1 of 37

Robust Research

A practical guide

Verena Heise

Meta-Psychology Symposium

7 June 2018

2 of 37

What can I do?

3 of 37

Open Science

4 of 37

Open Science

5 of 37

Open Data

Neuroimaging:

6 of 37

Open Data

7 of 37

Open Science

8 of 37

Open Materials

  • Publish the analysis scripts (ALL of them and make them readable ☺)
  • Describe (and share) experimental setups, equipment, etc.

9 of 37

Open Science

10 of 37

Open Science

Open Reporting

11 of 37

Open Reporting

  • Publish ALL the analyses you did (pre-registered and exploratory)
  • Publish ALL results (not just “significant” ones)
  • Publish according to best practice guidelines

12 of 37

Best practice guidelines

13 of 37

Open Reporting

  • Publish ALL the analyses you did (pre-registered and exploratory)
  • Publish ALL results (not just “significant” ones)
  • Publish according to best practice guidelines
  • Use preprints
  • Publish Open Access

14 of 37

Good Scientific Practice

15 of 37

Ask the right question

16 of 37

Good Scientific Practice

17 of 37

Do you need to collect new data?

18 of 37

Design your study properly

19 of 37

Statistical power

20 of 37

Sample size calculators

21 of 37

  • Effect size = Cohen’s d of 0.5 (medium effect)
  • Statistical power to find effect = 90%
  • alpha = 0.05
  • One sample one-tailed t test
  • 36 participants
  • Independent groups two-tailed t test
  • 86 participants per group

Sample size calculation - example

22 of 37

Reproducible workflows

23 of 37

Reproducible measures

  • Validity (Can I get the right answer?)
  • Reliability (Can I get the same answer twice?)

Reliable

Not Valid

Valid

Not reliable

Not reliable

Not valid

Both reliable and valid

24 of 37

Reproducible measures

  • How reliable and valid are your tests?
    • Can you compare with gold standard or well-established tests?
  • Are you doing any quality control of your tools (experimental setup, acquired data, etc.)
  • Analysis pipelines
    • Use well-established tools
    • Follow good programming practice
      • Test your code using simulations

25 of 37

Robust Research - summary

  • Open Science
    • Data
    • Materials
    • Reporting (and pre-registration)
  • Good Scientific Practice
    • Relevant research question
    • Statistical power
    • Reproducible workflows
    • Reproducible measures (validity, reliability, QC procedures)

26 of 37

27 of 37

What can we do?

28 of 37

The Oxford experience

  • Started Robust Research Initiative in September 2017
  • Mainly early career researchers
  • Disciplines: experimental psychology, biomedical sciences (preclinical to clinical), social sciences (archaeology, anthropology, economics), bioethics

29 of 37

Robust Research

Research

Ethics

Infrastructure

Collaborative research

Helpdesks

Quality control

Innovation

Education

Undergraduate/ Graduate

Postdocs/ staff/ PIs

External training

Incentives

Metrics

Hiring/ promotion criteria

Award system

Policy

Funders

Publishers

National/ International networks

Government

30 of 37

Education

  • Journal clubs
  • Seminar series
  • Workshops
  • Summer school in collaboration with Berlin: https://www.bihealth.org/de/aktuell/berlin-oxford-summer-school/
  • Provide speakers for lab meetings
  • Undergraduate teaching
  • Lecture series/ workshops for taught MSc programmes
  • Doctoral training centres
  • Skills training for medical sciences division

31 of 37

Why do we care?

32 of 37

Open Science

33 of 37

Translation

34 of 37

Ethics

35 of 37

Trust in evidence

36 of 37

37 of 37

Questions or comments?

verena.heise@ndph.ox.ac.uk