1 of 35

BIOMEDICAL TRANSDUCERS

BIOSENSORS

Dra. Rossana Madrid

LAMEIN – Dpto. de Bioingeniería

FACET-UNT / INSIBIO-CONICET

2 of 35

INDEX

  • Introduction
  • Applications
  • General Characteristics
  • Biosensor
    • Enzymatic
    • Microbiological
    • Inmunological
  • Bioreceptors. Immobilization Methods
  • 1º, 2º y 3º generation Amperometric Sensors

3 of 35

INTRODUCTION

    • To locate nutrients
    • To find the females
    • To distance itself from poisons

Chemical

Receptors

One can use these receptors to sense (measure) substances

They exchange information with their environment

4 of 35

Physical Biodetection

Chemical Reactions

  • The information is transmitted through a set of physicochemical reactions

Recognition Tools

Physical principles

5 of 35

Through these receptors events are transduced in measurable quantities

One can use:

      • Cells
      • Tissues
      • Proteins
      • Enzymes

To build

the biosensor

6 of 35

A brief history

  • 1962 Clark and Lyons
  • 1967 Updike and Hicks

Electrodo

de O2

Enz

Glu

O2

Glucose + O2 Gluconic Acid + H2O2

Glucose oxidase

pO2 Reduction

[Glu]

BIOSENSOR

Existing Sensor + Biological System

7 of 35

7

Selectively recognizes the chemical information present in the sample

Signal recognized by the transducer

Conversion

Recognizes the signal from the bioreceptor

Actionable electrical signal

Conversion

CARACTERISTICS

  • Repeatability
  • Reproducibility
  • Selectivity
  • Sensitivity
  • Linear response
  • Good time response
  • LOD: 3.3 σB/S
  • LOQ: 10 σB/S

8 of 35

  • Specificity” is sought in a biosensor

That recognizes only 1 analyte among many

Very difficult to obtain

So we talk about selectivity

9 of 35

CLASSIFICATION

  • According to the type of receiver used

  • According to the immobilization methodology used

  • According to the principle of transduction used�
    • Electrochemical
      • Potentiometric
      • Amperometric
    • Photometric
    • Masics
    • Thermometers

10 of 35

Electrochemical Detection�Potentiometric Technique

  • It measures the potential difference between two electrodes immersed in a solution
  • Nernst equation

11 of 35

Electrochemical Detection�Amperometric Technique

  • I ∝ [activ electrochemcial species]
  • Example: glucose electrode

12 of 35

Electrochemical Detection�Amperometric Technique

  • FETs, ISFETs solve the problem of high Zout.
  • I drenaje ∝ pH
  • The Biological System is immobilized on the SiO2 layer

13 of 35

Thermometric Detection

  • The enthalpy of the reaction is detected
  • Methods
    • Optical
    • Mechanical
    • Electrical
  • Thermocuples
  • Thermistors
  • Rapid response

14 of 35

Piezoelectric Detection

  • Small variations in mass

  • Examples
    • enzyme-inhibitor association
    • antigen-antibody coupling

15 of 35

Optical Sensors

  • Optical fibers are used to measure:�

Absorption�Fluorescence�Bio / chemiluminescence

  • Very low concentrations can be detected

16 of 35

Microbial Biosensors

  • Microorganisms Enzymatic systems

ADVANTAGE

  • Maintains the enzyme in its natural environment ensuring regeneration of any cofactor�

DISADVANTAGES

  • Permanent fresh culture medium
  • Low specificity

17 of 35

BIOSENSORS - CONSTRUCTION

Immobilization of

the bioreceptor

Transducer

Selection

Bioreceptor

Selection

Molecular

recognition “device”

18 of 35

SELECTION OF THE TRANSDUCER

  • It depends on:

    • the type of reaction and the substances released or consumed

    • That meet biocompatibility criteria (environment)

    • Chemical interferents

19 of 35

Advantages and disadvantages of using biological materials in biosensors

TYPE OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL

ADVANTAGES

DISADVANTAGES

Enzyme

  • Coordinate the substrate
  • High selectivity
  • High sensitivity
  • Shows catalytic activity
  • Reacts quickly
  • Very expensive
  • They lose activity when immobilized
  • They deactivate in short periods of time

Animal or vegetable tissues

  • Enzymes are kept in their natural environment
  • Enzyme activity stabilizes
  • They work where pure enzymes fail
  • They are cheaper than pure enzymes
  • Pérdida de selectividad
  • Son mezclas de enzimas, las cuales algunas veces desactivan el sensor

Microorganisms

  • Low overall costs
  • Less likely to be inhibited
  • More tolerant to changes in pH and temperature.
  • Shelf life > than enzymes
  • They take longer to generate responses
  • They have a longer reuse time
  • Loss of selectivity x the variety of enzymes present

Nucleic Acids

  • Highly selective
  • They can be used for detection of genetic flaws, diseases, infect. virals etc
  • They can identify similar genes by tagging techniques
  • Very expensive technology
  • Insulated and certified material is required
  • Requires specialized personnel for its use

20 of 35

  • The biological material (enzyme) must remain active
  • Must allow repetitive determinations
  • In some cases immobilization of more than one enzyme is required
  • In some cases the cofactor needs to be co-immobilized

IMPORTANT (By immobilizing biological material)

21 of 35

BIORECEPTOR IMMOBILIZATION

  • In polyacrylamide gels
  • In dialysis membranes
  • Electromagnetic immobilization

Physical Methods:

Chemical Unions:

  • Cross-linking
  • Covalent Unions
  • Others

22 of 35

PHYSICAL IMMOBILIZATION

In membranes

Electromagnetic

23 of 35

CROSS-LINKING

24 of 35

CROSS-LINKING

  • IMMERSION METHOD

  • DIRECT UNION METHOD
  • USE OF SPRAYS

25 of 35

MICROORGANISMS IMMOBILIZATION

26 of 35

BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS

  • Most are enzyme sensors

  • Biosensors to measure metabolites: Urea, creatinine, cholesterol, acetylcholine, lactate

  • Immunological sensors:

    • Not used in-vivo they need the addition of reagents
    • Very slow Ag-AC complex formation

27 of 35

Amperometric Sensors

  • Amperometry electrochemical method
  • Signal of interest I [Analyte]

The direction of the electron flow depends on the properties of the analyte

Can be controlled with the

voltage applied to the

work electrode

Pt or Au

28 of 35

Amperometric Sensors

  • Bipolar or tripolar measurements can be performed

WE: Au, C o Pt

Ref: Ag/AgCl

CE: Pt, Acero

29 of 35

Amperometric Sensors

  • According to the transfer processes of e- :

    • 1st generation biosensors
      • The product of the reaction diffuses into the transducer and produces the electrical response

    • 2nd generation biosensors
      • They involve specific "mediators" between the reaction and the transducer for better responses

    • 3rd generation biosensors
      • The reaction itself causes the response and there is no directly involved product diffusion or mediator.

30 of 35

1º, 2º and 3º generation Biosensors

31 of 35

  • Substrate, products or cofactors must have electrochemical properties
  • 1st biosensor (Clark & Lions, 1953)

GOx +Buff retained in dyalisis Monted over the gas membrane

membrane of an O2 sensor

Glucose + O2 Gluconic Acid + H2O2

O2 + 4H+ 2 H2O

1º generation Biosensors

32 of 35

  • 1973 Guibault and Lubrano

H2O2 O2 + 2H+ + 2e-

  • An adequate electro-oxidation potential of H2O2 is applied

  • Redox reaction of H2O2 900 mV vs. Ag/AgCl

1º generation Biosensors

Interferents

33 of 35

  • “Electronic Mediation”. A Mediator is incorporated

  • e- transference

GOx Active site Electrode Surface

Low molecular weight redox pairs

They can be used free in solution or immobilized together with the Enzymes

2º generation Biosensors

Mediators

34 of 35

  • ADVANTAGES
    • Greater selectivity
    • Less susceptible to interferers

  • DISADVANTAGES
    • E-protein-electrode transfer impossible, slow or irreversible
    • Decreases exponentially with distance
    • Proteins tend to denature by contact with the surface

3º generation Biosensors

35 of 35

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  • Madrid, R; Chehín, R.; Chen, T-H and Guiseppi-Elie. Biosensors and Nanobiosensors. 2017. In: Further Understanding the Human Machine. Ed.: Max Valentinuzzi. World Scientific Publisher (WSP), Singapore.
  • Tran Minh Canh. 1993. Biosensors. Chapman & Hall and Masson. The British Library.
  • Alegret, S.; del Valle, M.; Merkoci, A. 2004. Sensores electroquimicos, ed. Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona-Servei de Publicacions.
  • Wang, J. 2001. Glucose biosensors: 40 years of advances and challenges. Electroanalysis, vol. 13(12), 983-988.
  • State of the Art in Biosensors - General Aspects. Edited by Toonika Rinken, ISBN 978-953-51-1004-0, 351 pages, Publisher: InTech, Chapters published March 13, 2013 under CC BY 3.0 license. DOI: 10.5772/45832. OPEN ACCESS BOOK