1 of 21

Property Tax Legislation and Ballot Measures

Colorado School Finance ProjectMay 10, 2024

Greg Sobetski�Chief Economist�Legislative Council Staff

1

2 of 21

Property Tax Basics

  • Assessor determines valuations
    • Most property assessed biennially in odd years
    • Based on market as of June 30 of even years (June 2020, June 2022, June 2024)
  • “Assessed Value” = actual value × assessment rate
  • Tax = assessed value × sum of mill levies
    • Assessment rates set by the state
    • Mill levies set by local governments

  • Ex.: $550,000 home × 7.15% assess. rate × 90 mills = $3,540 tax due

2

3 of 21

Property Tax Landscape Before Session

  • Permanent rates post-Gallagher
    • 7.15% residential; 29% nonresidential; 87.5% oil and gas
  • 2023: significant temporary cuts
    • residential: 6.7% with $55,000 subtraction
    • nonresidential: 27.9% with $30,000 subtraction
    • AV growth of +25%, even with cuts
  • 2024: modest outstanding cuts
    • residential: 6.8% multifamily, 7.06% otherwise, no subtractions
    • no cut to nonresidential
    • AV growth of +7%
  • 2025: no cuts, revert to permanent rate; AV growth of +2%

3

4 of 21

Taxpayer Example

  • Ex.: single-family residence valued at $400k (2021), $550k (2023), 90 mills
  • 2021: $400,000 × 7.15% × 90 mills = $2,574
  • 2022: $400,000 × 6.95% × 90 mills = $2,502
  • 2023: ($550,000 - $55,000) × 6.7% × 90 mills = $2,984
  • 2024 (before session): $550,000 × 7.06% × 90 mills = $3,494
  • 2025 (before session): $550,000 × 7.15% × 90 mills = $3,539

4

5 of 21

Local Share Expectations (before SB 24-233)

Academic Year

Local Share

Growth

2022-23

$3.44 billion

2023-24

$4.18 billion

+21.1%

2024-25

$4.59 billion

+9.9%

2025-26

$4.66 billion

+1.7%

5

6 of 21

Ballot Measures

  • 1 Measure On the Ballot (Initiative #50)
  • 1 Measure Approved for Circulation (Initiative #108)
  • 8 Measures Titled
    • Of which, 3 Appealed to Supreme Court

6

7 of 21

Six Measures to Cut or Limit Property Taxes

  • 2 from Michael Fields and Suzanne Taheri (#50, #108)
  • 1 from Tom Kim and Anneliese Steel (#97)
  • 3 from David Davia and Michael Fields (#296, #298, #300)

  • 4 cut assessment rates (res and nonres) and/or apply subtractions
  • 1 limits growth in statewide tax revenue, unless voters permit revenue to be retained
  • 1 limits growth in assessments

7

8 of 21

Assessment Rates (4 measures)

  • All measures cut rates beginning in PTY 2025. Different permutations:
    • 5.7% res; 24% nonres (#108): ~$800M LS impact; $1.45B backfill to others
    • 5.7% res, with $55,000 subtraction; 25.5% nonres (#298): ~$870M LS impact
    • 5.3% res; 25.5% nonres (#300): ~$860M LS impact
  • One measure includes incremental reductions in assessment rates
    • Annual stepdown of 0.37 pp in res rate, 1.00 pp in nonres rate,�to reach 5.3% res and 24% nonres in 2029 (#296)
      • ~$190M LS impact, but grows quickly (~$390M in FY 2026-27, etc.)

8

9 of 21

Limit on Statewide Property Tax Revenue Growth (#50)

  • Constitutional measure
  • When property tax revenue is projected to grow by at least 4 percent, statewide voter approval is required for local governments to retain and spend the excess
  • Fiscal impact depends on revenue growth rates, voter authorizations

9

10 of 21

Limit on Growth in Assessments (#97)

  • Constitutional limit
  • For 2025 and later assessments:
    • Properties sold since June 2020 are valued at the level of their most recent sale
    • Properties not sold are valued at the level of their PTY 2021 assessment
    • Annual increases are limited to the lesser of inflation or 2.5%, unless the property undergoes substantial improvement
  • Estimated to reduce property taxes by $2.3 billion for PTY 2025, larger amounts in later years
  • LS impact: ~$740M

10

11 of 21

Four Measures to Limit the Impact of Property Tax Limits

  • All four from Scott Wasserman and Ed Ramey

  • 1 conditionally imposes tax on “luxury” residential property
  • 1 conditionally increases the nonres rate for most nonresidential property
  • 1 conditionally allows the state to retain and spend revenue for reimbursements
  • 1 requires local voter approval in order for a statewide limit on property tax to apply locally

11

12 of 21

“Luxury” Residential Property Tax (#96)

  • Constitutional measure
  • If a statewide limit on the amount of or growth in property tax revenue is imposed, a supplemental tax is imposed beginning in 2027 to offset revenue loss that would otherwise occur:
    • Applies to single family residential worth at least $2 million
  • Fiscal impact uncertain, would depend on what limit, if any, is imposed

12

13 of 21

Nonresidential Assessment Rate (#269)

  • Begins in PTY 2026
  • If local share of total program funding for school finance is less than 50%, increases nonres rate to 32%
    • Increased rate does not apply to property being used by businesses that meet SBA definition of “small business”
  • Expected to trigger under current law
  • Estimated to increase property tax revenue by $300 million in PTY 2026 and decrease the state share school finance obligation by $100 million

13

14 of 21

Retain Revenue for Reimbursement (#261)

  • Begins in 2025
  • If a statewide limit on the amount of or growth in property tax revenue is imposed, authorizes state to retain revenue over the Referendum C cap to reimburse local governments for their lost revenue.
  • Fiscal impact uncertain, would depend on what limit, if any, is imposed

14

15 of 21

Local Voter Approval for Application of Limit (#95)

  • Constitutional measure
  • If a statewide limit on the amount of or growth in property tax revenue is imposed, requires local voter authorization for limit to apply locally.
  • Fiscal impact uncertain, would depend on what limit, if any, is imposed

15

16 of 21

Senate Bill 24-233

  • Bipartisan sponsorship (Sens. Hansen, Kirkmeyer; Reps. deGruy Kennedy, Frizell)
  • Cuts property taxes in 2024 and all future years
  • 2024: extends 2023 cuts
    • Residential: 6.7% with $55,000 subtraction
    • Nonresidential: 27.9% with $30,000 subtraction
  • LS impact: $379 million, appropriated from SEF

16

17 of 21

Senate Bill 24-233

  • 2025 and later years:
    • Applies nonresidential cuts universally
    • Applies residential cuts only to non-school districts
  • Improved commercial and agricultural property:
    • 2024: 27.9%
    • 2025: 27.0% (LS impact ~$75M)
    • 2026: 25.0% (LS impact ~$150M)
  • No changes to other nonresidential property

17

18 of 21

Senate Bill 24-233

  • Residential property (non-schools):
    • 2024: 6.7% with $55,000 subtraction
    • 2025: 6.4%
    • 2026 and ongoing: 6.95% with a 10% subtraction, up to $70,000
  • Residential property (school districts):
    • 2024: 6.7% with $55,000 subtraction
    • 2025 and ongoing: 7.15%
  • Trigger: if LS ≥ 60%, then residential rate subsequently adjusted annually to target LS = 60%

18

19 of 21

Senate Bill 24-233 – other provisions

  • Property tax revenue limit:
    • Does not apply to school districts
    • Property tax growth limited to 5.5% annually, lots of exceptions
  • Expands property tax deferral program
  • Bill does not take effect if property tax reductions or limits pass at the November election

19

20 of 21

Interaction with HB 24-1448 phase-in

  • HB 24-1448 pauses implementation if:
    • Assessment (odd-numbered) year: LS growth < (inflation – 2%)
    • Non-assessment (even-numbered) year: LS growth < -2%
    • SEF transfer growth < -5%
  • Not expected to trigger under SB 24-233
    • If anything, makes pause less likely in FY 2025-26
  • Would trigger under any of the ballot measures that cut assessment rates

20

21 of 21

Questions?

Greg Sobetski

Chief Economist | Legislative Council Staff

Greg.Sobetski@coleg.gov | 303-866-4105

21