��IEEE International Conference on Robotics, �Automation, Artificial-Intelligence and �Internet-of-Things 2025
Paper ID: 49 || Session: TS - 1 (AIML-1)
A Real-Time Automated Traffic Violations Detection System for Motorcycles Using YOLOR
Authored by:
Sadab Khan Prangon, Rabab Khan Rongon, K Das, F. I Badhon, M.R Momin, A.R Shakur
Presented By:
Sadab Khan Prangon
B.Sc. in Computer Science and Engineering
IUBAT - International University of Business Agriculture and Technology
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Introduction
2
Problem Statement
3
Related Work
Helmet Detection Studies : Afzal et al. (2021)
4
Related Work (Continued)
YOLO Based Approaches: Jamtsho et al. (2021)
5
Related Work (Continued)
Bangla License Plate Recognition: Haque et al. (2022)
6
Objectives
7
Methodology
8
Fig 1. Flowchart of the Proposed Methodology
Dataset
• Locations: Rampura and Khilgaon areas in Dhaka�• Image conditions: Different lighting and weather situations
9
Model Architecture (Continued)
10
Training Setup:
Result (Detection Performance)
• Helmet detection reached 83.92% mAP.�• Triple riding detection has 92.6% accuracy.�• Rider and helmet detection improved steadily across training.
11
Fig 1. Helmet and Rider Detection Performance over Epochs
Table I: Tabulation of Average Precision And IoU Per
Class
Class | Average Precision | Average IoU |
Helmet | 0.84 | 0.78 |
No Helmet | 0.79 | 0.73 |
Triple Riding | 0.93 | 0.87 |
License Plate | 0.68 | 0.66 |
Rider | 0.81 | 0.76 |
Result (License Plate Detection and OCR Performance)
License Plate Detection:
• mAP reached 67.25%�• Accuracy improved across epochs�• Small plate size and occlusion make detection harder
OCR Performance:
• Bengali OCR achieved 85.3 % accuracy�• Preprocessing like resizing and contrast adjustment improved results
12
Fig 2. License Plate Detection and OCR Accuracy Trends
Result (Real Time Performance)
• Helmet detection, rider counting, plate detection and OCR all run with low inference time between 5 ms and 14 ms per task.
• The model maintains strong precision and recall across all tasks, as shown in the bar chart.
• The low latency of each detection step makes the system suitable for real-time use in surveillance video processing.
13
Fig 3. Precision, Recall & Inference Time
Result (Comparison and Robustness)
14
Table II — Comparison of YOLOR vs Other YOLO Models
Table III — Performance Under Noisy Conditions
Model | mAP (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | FPS | Inference Time (ms/frame) |
YOLOv4 | 78.35 | 75.9 | 73.4 | 22 | 45 |
YOLOv5 | 81.47 | 78.2 | 75.8 | 26 | 41 |
PP-YOLOv2 | 82.03 | 79.5 | 76.2 | 29 | 39 |
YOLOR (ours) | 83.92 | 81.2 | 78.4 | 27 | 37 |
Condition | Helmet mAP (%) | License Plate mAP (%) | OCR Accuracy (%) | Inference Time (ms/frame) |
Normal (Baseline) | 83.92 | 67.25 | 85.3 | 37 |
Gaussian Noise (σ=0.05) | 79.85 | 62.14 | 81.7 | 38 |
Low Brightness (-30%) | 78.46 | 60.87 | 79.4 | 39 |
Motion Blur | 80.11 | 61.33 | 80.2 | 39 |
Conclusion
15
Future Work
16
Reference
[1] Afzal, A. Afzal, H. U. Draz, M. Z. Khan, and M. U. G. Khan, "Automatic helmet violation detection of motorcyclists from surveillance videos using deep learning approaches of computer vision," in Proc. Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. (ICAI), 2021, pp. 61–66, doi: 10.1109/ICAI52203.2021.9445283.
[2] Y. Jamtsho, P. Riyamongkol, and R. Waranusast, "Real-time license plate detection for non-helmeted motorcyclist using YOLO," ICT Express, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 166–171, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.icte.2020.07.008.
[3] N. Haque, S. Islam, R. A. Tithy, and M. S. Uddin, “Automatic bangla license plate recognition system for low-resolution images,” in 2022 4th International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 4.0 (STI), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2022
17
Thanks!
Any questions?
18