Improving Practices, Policies and Services for Survivors of Domestic Violence
1
Lucia Corral Peña
Maria Romo
Susan Savage
LaWanda Wesley
ADD CDSS and BSCAF PRESENTERS IN ALPHA ORDER
April 29, 2024
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
2
Disclaimer
The research reported herein was performed with the permission of CDSS. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and should not be considered as representing the policy of the collaborating department, agency or any department or agency of the California government.
Agenda
3
IMPETUS FOR THE PROJECT
4
Audience Poll
5
Understanding the Landscape: �Setting the Context for Domestic Violence Discourse
6
UNDERSTANDING THE LANDSCAPE �
Setting the Context for
Domestic Violence Discourse
7
Setting the Context
8
Disproportionality of Domestic Violence
9
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The goal of this study was to improve practices, policies, and services for survivors of domestic violence in California.
10
Key Stakeholder Listening Sessions
11
36 listening sessions completed
12 sessions with 67 parent survivors
8 sessions with 40 CDSS staff
6 sessions with 44 child care workforce members
4 sessions with 15 direct service providers
6 sessions with 21 statewide agency staff
Parent survivors represented 12 counties
12
Alameda | San Diego |
Contra Costa | San Francisco |
Fresno | San Joaquin |
Los Angeles | San Mateo |
Marin | Shasta |
Monterey | Stanislaus |
Parent Survivor Demographics
13
STUDY RESULTS�Barriers to accessing services
14
Barriers to accessing services for survivors
15
Lack of awareness of available services
Lack of access to services
Lack of empathy from staff
Documentation barriers
Eligibility barriers
Cultural competency barriers
Barrier: Lack of Awareness of Services
Survivors reported
CDSS and other stakeholders reported
Feels siloed. We are so big, touch so many common programs. –CDSS staff
16
Lack of awareness of available services
Barrier: Lack of Access to Services
It's almost like a broken promise when offering our clients services during the pandemic. Knowing that they were very limited in our county being able to provide additional resources. - Agency Staff
17
Lack of access to services
Barrier: Lack of Empathy from Staff
Survivors expressed the need for staff providing services to be more service oriented and have more empathy for survivors. Most reported feeling judged for seeking services.
They look down on you for needing help. - Survivor
18
Lack of empathy from staff
Barrier: Lack of Access Due to Documentation Requirements
…[Having] to prove experiencing DV put me through mental health issues. Very discouraging, stressful. - Survivor
19
Documentation barriers
Barrier: Lack of Access Due to Eligibility
Survivors also expressed the need for clear eligibility guidelines. Many were told they were not eligible for services (e.g., some were denied services because they were still financially tied to their abuser).
[Survivor was told], Must apply for child support to get CalWORKs. Really hard, I didn’t want to be involved with [my] son’s dad, because of DV, [I]struggled with that trying not to be afraid, what if he gets mad that I put him on child support.
- Survivor
20
Eligibility barriers
Barrier: Immigration Status and Language Barriers Exacerbate Challenges
Immigration status and/or English as a secondary language made accessing services more difficult. Many survivors were told that applying for services would negatively affect them when they applied for citizenship. Many documents (and staff language ability) are still primarily in English.
I felt discriminated and rejected because of language. There was a big bad language barrier because not everybody wanted to accept that [I] wasn't able to speak English, and some of these people were uncomfortable even trying to look for an interpreter to assist. - Survivor
21
Cultural competency barriers
RECOMMENDATIONS
22
Recommendations That May Be Low-Cost and Impactful
23
Recommendations That May Require Additional Time or Funding
2. Provide enhanced technical support from CDSS to counties administering CDSS programs about domestic violence survivor rights and program eligibility.
3. Develop videos on how to apply to specific services for survivors of domestic violence.
4. Increase access for CDSS program leaders to data on survivors participating in their programs to ensure equitable services.
24
Recommendations That May Require Additional Time, Funding, or Policy/Statute Change
25
NEXT STEPS AND FUTURE WORK
26
OPEN DISCUSSION
27
Share Out
How do you intentionally identify survivors of domestic violence among those you serve?
What are some challenges you face that we haven’t addressed in the presentation?
What are some ideas to better support survivors?
What resources do you need to better support survivors?
28
Closing: Thank you!��ADD CDSS PRESENTER(S)��Lucia Corral Pena�Blue Shield of California Foundation, Chief Program Director�lucia.corralpena@blueshieldcafoundation.org��Maria Romo�CCRC Government Relations Specialist�mromo@ccrcca.org ��Susan Savage�CCRC Research Director�ssavage@ccrcca.org��LaWanda Wesley�CCRC Director of Government Relations�lwesley@ccrcca.org ��
29
References
1 https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/fastfact.html “Fast Facts: Preventing Intimate Partner Violence.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 11 Oct. 2022, www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/fastfact.html.Accessed July 31, 2023.
2 Thiel, F., Büechl, V.C.S., Rehberg, F., Mojahed, A., Daniels, J.K., Schellong, J., Garthus-Niegel, S. (Apr. 2022) Changes in Prevalence and Severity of Domestic Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Front Psychiatry.
3 "Brain Architecture." Center on the Developing Child: Harvard University, 2024, https://developingchild.harvard.edu/science/key-concepts/brain-architecture/. Accessed January 11, 2024.
4 Institute for Women’s Policy Research. August 14, 2017. “The Economic Cost of Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking.” https://iwpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/B367_Economic-Impacts-of-IPV-08.14.17.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2023.
5 Smith, S.G., Chen, J., Basile, K.C., Gilbert, L.K., Merrick, M.T., Patel, N., Walling, M., & Jain, A. (2017). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010-2012 State Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-StateReportBook.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2023.
6 DuBois, K., Rennison, C. M. & DeKeseredy. W. (Jan. 2019) “Intimate Partner Violence in Small Towns, Dispersed Rural Areas, and Other Locations: Estimates Using a Reconception of Settlement Type.” Rural Sociology, 84 (1), 1-27.
7 James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. (2016). The Report of the 2015 U. S. Transgender Survey, Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality. https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf. Accessed August 8, 2023.
30