The science of climate change
Daniel J. Jacob
Vasco McCoy Family Professor of Atmospheric Chemistry and Environmental Engineering
School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Dept. of Earth & Planetary Sciences
Harvard University
Part 1: The drivers of climate change
Part 2: The impacts of climate change
THE EARTH’S CLIMATE IN EQUILIBRIUM:�BALANCE BETWEEN INCOMING AND OUTGOING ENERGY
SOLAR
RADIATION
(visible)
28% reflected by clouds, ice,
aerosol particles… (albedo)
TERRESTRIAL
RADIATION
(infrared)
Effective temperature
TE = 255 K (-18oC, 0oF)
Emitted radiation
varies as 4th power of temperature
WARMING OF EARTH’S SURFACE BY GREENHOUSE GASES
SOLAR
RADIATION
(visible)
TERRESTRIAL
RADIATION
(infrared)
Greenhouse gases are transparent to solar radiation but absorb
terrestrial infrared radiation and re-emit it both upward and downward
28% reflected by
clouds, ice…
Water, CO2, methane are the most important greenhouse gases
Atmospheric
greenhouse gases
Effective temperature
TE = 255 K (-18oC, 0oF)
Surface temperature
To = 288 K (15oC, 59oF)
Solar
Terrestrial
visible infrared
Fin
Fout
increase greenhouse gas by ΔG
Fin
Fout
Climate equilibrium: Fin = Fout
ΔG
Radiative forcing ΔF = Fin – Fout > 0
Climate change arises from disruption of this radiative equilibrium
increase albedo by ΔA
Fin
Fout
ΔA
Radiative forcing ΔF = Fin – Fout < 0
visible infrared
visible infrared
positive radiative forcing
warming
negative radiative forcing
cooling
🢡
🢡
radiative energy fluxes
Radiative forcing of climate change drives cascade of impacts and feedbacks
Temperature response ΔTo
Physical impacts
Societal impacts
climate
feedbacks
triple ΔTo
Radiative forcing ΔF
Natural:
Human:
ΔTo ∝ ΔF
Surface temperature response
is proportional to radiative forcing
transition to new climate
…until tipping points
ΔTo = 1.5-4oC
Tipping point from the recent past: glacial-interglacial climate transitions�
glacial
glacial
glacial
glacial
Vostok ice core (East Antarctica)
Abrupt climate change driven by initial solar radiative forcing
strongly amplified by water, ice, CO2 feedbacks
current interglacial
Today: 430 ppm
The natural carbon cycle
volcanoes
erosion
atmospheric CO2
600 Pg C
land carbon
3,000 Pg C
ocean carbon
40,000 Pg C
sediment carbon
90,000,000 PgC
burial
warming drives CO2 evasion: positive feedback
1 Pg = 1x1015 g = 1 billion tons
photosynthesis
respiration
fires
dissolution evasion
Increase in atmospheric CO2 from fossil fuel combustion
IPCC AR6; https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends
CO2 , parts per million (ppm)
May 2024: 427 ppm
growth rate: 3 ppm per year
50% of added CO2 stays in atmosphere; rest is taken up by land (25%) and oceans (25%)
2023 emissions:
10 Pg C per year
Increase in atmospheric CO2
= 5 Pg C per year
volcanoes
erosion
atmospheric CO2
600 Pg C
land carbon
3000 Pg C +130
ocean carbon
40,000 Pg C
sediment carbon
90,000,000 PgC
burial
fossil fuel combustion
(x50)
~ 200 years
to take up CO2
+ 260
+ 130
Perturbation of carbon cycle by fossil fuel combustion
Increase in carbon reservoirs since preindustrial time
Tipping point from the recent past: glacial-interglacial climate transitions�
glacial
glacial
glacial
glacial
Vostok ice core (East Antarctica)
Abrupt climate change driven by initial solar radiative forcing
strongly amplified by water, ice, CO2 feedbacks
current interglacial
Today: 430 ppm
Acidification of the ocean from increasing CO2
CO2
H2CO3
HCO3_ + H+
Air
Ocean
Acidification of the ocean endangers marine biosphere by making it more difficult to form calcium carbonate shells
Change in ocean pH since preindustrial
WMO (2022), GLODAP
0.1 pH decrease
means 26% acidity increase
Methane is a major greenhouse gas… but where does it come from?
Methane: another major greenhouse gas
Wetlands: 100-220 Tg/yr
Livestock: 90-140
Oil/gas: 40-80
Waste: 50-80
Rice: 20-40
Coal mines: 20-60
Pre-industrial: 650 ppb
Present: 1930 ppb
Atmospheric lifetime: 9 years
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5): major component of air pollution
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth
cools the Earth by reflecting solar radiation
combustion
industry
dust
aerosol particles (0.01-10 μm)
relative humidity
>100%
cloud droplets condense on particles
solar radiation
US air quality standard
Radiative forcing since pre-industrial time and temperature response
IPCC AR6
Radiative forcing (W m-2)
Temperature response (oC)
radiative forcing from 1750 to 2019
surface temperature response
The agents of climate change
+1.2oC
CO2 (100+years)
methane
(9 years)
others
(~100 years)
aerosol
particles
(1 week)
Observed rise in global mean surface temperature
Warming from methane includes additional contributions from ozone, water, and CO2 when methane is oxidized in atmosphere
IPCC projections of CO2 emissions and resulting temperature
business-as-usual
aggressive decarbonization
+4.4oC relative to 1850-1900
+1.4oC
IPCC AR6
+1.6oC
+2.4oC
CO2 emission (GtCO2/year)
Recent trends in CO2 emissions
GtCO2/year
IEA [2024]
1st IPCC report
Kyoto protocol
Paris agreement
2023:
+1.1%
2022-2023 increase is driven by global South; coal combustion accounts for 65%
PM2.5 air quality may be major driver of decarbonization in global South�
…but this will offset the near-term benefit
of CO2 decreases
State of the Air, 2020; Zhai et al., 2019
Annual mean PM2.5 in China
2013
2018
action to decrease PM2.5
Projected temperature responses from aggressive 1.5oC decarbonization scenarios relative to constant emissions
Decreasing aerosol delays improvement until 2050
Shindell and Smith [2019]
No improvement until 2050
relative to constant emission scenario
Increasing attention to methane in climate policy
Biden at COP26 announcing Global Methane Pledge, now signed by 150 countries
“One of the most important things we can do to keep 1.5 degrees in reach is to reduce methane emissions as quickly as possible…it amounts to half the warming we’re experiencing today…We collectively commit to reduce our methane emissions by 30% by 2030 and I think we can go beyond that”
Why the importance of methane for staying below 1.5oC of danger?
+1.2oC
CO2 (100+years)
methane
(9 years)
others
(~100 years)
aerosol
particles
(1 week)
Observed rise in global mean surface temperature
Effect of zeroing out methane emissions
Observed rise in global mean surface temperature
+0.7oC
Warming decreases by 40%
CO2 (100+years)
others
(~100 years)
aerosols
(1 week)
buys us time as we work to decarbonize the economy
Decreasing methane would also improve ozone air quality
with benefits for public health, crops, natural vegetation … and CO2
Simple measures can go a long way, there is no stockage problem like for CO2
fix leaks, venting practices
flare excess gas
…or use it
recover gas from landfills
digest gas from manure ponds,
wastewater plants
change rice practices
Decreasing methane emissions should be easy
change cattle feed
…but problem is that methane comes from a zillion �of individually small point sources with highly variable emissions
oil field in California
I’m leaking!
I’m venting!
My flare went out!
Satellite observations can tell us where methane is coming from
Over 100 million observations per year
Balasus et al., 2023
…and most is coming from the Global South
TROPOMI satellite observations of atmospheric methane, 2021
coal
livestock
landfills
rice
livestock
landfills
rice
wetlands
livestock
rice
oil/gas
livestock
wetlands
landfills
livestock
landfills
oil/gas
oil/gas
Top ten methane emitting countries [Tg/year]
Qu et al., ACP 2021
Chen et al., ACP 2022
Nesser et al., ACP 2024
*
did not sign the Global Methane Pledge
*
*
livestock
rice
gas
coal
waste
oil
from inversions of GOSAT and TROPOMI satellite data
Satellites can observe large methane plumes �to enable immediate climate action
Pipeline
Pipeline blocking valve in Mexico
Q = 300 tons h-1, 3-h duration
Watine-Guiu et al. [2023]
EELL pipeline from Chihuaha to Durango
supplying Permian gas to Mexico
blocking valve
geostationary orbit
Targeting methane emissions cannot be a substitute for CO2… �because it does not address long-term climate change
Response after 10 years
Response after 100 years
Warming response after 1-year pulse of present-day emissions (IPCC AR6)
CO2 CH4
Methane is still a powerful lever for near-term climate action�…while we decrease CO2 emissions and develop carbon capture technologies
CO2 emission decrease to near zero
Time
Climate risks
CO2 emission decrease
+ carbon capture
Business as usual
CO2 emission decrease
+ carbon capture
+ methane emission decrease
Start of climate action
(+solar geoengineering?)
Solar geoengineering
Science for SAI is OK but only as stopgap while we aggressively decrease CO2
- it does not address ocean acidification
- it would cause catastrophic warming if used for decades then stopped suddenly
Part 2: The impacts of climate change
How to observe climate change
Paleorecords:
ice cores, tree rings, sediments
Long-term surface stations:
weather, gages, cruises
Earth-observing satellites:
atmosphere, (sub)surface
Many climate variables:
How to model climate change: Earth system models (ESMs)
supercomputer
interpretation
projections
what-if scenarios
A small rise in mean temperature �means disproportionally more heat extremes
Temperature
Probability of occurrence
heat waves
average
Small change in average temperature
Large increase in heat waves
New extremes are reached
cold waves
Large decrease in cold waves
Extreme wet bulb temperature (TW) as dangerous threshold
extremely
hazardous
death in 6 hours
Raymond et al., Sci. Adv. 2020
T increase
TW is the temperature of air if you evaporated as much water in it as you could
Warming causes more intense rain events
Temperature [K]
Saturation water vapor pressure [hPa]
water vapor air capacity
Increases exponentially
with temperature
Precipitation trend 1901-2019
At the same time, droughts are expected to get worse
- higher water evaporation not offset by precipitation
- diminished snowpack
- higher runoff from more extreme rain events
higher
precipitation
higher evaporation
Regions of worsening drought
due to climate change (IPCC AR6)
Land surface
Heat and drought have driven increased wildfires in western US
Annual area burned in forests in the western US
Abatzoglou et al. (2021)
New York City, June 7, 2023
Trends in smoky days, 2011-2020
It’s warming everywhere – but most so in the Arctic
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp
Warming of Arctic slows down winds in the northern hemisphere
HOT
COLD
COLD
trade winds
westerlies
Equator
30o
30o
N Pole
S Pole
Rapid loss in summertime Arctic sea ice
March 2022 September 2022
% change relative to 1991-2020 average
March
September
https://arctic.noaa.gov/; IPCC AR6
Melting of Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets
Total Antarctic ice mass: 30 million Gigatons (Gt) Total Greenland ice mass: 3 million Gt
Measured by high-resolution gravity data
from NASA GRACE satellite
Mean sea level rise
2010-2017 loss of ice
IPCC AR6
thermal expansion
global mean sea level
20 cm since 1900;
recent acceleration driven by melting of glaciers, Greenland
Projections of future sea-level rise
IPCC AR6
Concern over possible collapse of Western Antarctic Ice Sheet
Very obvious impacts of sea-level rise
Islands, low-lying areas become uninhabitable
4.9 million in US live less than 4ft above sea level
Kiribati
Hurricanes, coastal storms cause more damage
Weakening of Gulf Stream, increased ocean stratification
IPCC AR6
Heavy (cold and salty) water sinks to bottom of ocean, driving ocean circulation
The Earth has had many different stable climates over its history
Snowball Earth (700 million years ago)
Eocene (35 million years ago)
Cretaceous (100 million years ago)
Last glacial climate (20 thousand years ago)
How to switch from one stable climate to another
ENERGY
TEMPERATURE
Stable climate 1
Stable climate 2
Stable climate 3
Perturbation
variabilité
interannuelle
negative
feedback
positive
feedback
tipping point
Can be large and abrupt but reversible
Irreversible but can be slow
(100-10,000 yr)
CO2 over past 60 million years:�highly correlated with climate transitions
IPCC AR6
Current estimates of climate tipping points
Armstrong McKay et al. [2022]