1 of 20

BORTH INTEGRATED HEALTH AND CARE COMMUNITY SERVICES

Dr Sue Fish – GP Partner Borth Surgery – Project Lead

Claire Bryant – Advanced Nurse Practitioner and Clinical Care Co-Ordinator

Jacqui Jones Browne – Practice and Project Manager

2 of 20

Project Background

  • Borth and surrounding population
  • Number of multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) working in silos
  • General Practice was not integrated within the MDTs
  • Bureaucratic referral processes
  • Very little patient centred integrated working
  • All parts of the system post pandemic under extreme pressure

BORTH

3 of 20

Borth Integrated Health and Care Community Services Project

  • The Borth Community Interest and Advisory Group for Health and Care was established in April 2021
  • In order to improve the delivery of planned care stakeholder organisations needed to increase their capacity
  • Whole system transformation was required in the delivery of health and care community services through Patient Centred Multi-agency Team (MAT) Working
  • Increased use of Third Sector Services required

4 of 20

Project Approach

  • Clinical Care Co-Ordinator – Band 8A Advanced Nurse Practitioner employed in General Practice
  • Terms of reference agreed for meetings
  • Administrative support for MAT identified
  • Established weekly one hour long MAT meetings
  • Any member of the MAT could discuss any patient registered with Borth Surgery under their care
  • Roll out to second surgery January 2023

5 of 20

Members of the MAT meeting

  • Clinical Care Co-Ordinator (Chair)
  • Administrator (Minute Taker)
  • GP
  • Borth Practice Nurse
  • Community Pharmacist
  • District Nursing Team
  • Community Therapy Representation
  • Community Dietician
  • Older Person’s Mental Health Team
  • Bronglais Hospital Frailty Team

  • Bronglais Hospital Flow Team
  • Palliative Care Team
  • Social Worker/Assistant
  • Reablement
  • Red Cross
  • Community Connector/Carers Service
  • Bronglais Hospital Frailty Team
  • Bronglais Hospital Flow Team
  • Borth Community Hub

6 of 20

Number of Patients Discussed and Referral Source

  • Total Number of Patients 104
    • Patients not in hospital 50

      • Primary Care 9
      • Hospital out-patient referrals 5
      • Palliative Care 12
      • Referrals to Porth Gofal 9
      • Frail elderly in person 11
      • Mental Health 2
      • Cartref Tregerddan 6

    • Patients admitted to hospital 54

7 of 20

�����Feedback from people attending MAT meetings in person:

People listened to what was important to me

I found attending the MAT a very positive experience

It is very reassuring to know that there are so many people and services available to me that I did not know about before the meeting

8 of 20

In Person Mental Wellbeing Scores

�����

9 of 20

Effect on GP Appointments– Frailty

10 of 20

Ceredigion County Council

The Carers and Community Support Team

16 referrals – 15% of patients discussed at MAT

11 of 20

Number of Patients Referred to 3rd Sector

Number Referred

Percentage of Patients Discussed

Number of Patients still engaged

Borth Community Hub

16

15%

12

12 of 20

MAT Member Feedback

13 of 20

�Effect on Length of Stay Borth Surgery

14 of 20

�Effect on Length of Stay Tregaron Surgery

15 of 20

Borth Surgery - Bed Days Saved

Total Number of Bed Days

Total Number of Patients

June 21 – Feb 22

1881

133

June 22 – Feb 23

1328

173

Total number of bed days saved due to reduction in length of stay – 553

16 of 20

������Further Evaluation

  • Planned admissions increased but the average LOS reduced by 37% - saving around 160 bed days

  • The conversion rate of ED attendances increased significantly

  • Of those people who died after contact with MAT – 38% died in hospital

  • Typically 52% of Hywel Dda residents die in hospital

17 of 20

������Resources

Likely reduction in resource usage for IP spells is around £579k (fully absorbed) / £340k (releasable)

Likely increase in ED attendance resource cost is £38k

Project cost £60k

Net overall effect is therefore resource releasing – approx. £250k net benefit

Area

Cost per day / attendance

Fully absorbed cost – BGH general medical bed

£1,094

“Releasable” resource cost – BGH gen medical bed

£640

BGH ED attendance average cost

£314

18 of 20

��

Barriers

  • Culture
  • Bureaucratic referral process
  • Silo working across organisations
  • Resource deficits/service gaps
  • IT systems
  • Funding silos

Enablers

  • Clinical Care Coordinator in Primary care
  • Relationships, trust, ‘can do’ attitude
  • Focus on person-centred care
  • Building on and establishing new networks

Reflections

19 of 20

Conclusions

  • Through multi-agency team working facilitated by a clinical care co-ordinator based in general practice savings can be generated in cost and capacity in secondary care.
  • This increase in capacity will enable more planned care services to be delivered.
  • The benefits from the MAT model appear to be due to improved communication and reduced duplication between agencies.
  • Through increased referral to third sector services there is increased capacity generated in general practice to enable the primary care team to concentrate on patients with more complex care and deliver more planned patient care.
  • There has not been an increase in demand for social services care packages and there may have been a reduction.

20 of 20

Contact Details

Email : Dr Sue Fish sue.fish@wales.nhs.uk

Claire Bryant Claire.M.Bryant@wales.nhs.uk

Jacqui Jones Browne Jacqui.JonesBrowne@wales.nhs.uk

Twitter: @DrSueFish