1 of 19

Ground Rules

    • Listen actively -- respect others when they are talking.
    • Speak from your own experience instead of generalizing ("I" instead of "they," "we," and "you").
    • Do not be afraid to respectfully challenge one another by asking questions, but refrain from personal attacks -- focus on ideas.
    • Use “I” statements when engaging with your peers.
    • The goal is not to agree -- it is to gain a deeper understanding.
    • Speak freely when you would like to participate, or agree to raise hands in Zoom (decide based on the size of the group).
    • Step up, step up: if you are speaking a lot, step up your listening. If you are listening a lot, step up your speaking.

Ideas for additional ground rules are welcome!

2 of 19

3 of 19

“The geosciences are the least diverse of all STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) fields … the uniformity worsens from undergraduate to graduate to faculty level.”

Figure 1.

4 of 19

“over the 40 years covered by our data, the representation of students from underrepresented minorities (American Indian or Alaska Native, Black or African American, and Hispanic or Latino groups) has essentially been stagnant”

  • From 1976-2016, 86% of PhDs were awarded to students identifying as non-Hispanic White people.�
  • Over those years, no improvement in the representation of students from underrepresented minority groups.�
  • In 2016, only 6% of PhDs went to students from underrepresented minorities.�
  • Underrepresented women of color are especially poorly represented.�
  • By gender, by contrast, there has been much progress, with most of geosciences (except atmospheric sciences) having reached parity by 2016.

5 of 19

Discussion

6 of 19

7 of 19

‘Colourblind Racism’White scientists unintentionally perpetuate racial disparities simply as a result of “obliviousness, not malice” - ie not acknowledging those disparities.

  • “People of colour tend to view race as an important part of their identity, whereas White people tend to view it as incidental.”�
  • “references to race and racism often make people of colour feel seen and heard, whereas White people tend to view such references as unnecessary or even inappropriate”�
  • “most people of colour do not feel comfortable discussing race with White colleagues”�
  • “only 25% of presidents viewed race relations on college campuses overall as good or excellent, 81% of presidents rated race relations on their own campus as good or excellent” … “80% of presidencies and 75% of managerial positions are held by White people”�
  • “profound differences between Black and White adults, with 88% of Black respondents expressing that racial inequality needed to be addressed, compared with only 53% of White respondents”�
  • “STEM and non-STEM faculty, as well as people from the general public, men tended to be more skeptical of gender bias research than women, and this was especially prominent among male STEM faculty”

8 of 19

‘Colourblind Racism’White scientists unintentionally perpetuate racial disparities simply as a result of “obliviousness, not malice” - ie not acknowledging those disparities.

Why is this a problem?

First, many individuals who are privileged by belonging to dominant groups do not feel responsible for the systemic racism in that culture.”

Second, the subject of privileges that White researchers enjoy is an uncomfortable topic as many White people equate it with being implicated in racism, feeling that it challenges their identities as good people.”

Third, when it is the norm to be White, maintaining the comfort of White people becomes part of the unwritten code of a culture, a code that people of colour often follow.”

9 of 19

Suggestions for a path forwardHow to take responsibility at both a personal level and an institute level.

Personal

  • Separate privilege from your identity of yourself as a good person�
  • Take effort to educate yourself about the perspectives of people of color (start by reading)�
  • ask yourself regularly what you are doing to combat racism�
  • talk more about race with your White colleagues

Institute

  • Be aware of affinity bias - when leadership is predominantly white, new hires tend to be, too.�
  • Appoint more people of color to leadership positions.�
  • Prioritize DEI in search and awards committees.

  • Undertake bias trainings; leaders, especially, should set a good example by visibly participating.

10 of 19

Discussion

11 of 19

12 of 19

Very few of the recommendations that various committees and organizations have taken the effort to compile have been invested in.

On average, only 39% are completed.

13 of 19

Some of the Black Student Union (BSU), Black Graduate Student Association (BGSA), and Black Alumni of MIT (BAMIT) recs which have been acted upon …

Taken from the scorecards for individual reports, score of 0.75 or higher.

  • (BSU, BAMIT) Full-time hire with specialization on psychological issues relating to the African Diaspora hired at Mental Health & Counseling
  • (BSU, BGSA) Diversity orientation for incoming students
  • (BSU) Increase financial aid to match peer institutions
  • (BSU) Include DEI questions on Quality of Life and other surveys
  • (BSU) Publicly release breakdowns of survey responses by race, gender, sexuality
  • (BSU) Formal statement from each of MIT’s DLCs affirming commitments to DEI
  • (BGSA) enhance services to students coping with race-based traumatic stress
  • (BAMIT) increase advising efforts for mental well-being of Black students (done through MH&C)
  • (BAMIT) ensure BSU an operating space
  • (BAMIT) include metrics on retention, recruitment, and graduation by race
  • (BAMIT) ask MIT to continue participating in the “Leading for Change” consortium

14 of 19

And some which haven’t.

Taken from the scorecards for individual reports, score of 0.

  • (BSU) Requirements for undergrads to take “immersion studies” courses
  • (BSU) online diversity training for undergrads after 2nd year
  • (BSU) publicly released data by breakdown of identity groups showing why undergrads of color choose not to come to MIT
  • (BSU) creation of Diversity Representative within each department
  • (BGSA) create a 10-year plan to increase the number of Black and URM grad students
  • (BGSA) introduce greater accountability for departmental performance related to matriculation and graduation of URM students
  • (BGSA) require diversity training for incoming grad students
  • (BGSA) require implicit bias training for research personnel - faculty, staff, and students
  • (BGSA) provide tailored resources to help URM students compete on job markets

15 of 19

And some which haven’t. (cont’d)

Taken from the scorecards for individual reports, score of 0.

  • (BAMIT) mentoring and addressing procedural inequities in Black students being unable to secure thesis advisors, UROPS, etc
  • (BAMIT) provide all students with a catalog of faculty from URM groups at the beginning of each semester.
  • (BAMIT) conduct climate surveys specifically among Black students
  • (BAMIT) review academic and research interests and determine how those align with growing minority concerns

Many more recommendations have only been partially or not very meaningfully implemented.

The BGSA, in particular, had very few of their recommendations implemented.

16 of 19

Discussion

17 of 19

Additional slides

18 of 19

MIT’s definition of URM

The federal definition of a minority employee includes all U.S. citizens, both naturalized or permanent residents that have African, Hispanic or Native American heritage. A broader definition of minority group includes Americans and permanent residents of Asian descent, including Southeast Asians and Pacific Islanders. At MIT and most other STEM institutions, the underrepresented minority (URM) refers to those minority groups that are not represented in the STEM fields in numbers proportional to their composition in the U.S. population, which would not include the Asian group. It should be noted that the Initiative team recognizes that although Asians as a group are not underrepresented in the science and engineering fields, Asian women are significantly underrepresented among the ranks of faculty in all fields at MIT. While the focus and scope of this work was on the traditionally underrepresented minorities in science and engineering, it is recommended that attention also be paid to diversity with respect to Asian faculty, in particular Asian women, in future studies on diversity. It is thought that the recommendations of this Initiative will also positively impact numbers of Asian women and other groups with racial, gender or ethnic differences.

Source: Report of the Initiative for Faculty Race and Diversity

http://web.mit.edu/provost/raceinitiative/exec-a.html

19 of 19

Source: Report of the Initiative for Faculty Race and Diversity

http://web.mit.edu/provost/raceinitiative/exec-a.html