1 of 16

“SCRUTINIZE, RIP IT APART, REBUILD IT, REIMAGINE”: CENTERING CULTURAL CRITICISM AND SOCIAL JUSTICE IN DH PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

Tarika Sankar

December 1, 2021

2 of 16

About me

  • PhD candidate in English literature at the University of Miami
  • Mellon/ACLS Dissertation Completion Fellow
  • Dissertation title: Beyond the Culture Concept: Indo-Caribbean Identity as Diasporic Consciousness
  • Graduate Research Assistant at the WhatEvery1Says project from 2017-2020; UM project manager from 2017-2018
  • Digital Humanities Research Institute (DHRI) Community Leader, 2021-22 cohort

3 of 16

Incorporating DEI into the project lifecycle

[]

4 of 16

1. PROJECT CHARTER

5 of 16

Define Project Goals

Community involvement

  • What communities are implicated in this research?
  • How can or should the communities implicated in this research be involved?

https://we1s.ucsb.edu/wp-content/uploads/KF-8-2.pdf

6 of 16

Determine Roles and Responsibilities�Define project team & establish meetings

Labor Practices

  • What labor practices are being used in the creation of the project? (e.g. undergraduate labor)
  • How do we ensure that all labor is being fairly compensated and credited?
  • Does our labor structure reproduce or rethink power hierarchies within higher education?

https://humtech.ucla.edu/news/a-student-collaborators-bill-of-rights/

7 of 16

2.PLAN

8 of 16

Determine Data and/or Content Needs

Data ethics (raw data is an oxymoron)

  • What is missing from the dataset or textual corpora? Are there any exclusions or absences, intentional or unintentional?
    • Can we productively probe those absences?
  • Who will get access to this data? Is there any potential that it could be used against this community in the future?
  • What CAN the data show and represent? What can it NOT tell us?

9 of 16

3. BUILD

10 of 16

Sketch, Design for Accessibility, Prototype

Tools and methods (all models are wrong, some models are useful)

  • What are the histories and contexts of the tools (especially proprietary) and platforms I am using?
    • Is there an open-source alternative?
  • What assumptions are embedded in the methods or models I am using?

11 of 16

4. REVIEW

12 of 16

Evaluate, Reflect, Revise

All maps are arguments, all archives are rhetorical

  • What argument is this archive, collection or map making?

https://library.brown.edu/cds/slaveryandjustice/

13 of 16

5. SHARE

14 of 16

Disseminate to audience, assess, preserve

Transparency (process as product)

  • How can we make the data curation decisions, choices, and methodology transparent to our audience?

15 of 16

Growing workshop and curricular offerings

  • Finding and Managing Data on Marginalized Communities
  • Data Ethics: Considerations for data on historically marginalized populations
  • DH Fundamentals: Command Line, Markdown, and HTML (English and Spanish)

16 of 16

Thank you! Questions?