Transnational identity exploration and collaborative autoethnography for individual and community transformation
Agenda
Stage 1: Gaining insights into our transnational identities (~80 minutes)
Stage 2: Making plans (~40 minutes)
Positive words of affirmation
What is identity?
imagined
historical
negotiated
ongoing
performed
contradictory
shifting
complex
changing
claimed
ascribed
Identity
“do” not “have”
socially constructed
site of growth
contested
contextualized
dynamic
lifelong
process of becoming
Identity work could be more important than knowledge of our field (Kanno & Stuart, 2011)
not fixed
fluid
multiple
emotional
Why explore identity?
(Fairley, 2024; Morgan, 2009; Varghese et al., 2016)
What is transnationality?
What is transnationality?
Crossing/blurring of national borders: physical and virtual – of people, ideas/knowledge, languages, ways of knowing, being, doing
“As pluri-cultural and pluri-lingual individuals with multiple memberships— linguistic, cultural, national, professional—teachers embody the idea of the transnational” (Gallardo, 2018, p. 18).
Why explore transnationality: Research findings
(Fairley, 2024; Gu & Canagarajah, 2018; Menard-Warwick, 2008; Rudolph et al., 2019; Solano-Campos, 2014; Yazan et al., 2023; Fairley, Young, ElShimi, Fathelbab, forthcoming)
Transnational identity exploration activities
Throughout, keep our purpose in mind:
To prepare for collaborative autoethnography to answer our Research Question:
How can we use our transnational identities and joy to promote transformation in education/communities?
Activity 1: Connecting to transnationality through mind mapping
In what ways are you transnational? Think about and mind map (5 min):
In breakout rooms (10 min):
Optional sharing of a few insights gained through this activity
Mind map examples
Critical incidents: What & why?
What are critical incidents?
Why explore them?
(Akbari, 2020; Kayi-Aydar & Miller, 2021)
Activity 2: Exploring critical incidents with transnationality
Artistic expression of what brings you joy: Why explore what brings you joy?
Healing and affirmation of identity
Joy and well-being are crucial for sustainable activism and community change. Reflection on joy becomes a healing practice that affirms identity and nurtures commitment (Ginwright, 2016).
Empowerment for transformation
Love and joy are not distractions from justice work, but integral to it. We can frame joy as part of an ethic of care that can empower resistance and transformation (hooks, 2000).
Culturally sustaining practice
Reflecting on joy can help educators recognize what sustains themselves and their students, making identity a vehicle for empowerment rather than assimilation (Paris & Alim, 2017).
Activity 3: Artistic expression of what brings you joy
Example of artistic expression of what brings joy
Collaborative autoethnography: What and why?
Autoethnography (AE):
(Bishop, 2021; Ellis et al, 2011)
Collaborative autoethnography (CAE):
(Lawrence & Nagashima, 2020; Tezgiden‐Cakcak & Ataş, 2024; Yazan et al., 2023)
Collaborative autoethnography: How?
Guided by principles:
Steps for our CAE:
Share and discuss to gain further insights and articulate action plans
Share one take-away from today’s session in the chat
Wrap-up
Follow up: 5 minute poster: Positive words of affirmation
What are positive words of affirmation?
Positive words of affirmation are kind, encouraging statements that express love, support, and appreciation, helping to build confidence and emotional well-being.
Steps:
Contact us
Mariah Fairley
Heba Fathelbab
Any Questions?
References
Akbari, R. (2020). Critical reflective teaching: Creating opportunities for transformative learning. Reflective Practice, 21(3), 356–368.
Bishop, M. (2021). ‘Don’t tell me what to do’: Encountering colonialism in the academy and pushing back with Indigenous autoethnography. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 34(5), 367-378.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 273–290.
Fairley, M. J. (2024). Exploring transnationality as a resource for promoting social justice in language teacher identity construction: Insights from an inquiry group. Teaching and Teacher Education, 137, 104398.
Fairley, M. J., Young, A., Elshimi, E., Fathelbab, H. (forthcoming). Transnational identity as resource for collective agency: A collaborative autoethnography. In H. Uysal & A. Gao (Eds.) Language teacher agency: Trans-perspective approaches and actionable strategies. Springer.
Gallardo, M. (2019). Transcultural voices: Exploring notions of identity in transnational language teachers’ personal narratives. In Negotiating Identity in Modern Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 17–43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27709-3_2
Ginwright, S. (2016). Hope and Healing in Urban Education: How Urban Activists and Teachers are Reclaiming Matters of the Heart.
Gu, M. M., & Canagarajah, S. (2018). Harnessing the professional value of a transnational disposition: Perceptions of migrant English language teachers in Hong Kong. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 718–740. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw048
Hooks, b. (2000). All About Love: New Visions.
Kanno, Y., & Stuart, C. (2011). Learning to become a second language teacher: Identities‐in‐practice. The Modern language journal, 95(2), 236-252.
Kayi-Aydar, H., & Miller, E. R. (2021). Positioning and critical incidents in language teacher identity research. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 901–912.
Lawrence, L., & Nagashima, Y. (2020). The intersectionality of gender, sexuality, race, and Native-speakerness: Investigating ELT teacher identity through duoethnography. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 19(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2019.1672173
Menard‐Warwick, J. (2008). The cultural and intercultural identities of transnational English teachers: Two case studies from the Americas. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 617–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00151.x
Morgan, B. (2009). Fostering transformative practitioners for critical EAP: Possibilities and challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.09.001
Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2017). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies: Teaching and Learning for Justice in a Changing World.
Rudolph, N., Yazan, B., & Rudolph, J. (2019). Negotiating ‘ares,’‘cans,’and ‘shoulds’ of being and becoming in English language teaching: Two teacher accounts from one Japanese university. Asian Englishes, 21(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1471639
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Solano-Campos, A. (2014). The making of an international educator: Transnationalism and nonnativeness in English teaching and learning. TESOL Journal, 5(3), 412–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.156
Tezgiden‐Cakcak, Y., & Ataş, U. (2024). Becoming and being a critical language teacher educator: A duoethnography. TESOL Journal, 15(4), e855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.855
Varghese, M., Motha, S., Park, G., Reeves, J., & Trent, J. (2016). Language teacher identity in (multi) lingual educational contexts [Special Issue]. TESOL Quarterly, 50(3), 541–783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesq.333
Wheeldon, J., & Ahlberg, M. (2019). Mind maps in qualitative research. In Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 1113–1129). Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
Yazan, B., Penton Herrera, L. J., & Rashed, D. (2023). Transnational TESOL practitioners’ identity tensions: A collaborative autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 57(1), 140–167.