PROSTATE CANCER PANEL
1
#UROMIGOSLIVE
Prostate Cancer Panel
Neeraj Agarwal, MD�Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah
Rana McKay, MD�UC San Diego Health
Michael Morris, MD�Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Tanya Dorff, MD�City of Hope
2
#UROMIGOSLIVE
Where Do We Stand With PARPs?
3
#UROMIGOSLIVE
4
#UROMIGOSLIVE
5
#UROMIGOSLIVE
Clinical trials of ARSIs plus PARPis
6
#UROMIGOSLIVE
Saad, et al. NEJM Evidence. 2022; Chi K, et al. JCO. 2023; Agarwal N, et al. Lancet. 2023.
| PROpel (olaparib) | MAGNITUDE (niraparib) | TALAPRO-2 (talazoparib) |
Prior NHT in mCSPC | Yes after 12 months of interruption (no abiraterone) | Yes (except abiraterone) | Yes (abiraterone only) |
Prior docetaxel in mCSPC | Yes | Yes | Yes |
HRR analysis | Tissue or ctDNA / retrospective | 100% tissue / prospective | 100% tissue / prospective |
Primary end point | rPFS (investigator review) | rPFS (central review) | rPFS (central review) |
| rPFS, HR (95% CI) | ||
All comers | HR, 0.66 (0.54-0.81) | NR | HR, 0.63 (0.51-0.78) |
HRR-negative | HR, 0.76 (0.60-0.97) | HR, 1.09 (0.75-1.59) | HR, 0.66 (0.49-0.91) |
HRR-positive | HR, 0.50 (0.34-0.73) | HR, 0.73 (0.56-0.96) | HR, 0.45 (0.33-0.61) |
BRCA+ | HR, 0.23 (0.12-0.43) | HR, 0.53 (0.36-0.79) | HR, 0.20 (0.11-0.36) |
ORR (all comers) | 58% vs 48% | 60% vs 28% (HRR+ patients only) | 62% vs 44% |
OS (all comers) | HR, 0.81 (0.67-1.00); P=.054 | HR, 0.79 (0.55-1.12); P=.18 | HR, 0.89 (0.69-1.14); P=0.35 |
Regulatory status | BRCA only (FDA) / mCRPC (EMA) | BRCA (FDA and EMA) | Any HRR (FDA) / pending (EMA) |
Phase 3 combination trials of PARP inhibitors with novel hormonal therapy (NHT)
Adapted from slide courtesy of Neeraj Agarwal
7
#UROMIGOSLIVE
Chana Weinstock, MD, FDA, ODAC, April 28, 2023
“We would consider this trial design to be inappropriate today, given emerging data on the strength of BRCA mutations as predictive biomarkers. BRCA status should have been prospectively evaluated, with efficacy results evaluated separately…with stratification or by separate cohorts. This is a significant design flaw…�we would be rewarding poor trial design if we disregarded this issue.”
8
#UROMIGOSLIVE
FDA, ODAC, April 28, 2023
9
#UROMIGOSLIVE
LIVE PODCAST:
Current and Future Status
of Radioligand Therapy
10
#UROMIGOSLIVE
Prostate Cancer Panel
Neeraj Agarwal, MD�Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah
Rana McKay, MD�UC San Diego Health
Michael Morris, MD�Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Tanya Dorff, MD�City of Hope
11
#UROMIGOSLIVE
VISION: Primary and secondary end points
38% reduction in risk of death
50% reduction in risk of SSE
60% reduction in risk of progression or death
9% CR and 42% PR rate
SSE, symptomatic skeletal event.
1. Morris MJ, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(18_suppl):LBA4. 2. Sartor O, et al. New Engl J Med. 2021;385:1091-1103. 3. Fizazi, et al. ESMO 2021.
12
#UROMIGOSLIVE
Current practice patterns
Patients selected by PSMA scan results
Six doses of drug administered every 6 weeks regardless of response
No dosimetry
No follow-up with PSMA scans
Treatment terminated by PD on standard scans, but no definition of response
Do any of these actually make sense?
13
#UROMIGOSLIVE
What is the right way to dose 177Lu-PSMA?
14
#UROMIGOSLIVE
PSMAfore: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study
177Lu-PSMA-617
7.4 GBq (200 mCi) ± 10%
Once every 6 weeks for 6 cycles
ARPI change
abiraterone or enzalutamide
1:1
rPFS by BICR
Follow-up
Stratification factors
Crossover allowed upon radiographic progression by BICR
Eligible adults
Sartor, et al. ESMO 2023.
15
#UROMIGOSLIVE
rPFS and other end points
| 177Lu-PSMA-617 �(n=234) | ARPI change �(n=234) |
Events, n | 115 (49.1%) | 168 (71.8%) |
Median rPFS �(95% CI) | 12.02 months (9.30, 14.42) | 5.59 months (4.17, 5.95) |
PSA50: 58% vs 20%
Primary HR: 0.41 (95%CI:0.29, 0.56); p < 0.0001
Updated HR: 0.43 (95%CI:0.33, 0.54)
16
#UROMIGOSLIVE
Overall survival (note 84% crossover)
Crossover adjusted
ITT
17
#UROMIGOSLIVE
18
#UROMIGOSLIVE
PSMA-directed RLT may have multiple products in multiple indications �within the next several years
Clinically
localized
disease
Clinical
metastases:
Sensitive to
ADT
Metastatic
disease
treatment:
Second line
Metastatic
disease
treatment:
Fourth line
Metastatic
disease
treatment:
Third line
Rising
PSA
Non-�metastatic
Metastatic
disease
treatment:
First line
PSMA addition
(vipivotide tetraxetan)
PSMAfore (vipivotide tetraxetan)
SPLASH (PNT2002)
ECLIPSE (Lu-177-PSMA I&T))
VISION (vipivotide tetraxetan)
Scher, Morris, et al. JCO. 2016.
19
#UROMIGOSLIVE
Trial | ClinicalTrials.gov | Phase | N | Regimen |
mHSPC | ||||
UpFrontPSMA | NCT04343885 | II | 140 | Doce +/− Lu |
mCRPC, first line | ||||
BULLSEYE, oligomets | NCT04443062 | II | 58 | Lu-PSMA-617 vs ADT |
ENZA-p | NCT04419402 | II | 160 | Enza +/− Lu |
Alpha/Bet | NCT05383079 | I | 36 | Ra/Lu |
mCRPC, second line | ||||
LuPARP | NCT03874884 | I | 52 | Lu/olaparib |
PRINCE | NCT03658447 | I/II | 37 | Lu/pembro |
ARROW | NCT03939689 | II | 120 | Enza +/− MIP 1095 I-131 |
ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; ARSI, androgen receptor signaling inhibitor; mCRPC, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; mCSPC, metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer; RLT, radioligand therapy.
PSMA-based radioligand combination therapies
20
#UROMIGOSLIVE
PSMA-directed alpha therapeutics: A long time coming
Chakravarty, et al. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018.
Agent | Sponsor | Phase | Targeting Type | ClinicalTrials.gov |
CONVO1-alpha (Ac-225) | Convergent | I/II | Antibody | NCT03276572 |
Cu-64 TLX592 | Telix | I (Cupid) | Antibody | NCT04726033 |
Ac-225 PSMA617 | Novartis | I | Small molecule | NCT04597411 |
Ac-225 PSMA I&T | Fusion | II | Small molecule | NCT05219500 |
New radioligand targets: hK2, STEAP family, DLL3
21
#UROMIGOSLIVE