1 of 24

Victor Musiime, MBChB, MMed, PhDAssociate Professor, Makerere University�Senior Research Consultant, Joint Clinical Research Centre�Kampala, Uganda

Antiretroviral Therapy through the Ages: Optimal Regimens for Children and Adolescents Living with HIV

2 of 24

  • Dual Regimens

  • Long acting injectable ART*

  • Options for second line ART*

Contents

*ART: antiretroviral therapy

3 of 24

Background

  • Children and adolescents face life long ART* amidst treatment fatigue and long term toxicities
  • ART regimens should be easy to take, have low risk of toxicity, but yet remain highly effective
  • Approaches for optimisation
    • Single tablet regimens
    • Dual therapy
    • Long acting injectables

*ART: antiretroviral therapy

4 of 24

Dual Regimens

  • Early studies among CLHIV* showed that dual NRTI based regimens were associated with inferior virologic response, compared to triple (2NRTI+1NNRTI or PI) based regimens [Romanelli RMC et al. J Pediatr 2006]

  • Recent studies among adults with integrase inhibitor based regimens (dolutegravir + lamivudine) showed non inferiority virologically, compared triple ART regimens
    • GEMINI 1 and 2 [Cahn P, et al. J Acquir Immun Defic Syndr 2020]
    • TANGO [van Wyk et al. CID 2020]

  • Long acting injectable dual regimens (cabotegravir + rilpivirine) non inferior virologically to triple oral ART regimens [Orkin C et al. NEJM 2020; Swindels S et al. NEJM 2020]

*CLHIV – Children Living with HIV

5 of 24

Dual Regimens among Children and Adolescents

  • DANCE Study

    • Among Naïve adolescents: Preliminary results at IAS 2023

  • D3 (PENTA 21)

    • Among ART experienced children and Adolescents: Ongoing

6 of 24

DANCE [NCT03682848]

Safety and Efficacy of Dolutegravir/Lamivudine (DTG/3TC) in Therapy-naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Infected Adolescents

Puthanakit T et al, IAS 2023

7 of 24

Weeks

0

1*

4

8

12

16

24

36

48

60

72

84

96

108

120

132

144

  • ART-naïve
  • ≥12 to <18 years of age
  • Plasma HIV-1 RNA 1,000 to 500,000 c/mL
  • Weighing ≥40 kg
  • Meet all other inclusion and no exclusion criteria

[N=30]

Follow up on DTG/3TC FDC tablet (50mg/300mg) administered once daily

Treatment Phase

Primary Analysis

Week 48

End of Study

Final Analysis

Week 144

Enrollment

Day 1

(Baseline)

Extension Phase

DANCE Study Design: Single arm open label clinical trial

Puthanakit T et al, IAS 2023

Protocol 205861 - DANCE

8 of 24

Viral Suppression at Week 96

Puthanakit T et al, IAS 2023

Protocol 205861 - DANCE

9 of 24

Immunological response

Puthanakit T et al, IAS 2023

Protocol 205861 - DANCE

10 of 24

Safety

Puthanakit T et al, IAS 2023

Protocol 205861 - DANCE

11 of 24

DANCE Study Conclusions

  • DTG/3TC* was well tolerated, demonstrated high efficacy, and a high resistance barrier in ART naïve adolescents

  • Results and adult data support use of DTG/3TC as a 1st line ART^ option in adolescents

Puthanakit T et al, IAS 2023

*DTG/3TC – dolutegravir/ lamivudine; ^ART – antiretroviral therapy

12 of 24

D3 (PENTA 21) [NCT 04337450]

A randomised non-inferiority trial with nested PK to assess DTG/3TC fixed dose formulations for the maintenance of virological suppression in children with HIV infection aged 2 to <15 years

13 of 24

D3 Study design

2 to <15 years old,

virologically suppressed on first-line ART,

(N = 370)

DTG/3TC

(N=185)

DTG + 2 NRTIs (control arm)

(N=185)

RANDOMISATION 1:1

PK SUBSTUDIES in children on DTG/3TC

  • Intensive PK and PD with full PK curves at steady state in weight band groups using WHO weight band-aligned dosing
  • Population PK with sparse PK samples

Follow-up: Study visits at weeks 4, 12; then 12 weekly until the last patient reaches 96 weeks

Primary outcome measure: Confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥50 c/mL by 96 weeks

 

 

14 of 24

Long Acting Injectables: Cabotegravir/rilpivirine

15 of 24

Ongoing research on CAB+RPV in LMIC*

*LMIC – Low and middle income countries

16 of 24

Ongoing research: The LATA Trial

17 of 24

Options for 2nd line ART: The CHAPAS-4 trial

  • NRTI backbone randomisation:
    • TAF/FTC OD
    • abacavir (ABC) or zidovudine (ZDV) with lamivudine (3TC) (standard-of-care, SOC)
  • Anchor drug randomisation:
    • Dolutegravir (DTG) OD,
    • darunavir (DRV/r*) OD
    • atazanavir (ATZ/r*) OD
    • lopinavir (LPV/r*) BD
  • All dosed according to WHO weight-bands
  • PK and toxicity sub-studies

*ritonavir - 100mg & 25mg tabs

Trial Drugs

Trial design: Factorial 4X2 open label

Musiime V et al. IAS 2023. abstract - OALBB0503

18 of 24

Sites and Population

n (%) or median (IQR)

Male

497 (54%)

Age (years)

10 (8, 13)

WHO stage

1/2

778  (85%)

3/4

141 (15%)

CD4 (cells/mm3) (n=906)

669 (413, 971)

VL (copies/ml)

17 573 (5 549, 55 700)

Weight-for-age

-1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)

Height-for-age

-1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)

BMI-for-age

-1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)

1st-line NRTI ABC 53% ZDV 47%

1st-line NNRTI EFV 56% NVP 44%

Years on 1st-line ART

5.6 (3.3, 7.8)

Characteristics (n=919)

Trial sites and partners

  • Uganda: JCRC Kampala, JCRC Mbarara
  • Zambia: UTH, ADCH
  • Zimbabwe: UZCRC, Mpilo Hospital
  • Project coordination: UZCRC
  • Trial coordination and communication: MRC CTU at UCL
  • Other partners: Radboud University, University of Cape Town, York University

19 of 24

Viral Load < 400 copies/ml(primary endpoint)

NRTI backbone

Anchor drug

  • VL suppression was high in all arms

*VL – viral load

20 of 24

Adverse events: NRTI backbone

  • Low rates of AEs overall
  • No evidence of difference between ABC or ZDV (SOC) and TAF

* Week 12; treatment-unrelated; primary cause: hypotension/shock/toxic shock (secondary: severe malnutrition; candidiasis of oesophagus, trachea, bronchi or lungs)

 

ABC or ZDV (SOC) N=461

TAF N=458

Patients (% of patients) Events

Patients (% of patients) Events

ART-modifying (p=0.84)�(any grade)

12 (2.6%) 21

11 (2.4%) 19

Grade 3/4 (p=0.93)

64 (13.9%) 92

63 (13.8%) 81

SAE (p=0.84)

14 (3.0%) 14

15 (3.3%) 17

Hospitalisation

13 (2.8%) 13

14 (3.1%) 16

Death

0 (0.0%)

1* (0.2%)

21 of 24

Adverse events: Anchor drug

  • More grade 3/4 AEs, mostly hyperbilirubinemia, occurred for ATV/r vs. LPV/r
  • DTG fewer grade 3/4 AEs vs. LPV/r
  • No evidence of difference for ART-modifying events or SAEs

† ATV/r vs. LPV/r p<0.0001; DRV/r vs. LPV/r p=0.31; DTG vs. LPV/r p=0.02

* Week 12; treatment-unrelated

 

LPV/r N=227

ATV/r N=231

DRV/r N=232

DTG N=229

Patients(% of patients) Events

Patients (% of patients) Events

Patients (% of patients) Events

Patients (% of patients) Events

ART-modifying(p>0.3)

7 (3.1%) 11

5 (2.2%) 11

4 (1.7%) 8

7 (3.1%) 10

Grade 3/4

26 (11.5%) 35

69 (29.9%) 92

20 (8.6%) 28

12 (5.2%) 18

Raised bilirubin

1 (0.4%) 1

57 (24.7%) 66

1 (0.4%) 1

0 (0.0%) 0

SAE (p>0.1)

10 (4.4%) 10

5 (2.2%) 6

8 (3.4%) 9

6 (2.6%) 6

Death

0 (0.0%) 0

0 (0.0%) 0

0 (0.0%) 0

1* (0.4%) 1

Hospitalisation

9 (4.0%) 9

5 (2.2%) 6

8 (3.4%) 9

5 (2.5%) 5

22 of 24

CHAPAS – 4 conclusions

  • TAF/FTC and DTG were virologically superior to ABC/3TC or ZDV/3TC (SOC) backbone and comparators (ATV/r, LPV/r) respectively, with a favourable safety profile
  • There was a trend to DRV/r being superior to ATV/r & LPV/r
  • TAF/FTC, DTG, DRV/r had favourable safety profiles
  • Child-friendly fixed-dose combinations of TAF/FTC (+DTG or DRV/r or ATV/r) would increase access to safe, effective second-line ART options for children

23 of 24

Summary

  • Great steps taken to optimize antiretroviral therapy for children and adolescents
    • Dual regimens and long term injectables provide opportunities for prolonged care

  • The CHAPAS 4 results provide opportunities for FDC of TAF, DTG and DRV/r for 2nd line ART and support their inclusion on the WHO PADO* 5 priority list

*PADO -Paediatric Antiretroviral Drug Optimization

24 of 24

Acknowledgements

  • Alasdair Bamford, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK

  • Ivan Mambule, Joint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda