Electrical ground securing is a critical operation in ensuring safety and reliability within electrical systems. However, inefficiencies in this process can lead to increased risk of electrical hazards and operational disruptions. This paper presents a comprehensive application of the Six Sigma methodology to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of electrical ground securing operations. The study begins with a thorough analysis of the current state of the ground securing process, identifying key performance metrics, and pinpointing areas of inefficiency and potential improvement. Utilizing Six Sigma Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC) framework, a structured approach is employed to systematically address the identified issues. Through rigorous data collection and analysis, root causes of inefficiencies such as variability in grounding procedures, inadequate training, and inconsistent equipment maintenance are identified.
Fahad M. Sharique, Nithin K. Aili, Sibin Mathew and Ahad Ali
A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical, Robotics and Industrial Engineering, Lawrence Technological University, Michigan, USA
xxx@ltu.edu, xxxx@ltu.edu, xxxx@ltu.edu and sali@ltu.edu
Abstract
Conclusion
References
Methodology
Johnson, L. (2019). “Six Sigma Fundamentals and Its Application in Manufacturing,” Quality Control & Applied Statistics, 64(4), 334-340.
Zhao, F., et al. (2022). “Improving Ground Nut Securing in Automotive Assembly through Six Sigma Methodology,” Operations Management Research, 15(3), 203-219.
Introduction
In today's competitive industrial environment, cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and quality can only be guaranteed by operational process optimization. A critical component of assembly line operations is the proper attaching of ground nuts, particularly when constructing electrical components. The effectiveness of this process, as well as the caliber of the final product, affects the dependability and safety of electrical systems. Assembly lines can speed up the ground nut securing procedure and promote continuous improvement across the whole manufacturing process by implementing Six Sigma methodologies.
The purpose of this study is to investigate how applying the Six Sigma approach to the electrical ground nut securing process in an assembly line setting can improve its effectiveness and efficiency. This study aims to identify current process deficiencies, establish sustainable control mechanisms, analyze root causes of variation, establish performance metrics, and implement targeted improvements using an organized. By implementing the Six Sigma principles, businesses can ultimately reach greater standards of quality, dependability, and customer satisfaction, setting them up for success in today's fast-paced industrial environment.
To sum up, there are several advantages to changing the tool angle specifications from 5–1200 degrees to 50–370 degrees, including a decreased risk of cross-threading and nut stripping. You can improve the integrity and dependability of threaded fastening connections and guarantee their performance and durability in a variety of applications by concentrating on optimal thread engagement, decreased material deformation, improved thread form, improved thread quality, and optimized machining parameters.
Process Improvement of an Electrical Ground Nut Securing Operation in an Assembly Plant Using Six Sigma
Project Objectives
Phase 1: Define
The issue of ground nut looseness in an assembly process refers to a situation where the nut used for grounding purposes becomes loose within the assembly, leading to electrical failures or malfunctions. This issue can occur due to various factors such as improper tightening during assembly, vibration or movement during operation, inadequate torque specifications, or degradation over time.
Factors such as the materials used, the mechanism of torque transmission, and the precision of components can significantly impact the tool's performance. Additionally, environmental conditions, including temperature, humidity, and vibration, can affect the friction and resistance encountered during tool operation, thereby influencing both the angle and torque applied. Figure below shows a fishbone diagram of the main factors that can affect the process of securing ground by an operator in an assembly line.
Figure 4. Process capability report of Angle 1
Phase 3: Analyze
Phase 4: Implementation
Phase 5: Control
The objective of the project is to increase the electrical ground nut securing process's efficiency and effectiveness on a manufacturing line by applying Six Sigma methodology. The study aims to decrease errors, boost efficiency, and uphold consistent quality standards by thoroughly evaluating and improving the ground nut securing procedure. Ultimately, this would increase consumer trust and commitment to the produced goods.
Implementing a knockdown station to track the tool angle specification and verify its compliance can be a proactive approach to reduce failure modes in manufacturing processes. By integrating a knockdown station into the production line, components can be systematically inspected for adherence to the specified tool angle parameters before proceeding further.
Figure 1 : Process flow diagram of ground nut secure operation
Figure 2 : Block diagram for Electrical failures in a week
Problem Statement
In the context of vehicle maintenance and operation, there exists a recurring issue where groundnuts within the vehicle's electrical system become loose, resulting in vehicle non-starting instances. This problem poses significant inconvenience and potential safety hazards for vehicle operators, leading to operational disruptions and potentially stranded vehicles. The challenge is to develop effective strategies or solutions to prevent ground nut loosening and mitigate its impact on vehicle functionality and reliability.
Process Layout
Phase 2: Measurements
This phase is to verify the validity of data through the evaluation of the measurement system. The beginning step is the normality test of the data collected and an analysis of the process capability. For this phase data of all the Torque and Angle specification of the tools used to secure the groundnut is collected for the analysis. Table 1 shows the data of Torque and Angle data of the tool.
Table 1: Angle and Torque measurements of the tool
Figure 3. Factors affecting the process of securing a ground nut
Figure 5. Process capability report of Angle 2
Figure 6. Process capability report of Torque
Vehicle | Angle Limit Low – High (Degree) | Angle 1 (Degree) | Angle 2 (Degree) | Torque Limit Low – High (Nm) | Torque 1 (Nm) | Torque2 (Nm) | Tool Knockdown |
1 | 50-370 | 58 | 59 | 10-14 | 12.3 | 12.5 | P |
2 | 50-370 | 158 | 64 | 10-14 | 12.5 | 12.5 | P |
3 | 50-370 | 22 | 62 | 10-14 | 12.2 | 12.4 | F |
4 | 50-370 | 16 | 74 | 10-14 | 12.2 | 12.3 | F |
5 | 50-370 | 85 | 224 | 10-14 | 12.3 | 12.4 | P |
6 | 50-370 | 72 | 18 | 10-14 | 12.4 | 12.5 | F |
7 | 50-370 | 140 | 99 | 10-14 | 12.1 | 12.6 | P |
8 | 50-370 | 350 | 79 | 10-14 | 12.4 | 12.1 | P |
9 | 50-370 | 115 | 127 | 10-14 | 12.2 | 12.0 | P |
10 | 50-370 | 44 | 128 | 10-14 | 12.4 | 12.4 | F |
11 | 50-370 | 46 | 113 | 10-14 | 12.5 | 12.4 | F |
12 | 50-370 | 125 | 155 | 10-14 | 12.0 | 12.1 | P |
13 | 50-370 | 127 | 160 | 10-14 | 12.6 | 11.9 | P |
14 | 50-370 | 97 | 200 | 10-14 | 12.2 | 12.2 | P |
15 | 50-370 | 43 | 113 | 10-14 | 12.4 | 12.3 | F |
Table 2: Angle and Torque measurements of the tool after knockdown added in the station
Figure 7. Block diagram for Electrical failures in a week after implementation
Your University Logo
9th Bangladesh International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Dhaka, Bangladesh, December 26-27, 2026
2026 Bangladesh
Results
Data and Analysis