1 of 23

CHARLES E. RODERICK

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Town Meeting Presentation

June 1, 2026

2 of 23

School Building Committee

Philip Jordan, Chair

Michelle Rouse, Vice-Chair

Veronica Gonzalez, Secretary

Allan Cameron

Glenn Gillespie

Edward Goddard

Michael King

Kevin Martes

Tony Roberto

Shannon Shepherd

Project Team

WELCOME

Vertex – Owner’s Project Manager

Jeff D’Amico – Project Director

Emily Sarazin – Senior Project Manager

Eric Rubin – Project Manager

TSKP Studio – Architect

Randall Luther – Principal-in-Charge

Jesse Saylor – Project Manager

Archana Pai – Project Architect

Oleg Kozlovski – Project Architect

MSBA Study | Roderick Elementary School

3 of 23

  • Roderick is near the end of life, Vogel is past end of life:
    • Infrastructure, safety & security, and educational space concerns at both.
    • Expensive to maintain, repair, renovate, and/or replace.
  • MSBA partnership allows Wrentham to spend a maximum of $55.9 million for a new school to replace both buildings:
    • Less expensive than renovating the two buildings for $67.6 million.
    • Includes cost to demolish both buildings when project is complete.
  • Increases Roderick usable S/F from 55,962 to 100,620:
    • Allows for projected growth into foreseeable future.
  • Addresses infrastructure, safety & security, and educational space concerns for the school district.

3

Presentation Summary

4 of 23

Vogel School:

  • Built in 1935.

Both buildings have significant problems relating to infrastructure, safety & security, and educational space.

4

Why Does Wrentham Need a Building Project?

Roderick School:

  • Built in 1968.
  • Addition in 1988.

5 of 23

  • Mechanical systems.
  • Roofs, doors, & windows.
  • Electrical infrastructure.
  • Expensive to heat.
  • Accessibility.

5

Infrastructure

Boilers

Windows and Doors

Classroom ventilators

Pneumatic controls

Outdated Tech in classrooms

Original, Low Capacity - Switchboard and Panels

Roof

6 of 23

  • Multiple points of entry.
  • Single-pane windows.
  • Lack of dedicated SRO office/visible presence.
  • Sprinklers/Fire Escapes.
  • Asbestos/PCBs.
  • Lack of emergency vehicle access.

6

Safety and Security

Point of entry

7 of 23

  • Inadequate classroom, office, and storage space.
  • No gym, auditorium, stage, science lab, or general music room.
  • Inefficient design for grades 5 and 6.

7

Educational Space

Closets converted into Classrooms

Storage space lacking

8 of 23

  • 11/2021: Applied to MSBA for financial support with a major building project.
  • 12/2022: Wrentham one of nine communities invited to partner with MSBA (100+ applied).
  • 11/2023: Town Meeting unanimously approved $1.1 million for feasibility study.
  • 7/2024: School Building Committee hired Vertex and TSKP.
    • Reviewed addition/renovation vs new building.
    • New is less expensive, faster to build, and better investment.

8

Timeline

Point of entry

9 of 23

9

New Building: Grades 3-6

  • Two-story design with secure access and visible police office.
  • Same campus as Delaney for efficiencies (sharing staff members, transportation).
  • Play area adjacent to ball fields, protected from traffic.
  • Increased parking and improved traffic flow.
  • Emergency vehicle access and service area.

Delaney: PreK through 2

  • Additional space for expanded pre-kindergarten, increased enrollment.

Existing Roderick and Vogel

  • In use during construction, raised and replaced by open fields when complete.
  • New school open 2029.

Roderick Elementary School | Site plan

10 of 23

10

Roderick Elementary School | Level 1

Key Adjacencies:

  1. Gym to Stage to Cafeteria
  2. Music to Stage
  3. Admin/Medical/SRO to Entrance
  4. Special Education and ILC, SLC, ALC to corresponding age/grade level
  5. Teacher workrooms to academic areas
  6. Academic areas to Extended Learning
  7. Café to outdoor dining, playgrounds

Flexibility:

  1. Music room becomes “backstage” for performances
  2. Commons as lobby, corridor, group assembly, community forum

Commons

Gymnatorium

Cafeteria

11 of 23

11

Roderick Elementary School | Level 2

Learning Community

12 of 23

12

Roderick Elementary School | Learning Community

Small Group Instruction

13 of 23

13

Roderick Elementary School | Entry Plaza

14 of 23

14

Roderick Elementary School | Playground

15 of 23

  • Total Project Budget Not to Exceed $106,550,000:
    • The total cost might be less based on bond rate, contingencies built in that we may not use, may get lower costs when bids come in.
    • This includes the $1.1 million the Town paid for the feasibility study.
  • MSBA Maximum Reimbursement:
    • $46,066,828 (43.24% of the total project budget).
  • Sustainability Rebates from Mass Save and Inflation Reduction Act:
    • $4,588,360 (4.3% of the total project budget).
  • Projected Town Share:
    • $55,894,812 (52.46% of the total project budget).

Total Project Budget and Reimbursement

16 of 23

North Andover Kittredge Elementary $964/SF

Stoughton South Elementary $907/SF

Leominster Fall Brook Elementary $858/SF

Littleton Shaker Lane Elementary $841/SF

Marlborough Richer Elementary $815/SF

Wrentham Roderick Elementary $812/SF

$866/SF is the average construction cost, which would have added $5,433,480 to this project.

16

Cost Efficiency

City / Town

Project Name

Type

Construction Cost per SF

MSBA Elementary Schools with Construction Starts in 2026-27

17 of 23

Tax Impact

  • The average single-family home assessed value is $711,823.
  • Projected Taxes on average family home is $627 annually.
  • Interest rates and other variables subject to change at the time of the long term borrowing:

Tax Impact

18 of 23

18

New

Total Cost

MSBA Share

Energy Incentives (Federal, Utility)

Wrentham’s Share

Percent of Total

$ 106,550,000

$55,894,812

$ 46,066,828

Roderick

$ 4,588,360

52.46%

Roderick Elementary School | Total Project Cost Summary

19 of 23

19

New

Total Cost

MSBA Share

Energy Incentives (Federal, Mass Save)

Wrentham’s Share

Percent of Total

Roderick

Roderick Elementary School | Total Project Cost Summary

Maintain + Code Upgrade

$ 52,600,000 + $15,000,000

$67,600,000

$ 0

$ 0

Maintenance Needs

  • Replace all windows and doors.
  • Accessible clearances at doors.
  • Mechanical & electrical systems.
  • Roof replacement/masonry.
  • Toilet room accessibility.
  • Replace asphalt paving.
  • Fire escapes.

100%

Roderick + Vogel

RODERICK SCHOOL

$ 106,550,000

$55,894,812

$ 46,066,828

$ 4,588,360

52.46%

20 of 23

Concerns that can be addressed:

  • Roofs, doors, windows.

  • Mechanical systems.

  • Electrical Systems.

  • ADA/Access (somewhat).

  • Fire escapes.

Concerns that cannot be addressed:

  • Security concerns due to multiple points of entry, no dedicated SRO office, limited emergency vehicle access.

  • High cost of energy use.

  • Inadequate classroom space and inefficient design layout.

  • No gymnasium or performance space.

  • Inefficient traffic circulation and inadequate parking.

Concerns that Can/Cannot be Addressed Via

Short-Term Capital Investment

Switchboard at end of life – panels lack capacity

Classroom Induction Unit/Univent

Closet converted to a classroom

Congested site circulation lacks safe drop off, play areas and parking

20

21 of 23

This project will allow the Town to build a new school for students in grades 3 through 6 on the same campus as Delaney School.

    • Address the infrastructure, safety & security, and educational space problems at Roderick and Vogel.
    • Relocate the offices, classrooms, and storage from Vogel School:
      • Raise Vogel and Roderick, replace with open space (cost included in project).
      • Expand pre kindergarten options, allow for expansion if enrollment increases.
    • Save the town tens of millions of dollars by partnering with the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA), Mass Save, and Inflation Reduction Act.
    • Have a positive impact on the town for generations.

21

What Will This Project Accomplish?

22 of 23

  • A YES vote will advance the project to a special election on June 15:
    • If the June 15 vote is affirmative, the new school will open in September of 2029.
    • If the June 15 vote is negative, the MSBA partnership ends.

  • A NO vote will end the MSBA partnership.
  • The town will not receive the $46,066,828.
  • It will take 5 to 7 years to get another opportunity to partner with MSBA.
  • Infrastructure, safety & security, and educational space problems persist.

22

Your Vote Matters

23 of 23

23

Q&A