1 of 15

Constraints on the Production of Nitric Oxide by Lightning as Inferred from Satellite Observations

​

​

Randall Martin

Dalhousie University

With contributions from

Bastien Sauvage & Ian Folkins: Dalhousie Univeristy

Christopher Sioris: University of Saskatchewan

Christopher Boone and Peter Bernath: University of Waterloo

Jerry Ziemke: NASA Goddard

2 of 15

Global Lightning NOx Source Remains Uncertain�Constrain with Top-down Satellite Observations

SCIAMACHY

Tropospheric NO2 Columns

ACE-FTS

Limb HNO3 Measurements in the Upper Troposphere

OMI & MLS

Both instruments onboard Aura satellite

Tropospheric O3

3 of 15

Current Estimate of Annual Global NOx Sources�As Used In GEOS-Chem

1010 molecules N cm-2 s-1

Lightning

Global: 6.0 Tg N yr-1

Tropics: 4.4 Tg N yr-1

Other NOx sources: (fossil fuel, biofuel, biomass burning, soils)

39 Tg N yr-1

4 of 15

Tropospheric NO2 Columns Retrieved from SCIAMACHY

Retrieval Uncertainty

±(5x1014 molec cm-2 + 30%)

Tropospheric NO2 (1015 molecules cm-2)

Nov - Apr

May - Oct

NO/NO2 ↑ ↑

w Altitude

Data from Martin et al., 2006

5 of 15

Simplified Chemistry of Nitrogen Oxides�Exploit Longer Lifetimes in Upper Troposphere �

NO

NO2

NOx lifetime < day

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Boundary

Layer

NO/NO2 ↑ ↑

with altitude

hv

NO

NO2

O3, RO2

hv

HNO3

NOx lifetime ~ week

lifetime ~ weeks

Ozone (O3)

lifetime ~ month

Upper Troposphere

Ozone (O3)

lifetime ~ days

HNO3

O3, RO2

6 of 15

Strategy

1) Use GEOS-Chem model to identify species, regions, and time periods dominated by the effects of lightning NOx production

​

​

2) Constrain lightning NOx source by interpreting satellite observations in those regions and time periods

​

7 of 15

Simulated Monthly Contribution of Lightning, Soils, and Biomass Burning to NO2 Column

8 of 15

Annual Mean NO2 Column at Locations & Months with >60% from Lightning, <25% from Surface Sources

Tropospheric NO2 (1014 molec cm-2)

Meridional Average

SCIAMACHY (Uses 15% of Tropical Observations)

GEOS-Chem with Lightning (8% bias, r=0.75)

GEOS-Chem without Lightning (-60% bias)

NO2 Retrieval Error ~ 5x1014 molec cm-2

GEOS-Chem with Lightning (6±2 Tg N yr-1)

SCIAMACHY

GEOS-Chem without Lightning

9 of 15

ACE HNO3 over 200-350 hPa for Feb 2004 – Feb 2006

HNO3 Mixing Ratio (pptv)

Data from Boone et al., 2005

10 of 15

GEOS-Chem Calculation of Contribution of Lightning to HNO3

HNO3 from Lightning

Fraction from Lightning

Focus on 200-350 hPa

HNO3 With Lightning (6±2 Tg N yr-1)

No Lightning

Fraction of HNO3 from Lightning

Jan

Jul

11 of 15

Annual Mean HNO3 Over 200-350 hPa at Locations & Months with > 60% of HNO3 from Lightning

Meridional Average

ACE (Uses 83% of Tropical Measurements)

GEOS-Chem with Lightning (-12% bias, r=0.75)

GEOS-Chem without Lightning (-80% bias)

HNO3 Mixing Ratio (pptv)

ACE-FTS

GEOS-Chem with Lightning (6±2 Tg N yr-1)

GEOS-Chem without Lightning

HNO3 Retrieval Error ~35 pptv

12 of 15

OMI/MLS Tropospheric Ozone Column

Jan

Jul

Data from Ziemke et al. (2006)

13 of 15

Calculated Monthly Contribution of Lightning to O3 Column

O3 Column from Lightning

Column Fraction from Lightning

14 of 15

Annual Mean Tropospheric O3 Columns at Locations & Months with > 40% of Column from Lightning

Meridional Average

OMI/MLS (Uses 15% of Tropical Measurements)

GEOS-Chem with Lightning (-1% bias, r=0.85)

GEOS-Chem without Lightning (-45% bias)

Tropospheric O3 (Dobson Units)

OMI/MLS

GEOS-Chem with Lightning (6±2 Tg N yr-1)

GEOS-Chem without Lightning

O3 Retrieval Error < 5 Dobson Units

15 of 15

Conclusions

Global lightning NOx source likely between 4 – 8 Tg N / yr

6 Tg N / yr is a best estimate

​

Further refinement will require

- stronger constraints on midlatitude source

- improved satellite retrieval accuracy (e.g. NO2)

- more observations (e.g. HNO3)

- model development to better represent processes (e.g. lightning NOx representation, vertical transport)

​

Acknowledgements

Supported by NASA’s Radiation Science Program

​