1 of 24

What is Theory?

2 of 24

Theory is NOT:

  • Correlation
  • Description
  • Interpretation
  • Absence of data
  • Ideology

3 of 24

Theory IS:

  • A general, abstract explanation

4 of 24

Theories simplify reality

  • The world is complex
  • Theories tell us what to pay attention to

5 of 24

Theories have empirical implications

  • Assume the existence of a real world
    • Aim to increase understanding, not to accomplish political, moral, or social ends

  • Have empirical implications
    • If X, then Y, where X and Y are observables

6 of 24

Social theories

  • Explain social rather than individual outcomes
    • We are interested in explaining the behavior of social systems rather than of individuals

7 of 24

Social theories

  • Are composed of
    • Causal relations
    • Causal mechanisms

8 of 24

Causal Relations

  • The outcome
    • The thing you are trying to explain
    • Also called
      • Dependent variable
      • Effect

9 of 24

Causal Relations, cont’d

  • The cause
    • A factor such that change in it is associated with change in the outcome
    • Also called
      • Independent variable

10 of 24

Causal Relations, cont’d

  • So, X causes Y if by modifying X, one can affect Y
    • An explanation includes an assertion of such a causal relation

11 of 24

Causal Mechanisms

  • The link between the cause and the outcome
    • In other words, the process through which the cause leads to the outcome

We will say more about this later

12 of 24

How do we know which theory is best?

  • Empirical evidence
    • Theories produce empirical predictions about how change in a causal variable will affect an outcome variable
    • These predictions are called hypotheses

13 of 24

Example: Durkheim’s theory of suicide

  • The level of individualism in a group affects the rate of suicide in the group
  • Individualism – a cause
    • The degree to which individual activities are controlled by individuals themselves rather than by others
  • Suicide rate – an outcome
    • Some countries/groups have a low rate; others a relatively high one

14 of 24

Empirical implications

    • If Protestants are more individualistic than Catholics
      • Then Protestants in France will have higher suicide rates than Catholics in France
    • If unmarried men are more individualistic than married men
      • Then unmarried men will have a higher rate of suicide than married men

15 of 24

Empirical implications, cont’d

  • To determine whether the predictions are supported by the data, we must pay attention to three things:
    • Correlation
    • Causal Order
    • Spuriousness

16 of 24

Correlation

  • A change in X is associated with a change in outcome Y

17 of 24

Causal order

  • The cause must occur before the effect
    • It is possible to change the value of the dependent variable by changing the causal variable
    • In other words, if you change X, Y will change

Cause Outcome

(x) (Y)

18 of 24

Non-spuriousness

  • To infer causality, all possible spurious causes of Y (the dependent variable) must be ruled out
    • That is, the researcher must determine that a third variable is not responsible for the observed relation between X and Y

19 of 24

Example: The Protestant Ethic

  • Max Weber noted that the initial geographic distribution of European industrial capitalism seemed correlated with the % of Protestants in a country
    • Protestantism 🡪 industrial capitalism
  • Possible spurious causes
    • Perhaps countries with large coal reserves tended to be Protestant
    • If coal reserves 🡪 industrial capitalism, then Protestantism is a spurious relation

20 of 24

Example The Protestant Ethic

Capitalism

Protestantism

Coal Reserves

21 of 24

Assessing theories

  • If the theoretical predictions are consistent with what we observe, then we have more confidence in the theory

22 of 24

Caveats

  • Very few ‘classical theories’ live up to these expectations
    • They do not always explicitly articulate causal relations and causal mechanisms
  • Not many contemporary ones do, either

23 of 24

Theories are imperfect

  • Theories simplify reality
    • Theories must omit much, must overemphasize much
  • Hence, all theories are imperfect

24 of 24

How to choose between rival theories?

  • Ultimate criterion: empirical adequacy
    • The best theory is the one that is most consistent with observable empirical phenomena