Development of Psychometric simplified System for behavioral Pattern Study of Indigenous Tribes of South Gujarat
Components
1) Introduction
2) Different people
3) Derived Data(Static and Dynamic)
4) Simplified Metric
5) Influential Factors
6) Case Study
Introduction
Indigenous Tribes of Gujarat
Population – 89.17 lakhs
Percentage of states’ population – 14.75%
Concentration – 14 Districts,48 talukas,4 clusters
Geographical area – 18%
Literacy Rate – 62.5%
Data Structure
DATA | POSSIBLE VALUES | |
| True(1) | False(0) |
RELIGION | Follower | Non follower |
SOCIAL | Direct | Indirect |
POLITICAL | Member | Independent |
Preliminary Metric
Secondary Metric
DOMAIN | POSSIBLE VALUES(1-2-3-4) |
SOCIAL |
|
ORGANIZATIONAL |
|
INTELLECTUAL |
|
EMOTIONAL |
|
PERCEPTUAL |
|
| Intensity Level | ||||
Domain | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Social(Extroversion) | Introvert | Assertive | Impulsive | Intolerant | |
Organizational | Hostile | Monitoring | Trustful | Hardcore/Obsessive | |
Intellectual | Confirmative | Observing | Open to Experience | Divergent Thinker | |
Emotional | Anxious | Stable | Tough-Minded | Objective Thinker | |
Perceptual | Changeable | Dependable | Willing | Enduring | |
Characteristic/Traits in different domains for tribes:
Case Study: Par Tapi River Link Project
Project Investment: 100 billion rupees vs Protest Expenditure: 3 million rupees
Use of Data: Static Data
Non availability of expert data analysts and sophisticated dats
Massive level and perfectly planned use of Stimulation process for emotional appealing rather than modern audience targeting approach
Scenario conclusion: Subjective Experience >>>>>>>>>>> Objective Thinking
Relative to: Mammoth hunted down by Arrow