

animal

health

plant

health

environmental health

indicator 11.CT.2

direct link

direct link

direct link

direct link

direct link > indirect link > potential link > no link

12

LIVING DATA 2025

13 of 32

Are any KM-GBF indicators linked to Health?

One Health working group

75% of KM-GBF indicators are directly or indirectly linked with human, animal, plant or environmental health

13

LIVING DATA 2025

14 of 32

Can any KM-GBF indicators be used to monitor OH actions?

One Health working group

204 indicators

?

14

LIVING DATA 2025

15 of 32

Can any KM-GBF indicators be used to monitor OH actions?

One Health working group

We evaluated the usability of each indicator for monitoring One Health actions

Two categories:

  • usable (either directly or after adaptation)
  • not usable

?

15

LIVING DATA 2025

16 of 32

One Health Joint Plan Of Action (2022-26)

Action

track 2

Action

track 3

Action

track 4

Action

track 5

Action

track 6

Action

track 1

One Health working group

16

LIVING DATA 2025

17 of 32

One Health Joint Plan Of Action (2022-26)

Action

track 2

Action

track 3

Action

track 4

Action

track 5

Action

track 6

Action

track 1

One Health working group

Enhancing One Health capacities to strengthen health systems

AT1 :

3 actions

17

LIVING DATA 2025

18 of 32

One Health Joint Plan Of Action (2022-26)

Action

track 2

Action

track 3

Action

track 4

Action

track 5

Action

track 6

Action

track 1

One Health working group

Reducing the risks from emerging and re-emerging zoonotic epidemics and pandemics

AT2 :

3 actions

18

LIVING DATA 2025

19 of 32

One Health Joint Plan Of Action (2022-26)

Action

track 2

Action

track 3

Action

track 4

Action

track 5

Action

track 6

Action

track 1

One Health working group

Controlling and eliminating endemic zoonotic, neglected tropical and vector-borne diseases

AT3:

3 actions

19

LIVING DATA 2025

20 of 32

One Health Joint Plan Of Action (2022-26)

Action

track 2

Action

track 3

Action

track 4

Action

track 5

Action

track 6

Action

track 1

One Health working group

Strengthening the assessment, management and communication of food safety risks

AT4 :

3 actions

20

LIVING DATA 2025

21 of 32

One Health Joint Plan Of Action (2022-26)

Action

track 2

Action

track 3

Action

track 4

Action

track 5

Action

track 6

Action

track 1

One Health working group

Curbing the silent pandemic of

Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)

AT5 :

3 actions

21

LIVING DATA 2025

22 of 32

One Health Joint Plan Of Action (2022-26)

Action

track 2

Action

track 3

Action

track 4

Action

track 5

Action

track 6

Action

track 1

One Health working group

Integrating the environment into One Health

AT6 :

4 actions

22

LIVING DATA 2025

23 of 32

Can any KM-GBF indicators be used to monitor OH actions?

One Health working group

204 indicators

?

19 actions in

6 action tracks

23

LIVING DATA 2025

24 of 32

Can any KM-GBF indicators be used to monitor OH actions?

One Health working group

AT1

Health systems

AT2

Epidemics and pandemics

AT3

Endemic diseases

AT4

Food safety risks

AT5

Antimicrobial resistance

AT6

Environmental health

0

50

100

150

200

KM-GBF

indicators

53%

51%

33%

55%

20%

79%

24

LIVING DATA 2025

25 of 32

Can any KM-GBF indicators be used to monitor OH actions?

One Health working group

AT1

AT2

AT3

AT4

AT5

AT6

0

25

50

75

100

125

Headline indicators

Headline

KM-GBF

indicators

100% are usable (27/27)

25

LIVING DATA 2025

26 of 32

Can any KM-GBF indicators be used to monitor OH actions?

One Health working group

AT1

AT2

AT3

AT4

AT5

AT6

0

25

50

75

100

125

Binary indicators

Headline

Binary

KM-GBF

indicators

93% are usable (14/15)

26

LIVING DATA 2025

27 of 32

Can any KM-GBF indicators be used to monitor OH actions?

One Health working group

AT1

AT2

AT3

AT4

AT5

AT6

0

25

50

75

100

125

Component indicators

Binary

Component

Headline

KM-GBF

indicators

94% are usable (49/52)

27

LIVING DATA 2025

28 of 32

Can any KM-GBF indicators be used to monitor OH actions?

One Health working group

AT1

AT2

AT3

AT4

AT5

AT6

0

25

50

75

100

125

Complementary indicators

Component

Complementary

Binary

Headline

KM-GBF

indicators

87% are usable (96/110)

28

LIVING DATA 2025

29 of 32

Main objective

One Health working group

Can we reuse existing indicators for monitoring One Health actions?

biodiversity

Yes!*

*but KM-GBF indicators don’t equitably cover all action tracks, and most important indicators for OH are currently optional

29

LIVING DATA 2025

30 of 32

One Health is based on collaboration

One Health working group

GIF found on GIPHY

30

LIVING DATA 2025

31 of 32

One Health is based on collaboration

One Health working group

GIF found on GIPHY

31

LIVING DATA 2025

32 of 32

Thank you! Questions?

indicators linked to Health

indicators

Action tracks

francis.banville@umontreal.ca

One Health working group

https://francisbanville.github.io/

32

LIVING DATA 2025