How much pneumatic / hydraulic force does it take to pick up different objects with a robotic hand?
6-2575
6th Grade
Nativity Catholic School
Archdiocese of San Francisco
2024 San Mateo County Office of Education STEM Fair
Abstract
I wanted to do this project because I am interested in robots and I want to be a Mechanical Engineer when I grow up. I am trying to discover the force a robotic hand needs to apply to pick up different objects. The results of my experiment will show scientists how to make a proper mechanical hand by showing them the force needed to pick up common items. The measurement of the force helps them calibrate the strength of the robotic hand. This information will help people make mechanical hands to help people who lost their hands.
My first hypothesis was that for balls of similar weight and different size, the smaller ball will make the piston move up farther which means it would take greater force to pick up. My second hypothesis was that the pistons will need to go up all the way to generate enough force to crack the egg.
For the first experiment, my independent variables were the weight and size of the balls. The dependent variable was the force needed to pick up an object. The control variable was the amount of air and water in each pair of pistons that control each finger and thumb. For my second experiment, the independent variable was the temperature of the eggs. The dependent variable was the force needed to crack an egg between the thumb and finger. Finally, the control variable for the second experiment was the amount of air and water in each pair of pistons that control each finger and thumb.
Abstract
I measured the pneumatic and hydraulic force by measuring how far (in centimeters) the pistons went up. The pneumatic and hydraulic force depends on the movement of the pistons.
In the first experiment, the pistons moved farther as the ball size increased because the thumb and finger moved farther apart. In the second experiment, the finger had to go up higher by adjusting the dial (D), and the finger had to have metal attached to be hard enough to crack the egg. The distance of the finger from the egg also affected the cracking of the egg. As the finger moves farther from the egg, the finger is able to generate more speed at contact with the egg generating greater force. Greater force was needed to crack the colder eggs.
These results provide information on how to program the hand to pick up different size objects and crack eggs depending upon their temperature.
Purpose Statement
I want to do this project because I am interested in robots and I want to be a Mechanical Engineer when I grow up. I am trying to discover the force a robotic hand needs to apply to pick up different objects. The results of my experiment will show scientists how to make a proper mechanical hand by showing them the force needed to pick up common items. The measurement of the force helps them calibrate the strength of the robotic hand. This information will help people make mechanical hands to help people who lost their hands.
Hypothesis
Question #1: If there two balls of different sizes and similar weights, which one would take more force to pick up?
Hypothesis #1: I think the smaller ball will make the piston move up farther which means it would take greater force to pick up.
Question #2: How much force would it take to crack an egg at different temperatures using a robotic hand.
Hypothesis #2: I think the pistons will need to go up all the way to crack the egg.
( The pistons compress the water and air that make the fingers move. )
Experimental Procedures and
Materials
Materials:
Thumb: Pistons TA & B Golf Ball 18 Large Grade A Eggs Ruler w/ 1 mm markings
Finger 1: Pistons 1A & B Baseball Medium Size Bowl Thermometer
Finger 2: Pistons 2A & B Tennis Ball Water Ice
Finger 3: Pistons 2A & B Softball sized whiffle ball plate ¼ measuring cup
D: Dial for range of motion Double Sided Tape Small Piece of Metal
Materials
Experiment #1
Experiment #2
Experimental Procedures and
Materials
Experiment 1:
Experimental Procedures and
Materials
Experiment 2:
Experimental Results - Experiment #1
Ball: | Diameter: | TA : | TB: | 1A: | 1B: |
| (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) |
Golf Ball | 32 | 8 | 27 | 21 | 30 |
Golf Ball | 32 | 15 | 20 | 20 | 25 |
Golf Ball | 32 | 12 | 25 | 20 | 20 |
Tennis Ball | 60 | 11 | 24 | 24 | 26 |
Tennis Ball | 60 | 12 | 26 | 25 | 25 |
Tennis Ball | 60 | 10 | 29 | 21 | 27 |
Baseball | 70 | 11 | 26 | 21 | 25 |
Baseball | 70 | 10 | 26 | 24 | 25 |
Baseball | 70 | 11 | 25 | 24 | 26 |
Whiffle Ball | 90 | 10 | 26 | 25 | 29 |
Whiffle Ball | 90 | 11 | 29 | 25 | 28 |
Whiffle Ball | 90 | 10 | 29 | 25 | 27 |
Experimental Results - Experiment #2
Temperature: | 1A: | 1B: |
(degrees F) | (mm) | (mm) |
67.3 | 20 | 10 |
67.3 | 20 | 9 |
67.3 | 20 | 9 |
44.4 | 20 | 10 |
44.4 | 20 | 10 |
44.4 | 24 | 5 |
127 | 20 | 8 |
127 | 13 | 10 |
127 | 20 | 9 |
Egg diameter | 40 | |
Eggs did not crack by grabbing with fingers. Modifications included adding a metal piece to finger and increasing distance from finger to thumb by adjusting dial (D).
Analysis of Experimental Results - Experiment #1
| | Averages | | | |
Ball: | Diameter: | TA : | TB: | 1A: | 1B: |
| (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) |
Golf Ball | 32 | 11.7 | 24.0 | 20.3 | 25.0 |
Tennis Ball | 60 | 11.0 | 26.3 | 23.3 | 26.0 |
Baseball | 70 | 10.7 | 25.7 | 23.0 | 25.3 |
Whiffle Ball | 90 | 10.3 | 28.0 | 25.0 | 28.0 |
Analysis of Experimental Results - Experiment #2
Distance of stroke helps with cracking the egg. Adjusted yellow nob so finger can go up faster.
| Averages | | |
Temperature: | 1A: | 1B: | Number of Hits |
(degrees F) | (mm) | (mm) | |
127 | 17.7 | 9.0 | 5.7 |
67.3 | 20.0 | 9.3 | 3.0 |
44.4 | 21.3 | 8.3 | 5.7 |
Conclusions
Egg
Finger
Distance from egg
Acknowledgements
Thank you Dad for helping me with this project and taking your free time to help.
Bibliography and
Sources
Authors: Osama A. Gaheen, Ernesto Benini, and Mohamed A. Khalifa�Date: July 25, 2022
Title: Pneumatic Cylinder Speed and Force Control Using Controlled Pulsating Flow.
URL: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098622001227
Authors: Sho Maeda, Nobutaka Tsujiuchi, and Hiroyuki Kojima�Date: January 1, 2012
Title: Development and Control of a Pneumatic Robot Arm for Industrial Fields.
Bibliography and
Sources
Authors: Ajinkya A. Korde, AKshay S. Kolhe�Date: February, 2019
Title: Pneumatic Robot Arm and its Controlling for Automation.
URL: IRJET-V6I2108.pdf
Author: Quincy Compressor�Date: February 12, 2020
Title: How a Pneumatic Robot Arm Works
URL: www.quincycompressor.com/how-a-pneumatic-robot-arm-works/