1 of 74

Revolutions in Military Affairs

Tools for Understanding the Past

And

Shaping the Future

Matt Caffrey

2 of 74

3 of 74

4 of 74

Division Equivalents - �In Theater May 1940

Germany Allies

Division Eq 137.5 158.5

Ratio 1 1.15

5 of 74

Weapon Systems -� In Theater May 1940

Germany Allies %

Tanks 3,227 4,017 0.80

Combat Aircraft 2,740 2,087 1.31

A/T Guns 12,830 8,882 1.44

AA Guns 8,700 5,203 1.67

Field Guns 15,969 9,727 1.64

Heavy Guns 2,900 4,635 0.63

6 of 74

Tank Comparisons

Pz Kpfw II

CHAR S-35

7 of 74

Aircraft Comparisons

8 of 74

Germany’s�Two Wars With France

World War I World War II

French Allies UK, Belgium UK, Belgium, Holland

German # 11 million 2 1/2 M

Gr KIA 2 million 44 thousand

Duration 50 months 2 months

Outcome Defeat Victory

9 of 74

The Caffrey Cycle �History to Application

History

Theory

Doctrine

Strategy

Execution

10 of 74

Dupuy

11 of 74

Mini Ball -- Maxi Impact

12 of 74

Civil War Casualties�Equivalent to Today's Population

1860 population 32 M - casualties 714,000

1990 population 250 M - casualties 5,500,000

13 of 74

The Innovation Cycle

  • Casualty rates at historical norm
  • New Technology emerges
  • Technology is exploited in weapons, etc..
  • Casualty rates increase
  • New tactics/operations/organizations evolve
  • Casualty rates may increase and or decrease
  • Tactics / operations / organizations mature
  • Casualty rates return to historic norm

14 of 74

15 of 74

Military Technical Revolution

  • Scientific/technical advance
  • Item (weapon, vehicle, comm) that exploits that advance
  • Tactics, operational concept that best employs item.
  • Organization that facilitates tactics/ operational concepts

16 of 74

Impacts of Absolute and Relative MTR Position

Friendly

Enemy

Pre-MTR

Immature

Mature

Pre-MTR

Both at norm

F below norm

E above norm

F very low

E very high

Immature

E below norm

F above norm

Both above norm

F below norm

E above norm

Mature

E very low

F very high

E below norm

F above norm

Both at norm

17 of 74

The Battle of Agincourt

18 of 74

The Battle of Agincourt

19 of 74

The Battle of Agincourt

20 of 74

The Battle of Agincourt

21 of 74

The Battle of Agincourt

22 of 74

The Battle of Agincourt

23 of 74

Castle

24 of 74

Adapting �Castle

25 of 74

Ditch

26 of 74

Ft McHenry

27 of 74

Liberty �Island

28 of 74

December 7, 1941

29 of 74

Early Carrier Operations

30 of 74

The Light Carrier Shoho Prior To Sinking

31 of 74

Why Do Nations Fall Behind in MTRs?

32 of 74

The Cycle �History to Application

History

Theory

Doctrine

Strategy

Execution

33 of 74

The History to Application Cycle

History

Theory

Doctrine

Strategy

Execution

34 of 74

The “Unique” Fallacy

History

Theory

Doctrine

Strategy

Execution

35 of 74

1918; UK World Leader in Tank, Technology, Tactics & Organization

36 of 74

Doctrine is Force Structure

Great Britain

Tank

Battalions

Cavalry

Regiments

1918

48

46

1920

6

42

37 of 74

Horse Flesh vs Blitzkrieg

38 of 74

The Price of Folly

39 of 74

The “End of History” Fallacy

History

Theory

Doctrine

Strategy

Execution

40 of 74

Senior Partner in Victory

41 of 74

Prepared to Fight WWI Better

42 of 74

The Price of Folly

43 of 74

Germany Gets It Right

History

Theory

Doctrine

Strategy

Execution

44 of 74

Germany Gets It Right

History

Theory

Doctrine

Strategy

Wargame

45 of 74

Relative MTR Maturity

46 of 74

Relative MTR Maturity

47 of 74

German Land OB - 1944

48 of 74

Ratio of Divisions: 2.5 : 1

49 of 74

Impacts of MTRs

  • Both sides immature

- both high casualty rates - American Civil War

  • Both sides mature at similar rates

- casualty rates return to norm - War in Pacific

  • One side matures more quickly

- side ahead low / side behind high - Fall of France

  • Both sides mature

- casualty rates return to norm - Late WWII in Europe

50 of 74

The Cycle �History to Application

History

Theory

Doctrine

Strategy

Execution

51 of 74

52 of 74

53 of 74

Revolutions In Military Affairs�Concept Driven

  • Concept Pull
  • Procedures that implement concept
  • Organization that facilitates procedures
  • Technology that enables / facilitates

54 of 74

55 of 74

56 of 74

57 of 74

58 of 74

59 of 74

The USMC Gets It Right

History

Theory

Doctrine

Strategy

Wargame

60 of 74

61 of 74

62 of 74

63 of 74

64 of 74

MTR

65 of 74

RMA

66 of 74

Revolutions in Military Affairs�Technology vs Concept

  • Technology push - reactive
  • Concept pull - proactive

  • Technology more common
  • Concept more broad

  • Both require hardware, procedural and organizational change to achieve their full potential

67 of 74

MTR & RMA

Common Traits

  • Maturity is the product of all elements
  • Relative maturity key
  • Numbers can overcome greater maturity
  • Both require hardware, procedural and organizational change to achieve their full potential

68 of 74

The RMA

69 of 74

The RMA

70 of 74

RMA

71 of 74

Transformation

Advantages of the Term “Transformation”

  • Was NOT used by previous administration
  • Avoids silly debate over how big a change has to be to be considered “revolutionary”
  • Correctly implies broad scope of change

72 of 74

Main Points To Remember

  • Maturity is the product of all elements
  • Relative maturity key
  • Numbers can overcome greater maturity

73 of 74

Be Alert to Both Types of RMAs

  • Tech - Reactive
  • Concept - Proactive

74 of 74

Toward an RMA in the National Interest

  • What are our national objectives?
  • What concept of war can best achieve those objectives?
  • Quest for strategy that works:
    • for Democracies
    • against Dictators
  • What technologies are needed to implement?