Supporting Teachers who Support Student Transition

Transnational Meeting 22

​

16 May 2025

1. Final report - responses to the contents-related questions

a. all together [10 questions: 29, 31, 33, 32, 25, 26, 22, 23, 24, 4]

b. in pairs/by institution [5 questions: 3, 5, 9, 14, 26; + Marigel - Joint ME report]

​

​

• Final report financial part [bilateral basis]
1. reporting on Year 3 Multiplier Events
2. Timesheets
3. Any adjustments (planned vs actual budget distribution/use)

​

EDIW: 2(a)b-c; UCD: 2a-c ; UL: 2(a)b-c; UPM: (a)b-c; UP: (a)b-c

​

• AOB

Agenda

09.30 - 11.30 Working session 1 - Questions we need to discuss together

​

12.00 - 14.00 Working session 2 - Questions we need to discuss together

+ explanation of Qns that require � institutional input

​

15.00 - 17.00 Working session 3 - bilateral revisions

//: work on adding institutional inputs & � revising the parts already drafted

Questions to be discussed together

29. What kind of dissemination activities did your partnership carry out and through which channels? Please also provide information on the feedback received.* [max 3000 signs with spaces]

​

31. How have you ensured that the project's results will remain available and be used by others?* [max 3000 signs with spaces]

​

33. What are the activities and results that will be maintained after the end of the EU funding, and how will you ensure the resources needed to sustain them?* [max 3000 signs with spaces]

Questions to be discussed together

32. How did you see the potential to use this project's approach in other projects on a larger scale and/or in a different field or area?* [max 3000 signs with spaces]

​

25. What was the project's impact on the participants, participating organisations, target groups and other relevant stakeholders?* [max 3000 signs with spaces]

​

26. What was the impact of the project at the local, regional, European and/or international levels? Please provide qualitative and quantitative indicators.* [max 3000 signs with spaces]

Questions to be discussed together

22. Do you consider that the procedures applicable to your project were proportionate and simple?*

​

23. Do you consider that your organisations have developed high-quality practices as a result of their participation in Erasmus+ Key Action 2?*

​

24. Please provide more information about your reply: what type of high-quality practices you developed or did not manage to develop? Why?* [max 3000 signs with spaces]

​

4. Results: What were the concrete outputs and other results of your project?* [OTHER PROJECT OUTCOMES INCLUDE:]