1 of 35

An Accurate Assessment of the Situation��Determining a Community’s Wastewater Needs

Nick Haig- University of Minnesota

Onsite Sewage Treatment Program

haigx003@umn.edu - 612-625-9797

2 of 35

What is a site assessment?

  • Analyze records
  • Determine lot size
  • Locate well
  • Probe existing system
  • Conduct soil boring
  • Match soils
  • Determine seasonal water table depth
  • Locate potential drainfield area
  • Identify treatment options
  • Check/pump septic tank

3 of 35

Inspection: Results

  1. Certificate of compliance

  • Certificate of non-compliance

  • Imminent Threat to Public Health System (ITPHS)

  • Local policies affect results and homeowner requirements!

BUYER BEWARE!

4 of 35

What about a whole community?

5 of 35

MPCA Unsewered Area Alternative Analysis�

  1. Replace failed ISTS with new ISTS.
  2. Decentralized cluster system.
  3. Connect to existing facility.
  4. Connect to a facility, which requires an expansion.
  5. Construct a new wastewater and treatment facility.

Note: Solution may be a combination of approaches

6 of 35

Determining ‘Decentralized’ Feasibility

Typical assessment:

Complying

&

Non-complying

More complete assessment:

Complying

&

‘Could be’ Complying

&

‘Can’t be’ Complying

7 of 35

Comply

Don’t Comply

Minnesota Lake

Typical Assessment

8 of 35

Comply

Can’t Comply

Could Comply

Minnesota Lake

More Complete Assessment

9 of 35

Doing the more complete assessment

  • Map of parcels
  • Records:
    • Permits
    • Age of systems
    • Maintenance
  • Identify:
    • Likely compliant
    • Spot check
  • Properties to be checked:
    • No records
    • Possible un-permitted work
    • Older than XX years
    • Suspected problems

  • Map of findings

10 of 35

Septic System Components

Source

Tank

Drainfield

Treatment in Soil

Groundwater

Well

3 feet

11 of 35

Site Assessments: Soil Analysis

12 of 35

Inadequate Vertical Separation

Source

Tank

Drainfield

Inadequate Treatment

Groundwater

Well

3 feet

Pathogens

Nutrients

13 of 35

Mound System

Source

Tank

Treatment in Soil

Groundwater

Well

3 feet

Pump

Mound Treatment Area

14 of 35

What Kind of System is Bad (failing)?

  • Leaky Tanks

  • Surfacing to Ground

  • Inadequate Vertical Separation to Water Table

  • Direct Discharge

15 of 35

Drywells or Cesspools

16 of 35

Surfacing to the ground

17 of 35

18 of 35

Direct Discharge �(to surface, tile line, or body of water)

19 of 35

20 of 35

Veseli

  • Examined the records
  • Conducted 62 Site Evaluations
  • Determined the current status of systems
  • Assessed potential solutions for each property
  • Evaluated potential cluster sites
  • Produced map of findings
  • County cost for time, travel, reporting and some overhead - $76.90/site

21 of 35

Results

22 of 35

Possible Results

  • “In Compliance”- Meets current Rice Co. Ordinance
  • “Not In Compliance”- Does not meet current Rice County Ordinance, may need to be upgraded in the future
  • “Imminent Threat to Public Health System”- ground surface or surface water discharge, sewage backup into dwelling, drywell or cesspool.

23 of 35

Results

  • 60 Anticipated Site Evaluations
  • 62 Final Site Evaluations

  • About 60% of community needed to be inspected because of:

    • No records
    • Unpermitted work
    • Suspected direct discharges

  • Several homes have been upgraded since 1992 due to Rice County Septic Ordinance property transfer requirements

24 of 35

Actual Results

25 of 35

Public Health Threats- Stacked Up

26 of 35

Veseli- Overall Septic Situation

106

Buildings

27 of 35

Veseli- Overall Septic Compliance

28 of 35

Community Options�(in no particular order)

  • Regionalize to Lonsdale (2002 est. = $30,000)
  • One “decentralized” collection/treatment system for entire community
  • Several “cluster” collection/treatment systems for entire community
  • Upgrade all “non-compliant” systems with ISTS and cluster those that cannot fit ISTS

29 of 35

Options (cont.)

  • Upgrade systems that pose ITPH with ISTS and cluster where necessary
  • Allow new developments but require them to provide wastewater treatment for existing lots currently not in compliance

30 of 35

Site Evaluation Conclusions

31 of 35

Site Evaluation Cost Estimates

$4768*

$1997

$2771

Total

$75

$75

$0

Meals

$378

$180

$198

Mileage

$678

$270

$408

Overhead

$552

$312

$240

Reporting

$3085

$1160

$1925

Field Work

Total

WW Initiative

Rice County

* $76.90/ Site Evaluation

32 of 35

Beaver Lake

Individual “standard” system

Individual “other” system or a holding tank

Individual holding tank

Cluster system

33 of 35

Costs- Beaver Lake

  • $500 to local ISTS professional
  • In Kind not counted
  • $3000-$5000 estimated

34 of 35

Meriden

35 of 35

More complete assessment

  • Offers a complete understanding of the current situation
  • Basis to look at potential solutions
  • Helps determine appropriate boundaries
  • Fits with the funding hierarchy changes