Introduction
Conclusions
Bharti School of Telecommunication Technology and Management
Industrial Significance
Beamforming at mmWaves for
5G and Beyond Communication Networks
Nancy Varshney and Swades De*
Industry Day Theme #Communication Technologies
References
[1] N. Varshney and S. De, “Optimum Downlink Beamwidth Estimation in mmWave Communications, " IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 544-557, Jan. 2021.
[2] N. Varshney and S. De, “Multi-RF Beamforming-Based Cellular Communication Over Wideband mmWaves," IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 2772-2787, April 2022.
[3] N. Varshney and S. De, “RF Beamforming and Subcarrier Allocation Using Beam Squint in mmWave Systems," IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 678-682, April 2022.
[4] N. Varshney and S. De, “Design Optimization for UAV Aided Sustainable 3D Wireless Communication at mmWaves, " IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Early Access, 2022.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the DST under Grant INT/Korea/P-46, the DoT under Grant 4-23/5Gtest-bed/2017-NT, and the SERB under the Abdul Kalam Technology Innovation National Fellowship.
Figure 5: Proposed versus existing scheme of subcarrier allocation, RF precoding, and baseband precoding in mmWaves.
Figure 10: Illustration of average long-run UE rate as a function of number of sectors and number of RF chains for M=100 UEs.
Figure 16: Improvement in (a) average of long-run UE rate and (b) geometric mean of long-run UE rate achieved using variable frame with TTI=1 OFDM over variable frame but TTI=14 OFDM symbols and over equal frame time for sectors. (M=100)
Figure 9: Normalized interference experienced by a UE with respect to variable half power beamwidth (HPBW).
(a) (b)
Figure 12: Collision probability versus number of new UEs arriving during a sector sojourn time.
Figure 13: Improvement in IAD using proposed initial access procedure over the 3GPP NR.
Figure 14: Saving in RBs using proposed initial access procedure over the 3GPP NR.
Figure 22:: Comparison of the spectral efficiency achieved with the proposed AoA based method over the existing schemes in literature of an aerial RIS-assisted mmWave communication system.
Figure 23: Comparison of the computational complexity of the parameter estimation plus RIS weight optimization of the proposed AoA based approach to that of estimated CSI based approach in an aerial RIS-assisted mmWave communication system.
Figure 17: Aerial RIS-assisted mmWave communication system to serve a UE located on the ground in the shadowed region. (a) Shows using k-means clustering to group and serve UEs. (b) Shows using sectorization method to group and serve UEs.
Figure 3: (a) Pictorial representation of true position X and estimated position X’ of a UE along with the actual beam coverage region considering practical radiation pattern. (b) Demonstration of effective AoA of the UE; Ψ is the true AoA and Ψe is the estimated AoA with respect to sector 2, whereas Ψa is the true AoA of UE with respect to sector 1.
Figure 11: (a) 3GPP NR initial access (IA) procedure; (b) Proposed IA procedure.
Figure 15: Proposed variable time frame structure for single sector in sectored cell model.
Figure 1: (a) and (b) depicts 2-dimensional round-robin scheduling of S=12 sectors over two consecutive epochs with one RF chain (i.e., one analog beam).
Figure 8: (a) and (b) depicts 2-dimensional round-robin scheduling of S=12 sectors over two consecutive epochs with number of RF chains (or beams) NRF= 4. Sectors are represented as {S1,..., S12} and beams are represented as {B1,..., B4}. Here, number of sector served by beam B1 = {S1, S2, S3}. (c) Shows steering directions {R1, ..., R8} of a UE within beam B1.
Figure 18: Plot of gain in geometric mean rate achieved by using k-means clustering over sectoring approach at mmWaves, given power limit power of communication power = 5 W.
Figure 19: Illustration of optimal number of beams as a function of available power for communication module at UAV to serve non-homogeneously distributed UEs on ground at mmWave range
Figure 20: Comparison of achievable geometric mean rate at sub-6 GHz and mmWaves at the UAV as a function of power budget and illustration of backhaul power consumption at sub-6 GHz.
Figure 2: (a) Average long run UE rate as a function number of sectors (inversely proportional to sector HPBW).
(b) Energy efficiency of the system as a function number of sectors.
(c) Trade-off between average long-run UE rate and energy efficiency in estimating optimal sectorization scheme (optimal beamwidth).
Result
Figure 4: Average long-run UE rate versus total number of sectors plot for (a) 1000 UEs uniformly distributed in the cell, and (b) 500 UEs non-uniformly distributed in the cell with probability distribution vector [0.9, 0.05, 0.03, 0.01, 0.008, 0.002].
Figure 7: Gain in spectral efficiency using RF-SC-BB scheme over SC-RF-BB scheme at 28 GHz and 5 GHz.
Result
Result
Result
(a) (b)
Advantages of mmWaves
Research flowchart