1 of 23

Ten Years of Community Partnerships at a Student-Led Free Clinic: Lessons Learned

Debra Howenstine, MD

Natalie Long, MD

University of Missouri

Department of Family and Community Medicine

2 of 23

Disclosures

  • No conflicts of interest to declare.

3 of 23

MedZou Community Health Clinic

  • Associated with the University of Missouri – Columbia School of Medicine
  • Opened in October 2008
  • Primary Care clinics once per week on Thursday evenings
    • Average of 45 patients per month
    • Psychiatry care integrated once per month
  • Specialty clinics once per month on Monday evenings
    • Dermatology, Musculoskeletal (PM&R), Diabetes (endocrine and ophthalmology)
    • Neurology, Transgender care and Women’s Health clinics occur every other month

4 of 23

Overview

  • Initially planned to transitional care to local FQHC clinic
  • Now providing ongoing, longitudinal primary care
  • Student leadership primarily composed of M1/M2s
  • 1 year term on Board of Directors

  • Student directors notoriously enthusiastic and full of new ideas…

5 of 23

Story of the Mammogram Van

6 of 23

Story of the Mammogram Van

  • Grant Opportunity- Informal one paragraph application due tomorrow!
  • Requested $13,000, received $18,000

7 of 23

Alumni Magazine sent to all MU alumni:

“MedZou to provide Free Mammogram Services”

“MU women’s group gives $18,000 to MedZou”

8 of 23

But..

  • Mammograms and annual examinations not an unmet need

  • Purchasing and running a mobile mammography unit not feasible

9 of 23

Story of the Mammogram Van

  • Philanthropic group: funding had to be used as requested.

  • Banquet already scheduled to honor MedZou

  • Data quickly collected from multiple agencies on unmet women’s health needs and grant application rewritten

10 of 23

Mammogram Van: Lessons Learned

  • Enthusiasm must be balanced with oversight

  • Faculty involvement in program development / grant proposals provides an opportunity for students to learn that
    • needs assessments are critical
    • feasibility of implementation needs to be considered

11 of 23

Women’s Health Program

  • Outcome of Women’s Health grant award

  • Collaborated with the FQHC, Health Department and Planned Parenthood in identifying unmet needs

  • Started as a case management program connecting women with needed services, specifically colposcopy and LEEP

12 of 23

Planned Parenthood Fiasco

  • Price negotiations identified Planned Parenthood as lowest cost for colposcopy

And then….

13 of 23

14 of 23

So…

We developed an MOU with the University negotiating discounted prices for procedural services not covered by State Women’s Health Programs

15 of 23

Lessons Learned

  • Memorandums of Understanding
    • Nonbinding agreement between two or more parties outlining the terms and details of an understanding, including each parties' requirements and responsibilities.
  • Needed to clarify roles and responsibilities of your organization and community organizations
    • Sets expectations
    • Can be adjusted based on changing needs

16 of 23

Women’s Health - Funding Woes

  • Colposcopy and LEEP are expensive procedures
  • Student leadership researched costs and feasibility of performing colposcopy on site
  • Faculty commitment to attend clinics every other month

  • Able to save money and afford more expensive LEEPs

17 of 23

Women’s Health

  • This past year began directly providing services such as colposcopy and cervical biopsies
  • Colposcope donated from FQHC
  • Other equipment used on loan
  • New grant just received which will allow for additional purchase of equipment

18 of 23

19 of 23

PreP for our patients

  • Student interest in providing Pre-Exposure HIV Prophylaxis for MedZou patients.
  • Conducted patient survey documenting interest
  • Found way to obtain medication without cost. Worked with Health Department on protocol.
  • Cost of lab for monitoring $338/yr –With 13 pts, over 50% of total annual lab budget

20 of 23

PreP: Lessons Learned

  • Not all good ideas can be immediately be implemented
  • Need was identified
  • Resources explored
  • Financial sustainability essential
  • Barrier to implementation clarified
  • Future implementation feasible if barrier can be eliminated.

21 of 23

22 of 23

Take Home Points

New Programs Involving Community Partners Should:

  • Address an unmet need
  • Provide benefit to patients and community
  • Be financially feasible
  • Sustainable

23 of 23

Questions?