1 of 43

Photosensors

Noah Hood, Kaixuan Ni

2 of 43

Outline

  • Photomultiplier Tubes (PMTs)*
  • Avalanche Photodiodes (APDs)*
  • Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPMs)*
  • Applications of photosensors

* Based on book: Particle Detectors: Fundamentals and Applications by Hermann Kolanoski and Norbert Wermes, 2020.

3 of 43

Introduction

  • Particle detectors play a crucial role in studying fundamental particles and their interactions.
  • Photosensors are essential components of particle detectors, converting light into electrical signals.

4 of 43

Photosensors used in the Summer School

  • Scintillator/SiPM Lab
  • Liquid Argon Lab
  • Inorganic Scintillator Lab

5 of 43

Photomultiplier Tubes (PMT)

  • PMTs are vacuum-based devices with high gain and excellent timing resolution.
  • They consist of a photocathode, dynodes, and an anode.
  • PMTs are widely used in experiments requiring high sensitivity and single-photon detection.

6 of 43

PMT Window

  • borosilicate glass most common largely due to price
  • transmission cuts off at 300nm

MgF2

115 nm

sapphire

140 nm

synthetic silica (fused quartz)

∼ 150 nm

UV-borosilicate

∼ 185 nm

7 of 43

Photoelectric Effect

  • Photon with energy greater than the work function ionizes an electron
  • 3 steps for emission in cathodes (Spicer Model)
    • Photon is absorbed and kinetic energy transferred to an electron,
    • The electron travels to the surface of the material,
    • The electron escapes from the surface of the cathode into the vacuum.
  • Quantum efficiency, function of the three steps:

8 of 43

Quantum Efficiency

  • Metals - High reflectance, lots of electrons in valence band, high work function, generally not ideal
  • Usually compound semiconductors are used
  • Can coat surface with electropositive material (e.g. Cs), leaves positive ions on surface, effectively decrease vacuum energy/work function

9 of 43

Photocathode

  • Monoalkali (e.g. Cs–I, Cs–Te, K–Br, Sb–Cs3)
  • Bialkali (e.g. Sb–Rb–Cs3)
  • Multialkali materials, (e.g. Sb–Na–K–Cs3)
  • Less frequently III–V semiconductors, ‘activated’ (doped) with caesium, like GaAs(Cs), GaP(Cs), or InGaAs(Cs).

10 of 43

Photocathode

  • Monoalkali sensitive to UV and VUV (solar blind)
  • Bialkali and multialkali have higher QE (up to infrared sensitivity)
  • Expense of higher noise because longer wavelengths → smaller energy level gaps → possibility of thermal emission

11 of 43

Electron Multiplier

  • Dynodes + Anode
  • Linearly focusing
    • Highest gain/linearity
  • “Venetian Blinds”
    • Optimal shape for tube
    • Allows large cathode
    • Small afterpulsing
  • Both are very sensitive to external magnetic fields – can be mitigated by mu-metal housing (high permeability, redirects mag fields)

12 of 43

Voltage Divider – Base

  • Voltage of dynodes is controlled through a series of resistors
  • Choose resistances to balance load vs. stable potentials on dynodes
  • Capacitors help control effect of large currents on final dynodes

13 of 43

Efficiency

  • Can also define radiant sensitivity similar to efficiency

  • Note relatively low efficiency, at most ~ 40% for PMTs

Dashed line without UV transparent window

14 of 43

Single PE resolution

arXiv:1202.2628

R11410-10 (used in XENON1T/nT/LZ/PandaX)

XENON100, R8520

arXiv:1107.2155

Peak/valley: 1.54

15 of 43

PMT Summary

  • high gain (~ 10^6),
  • very low noise,
  • single photon detection capability,
  • small quantum efficiency by comparison (typically about 25%),
  • good time resolution in the order of 200 ps,
  • commercially available in many variants for a range of application scenarios,
  • difficult to handle regarding size and shape in comparison to alternatives (e.g. photodiodes).

Super-Kamiokande

16 of 43

Other Similar Detectors

Microchannel Plate

  • Channels coated with photocathode material
  • More position resolution, lower gain

Vacuum Phototriode (VPT)

  • Useful when strong magnetic fields present
  • Photoelectrons pass through anode first, some are returned, smaller multiplication

17 of 43

Photodiodes

  • APDs are semiconductor-based devices that provide gain through avalanche multiplication.
  • They offer moderate gain and sensitivity, and are often used in applications with low-light levels.
  • Work using internal photoeffect, i.e. valence electrons are excited to conduction band instead of vacuum
  • Can be made much smaller than PMTs at the expense of amplification

18 of 43

Photodiodes

  • PIN photodiode is most common
  • Undoped region is placed between p- and n- doped regions
  • Reverse bias voltage applied, field extends into intrinsic region

19 of 43

Efficiency

  • Much higher than for PMTs, ~70% for photodiodes
  • Lower time resolution (~2 ns compared to ∼200 ps for PMTs)
  • No intrinsic amplification → harder for low intensity applications
  • Most of the noise depends on amplification

For comparison, a typical emission spectrum of a CsI (Tl) scintillation crystal (dotted line and right-hand y-axis).

20 of 43

Avalanche Photodiodes (APD)

  • Add an additional “metallurgical junction” (strong p and n doping)
  • This creates a stronger field which creates more e/h pairs
  • N region much bigger than metallurgical region
  • “reach through” photons travel through strongly n-doped (450nm to 1000nm, absorption depths from 1μm to 1 mm)
  • For sensitivity to lower wavelengths, can go through p+ side

21 of 43

Noise in APDs

  • Avalanche creates its own ‘excess noise’ originating from the statistical fluctuations in the avalanche amplification process,

  • Surface leakage current unaffected, bulk current multiplied by gain and excess noise.
  • APDs can perform better than photodiodes for low intensity

22 of 43

Hybrid Detectors

  • Good for high magnetic field setups
  • Various possibilities:
    • Exchange dynode system for an (A)PD
    • Grids of APDs (pixel)

23 of 43

G-APD

  • Best for detecting single photons due to high gain
  • Good time resolution (<1ns)
  • Lose energy resolution in geiger mode
  • Often arranged as pixel detectors

24 of 43

Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM)

  • SiPMs are solid-state devices with high photon detection efficiency and compact size.
  • Despite the name, this is an APD
  • operated in (limited) Geiger mode at an amplification gain of about 10^6
  • In this mode each APD cell is a binary (yes/no) operating photodetector
  • The pixel cells are small with typical dimensions in the range 15–70 μm
  • SiPMs are suitable for applications that demand high photon counting capability and low power consumptions

25 of 43

SiPM Design

  • Wavelength affects penetration depth
  • E- drifted to amplification zone
  • Resistors between cells to decouple/quench current from avalanche
  • Rise time ~0.5 ns from avalanche
  • Decay time 30-100 ns from quench

26 of 43

Dark Pulses

  • Leakage current, highly temperature and gain dependent
  • After-pulsing’: delayed pulses created by charge carriers trapped during the avalanche amplification – released after a characteristic trapping time of typically some hundred nanoseconds, thereby initiating new avalanches.
  • Optical cross talk: These are photons created during the amplification process reaching across boundaries into a neighbour SiPM cell where they initiate another avalanche.

27 of 43

Analog SiPM

  • All cells are joined to a single output node
  • Max intensity
  • Beyond this, lose linearity as multiple photons can hit a single cell

28 of 43

Digital SiPM

  • Each cell is read individually
  • MOS transistor circuits replace the passive quench resistors
  • Allows for disabling individual noisy cells
  • Could increase possible cross-talk
  • First developed for high intensity, but can also detect single photons
  • QE slightly smaller than analog due to transistors and other metals absorbing some photons
  • Digital readout simplifies design of the readout electronics

29 of 43

Comparison

30 of 43

Applications of photosensors

  • Photosensors are used in various particle physics experiments, including:
    • High-energy physics experiments such as colliders (e.g., Large Hadron Collider).
    • Neutrino detectors (e.g., neutrino oscillation experiments) and dark matter detectors.
    • Cosmic ray detection and astroparticle physics experiments.
    • Medical imaging applications like positron emission tomography (PET).

31 of 43

Photosensors for low-background noble liquid experiments

  • Noble liquids (liquid argon, liquid xenon) are widely used in dark matter and neutrino experiments (lectures by Pedro Ochoa & Aaron Manalaysay)
  • Choice of photosensors play a critical role in the detector design and sensitivity
  • In addition to the photon detection efficiency or QE, considerations also on dark noises, power consumption, background radioactivity etc.

?

SiO2

Alexander Neumeier: Optical Properties of Liquid Noble Gas Scintillators, TUM PhD thesis

32 of 43

Photon detection in nEXO

  • Energy resolution dominated by light
    • Need 3% efficiency of detecting scintillation photons for 1 % energy resolution
    • With negligible noise for light detection
  • Need at least 4 m2 of detection area
  • Need reflective electrodes
  • Need low radioactivity

32

Fabrice Retiere , June 8, 2023, XeSAT2023

33 of 43

SiPMs, baseline photo-detector solution for nEXO

  • High gain (low noise)
  • Large manufacturing capabilities
  • But efficiency and radioactivity need work

33

1.3x1.3 mm2 T2K Multi-Pixel Photon counter

Pictures courtesy of Kyoto University

2mm

50μm

p-substrat

n-well

n+

p-

p+

Cathode

Anode

Photons

Discovery,

accelerated

34 of 43

Two SiPM options for nEXO (baseline)

  • Fondazione Bruno Kessler
    • Development chain driven by nEXO:
      • VUV-HD1
      • VUV-HD2, 1x1cm2, did not work
      • VUV-HD3, 6x6mm2, good performances
      • VUV-HD4, 2022-2023, 1x1cm2, does not seem to work well
  • Hamamatsu
    • VUV4 Multi-Pixel Photon Counter
    • Single 6x6mm2. Appears to have worse performance
    • Quad 2x2 6x6mm2
    • 1x1cm2 integrated on nEXO tile

34

June 8, 2023

Technology decision in 2024

Discovery,

accelerated

35 of 43

SiPM for lowest radioactivity content

35

238U

232Th

40K

Prelim. nEXO requirements for 4m2

< 0.1 nBq/cm2

<1 nBq/cm2

< 10 nBq/cm2

FBK SiPM (bare wafers) A

<0.4 nBq/cm2

~0.6 nBq/cm2

~3 nBq/cm2

SensL SiPM (packaged) B

<1.1 mBq/cm2

<33 μBq/cm2

<69 μBq/cm2

Hamamatsu PMT R11410-21 c

<0.4 mBq/cm2

0.016 mBq/cm2

0.37 mBq/cm2

A Counting at U.Alabama after nuclear activation at MIT

b NEXT Ge counting. http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1433

C E. Aprile et al. Material radioassay and selection for the XENON1T dark matter experiment. Eur. Phys. J., C77(12):890, 2017, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.01828.pdf

Discovery,

accelerated

36 of 43

Hamamatsu Low RI MPPCs

37 of 43

SiPM nuisances

  • Dark noise
    • Thermal. At room temperature ~100kHz/mm2
  • Carrier trap and release => after-pulsing
  • Light emission during avalanche
    • Direct cross-talk
    • Delayed cross-talk
    • External cross-talk, aka hit another SiPM
  • Large capacitance ~50pF/mm2

37

External cross-talk

Discovery,

accelerated

38 of 43

Correlated avalanches

38

FBK

Dominated by cross-talk (prompt additional avalanche)

Hamamatsu

Dominated by after-pulsing

Significant batch to batch variation

Gallina, G., Guan, Y., Retiere, F. et al. Performance of novel VUV-sensitive Silicon Photo-Multipliers for nEXO. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1125 (2022), https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.07765.pdf

Discovery,

accelerated

39 of 43

Photo-detector performance comparison

39

Parameters at LXe temperature for cm2 scale channel size

PMT R11410-21a

FBK VUV-HD3 @ 3V b

HPK VUV4 MPPC @ 3V b

Single channel active area

128 cm2 (?)

25 cm2 c

6 cm2 d

Efficiency at 175nm

34%

24.4 ± 1.4%

20.5 ± 1.1%

Single avalanche charge resolution

25%

5%c

5%d

Dark noise rate (Hz/cm2)

1.3 ± 0.4

19 ± 1

35 ± 1

# correlated avalanche in 1 μs

0.02 ± 0.005

0.23 ± 0.06

0.06 ± 0.02

# Photons emitted per avalanche

N/A

1 ± 0.5

1 ± 0.5

Single photon timing resolution, σ

3.9 ± 0.6ns

~10 nsc

~100 nsd

Radiopurity per active area

~mBq/cm2

Medium c

< 10 nBq/cm2 d

Power consumption in LXe

0.75 mW/cm2

2 mW/cm2 c

2 mW/cm2 d

a Massaged from P. Barrow et al., https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.01654.pdf

b G.Gallina et al., https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.07765.pdf

c DarkSide-20k readout scheme for 25 cm2 channel size

d nEXO readout scheme for 6 cm2 channel size (can be applied to FBK)

Discovery,

accelerated

40 of 43

Motivation: higher performances, lower power, simpler

40

~0.1nF/mm2

Analog to Digital

Conversion

Comparator (more power)

Waveform digitizer

Amplifier

Need power

to buffer

capacitance

Photon search engine

In software or firmware

Photon time stamp

Timing performance

Limited by size

Large pulse very messy

AQ

Active

Quench

Digital processing

Photon time stamp

Photon

Photon

Tag for every photon

Or some simpler aggregate

Bias

Bias

Transition for analog to digital SiPM (non nEXO baseline)

Discovery,

accelerated

41 of 43

Photon to Digital Converter

  • Designed by Sherbrooke (Canada) and built at Teledyne-DALSA (Canada)
  • The good
    • Can optimize sensor and readout separately
    • Excellent fill factor – possibly 100% in back-side configuration
  • The bad
    • Tricky to build

41

June 8, 2023

Discovery,

accelerated

42 of 43

Photon to Digital Converter – complete system

42

Discovery,

accelerated

43 of 43

Current development state

43

FPGA-based Controller

45 mm

TOP

BOT

57 mm

ASIC-based Controller

Discovery,

accelerated