1 of 37

Data Practices Update

Data Practices Office

Ellen Jaquette

Casey Carmody

2 of 37

We are a statewide resource

  • Data Practices Office
    • Informal advice/technical assistance
    • Commissioner of Administration advisory opinions
    • Website and info pages: https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/
    • Listserv and newsletters
    • Legislative assistance
    • Training

3 of 37

Agenda

  • Data Practices Overview
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Data Practices Updates
  • Questions

4 of 37

Data Practices Overview

5 of 37

Minnesota Government Data Practices Act

  • Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13
    • Presumes government data are public
    • Classifies data that are not public
    • Provides rights for the public and data subjects
    • Requires that data on individuals be accurate, complete, current, and secure
  • Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1205
  • Does not apply to legislative or judicial branches, or to non-metro townships

6 of 37

Government data defined

“All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated by any government entity regardless of its physical form, storage media or conditions of use.”

(Minn. Stat. § 13.02, subd. 7)

7 of 37

Official records vs. government data

Government data

Official records (Subject to records retention schedule)

8 of 37

Maintaining government data

  • No requirement to maintain data in a particular format or organization system
  • However…
    • Data must be “easily accessible for convenient use”

9 of 37

Government data

Data on individuals

Data not on individuals

Data that identify someone

  • Employee’s telephone number
  • Name and address of adult arrestee
  • Athlete of the week photograph

Data that do not identify someone

  • Makes and models of fleet trucks
  • Names of companies that are preferred vendors
  • List of government websites

10 of 37

Classification of government data

Classification

Meaning of classification

Examples

Public

Available to anyone for any reason

Employee name & salary

Private/

Nonpublic

Available to:

  • Data subject
  • Those in the entity whose work assignment requires access
  • Entities authorized by law
  • Those authorized by data subject

Employee home address & home phone number

Confidential/Protected nonpublic

Available to:

  • Those in the entity whose work assignment requires access
  • Entities authorized by law

Not available to the data subject

Data collected as part of an active civil legal action

11 of 37

Responding to Data Requests

Data Subject

Member of the Public

Data access

Public or Private data about themself

Public data

Time to respond

10 business days

A reasonable amount of time

Cost to inspect data

Free

Free

Cost for copies of data

“Actual Cost”

< 100 pages = 25¢/page, >100 pages/electronic = “actual cost”

12 of 37

Responding to Data Requests

  • If you redact or withhold data in response to a request, you must provide the statutory basis for denying access
  • Entities are not required to respond to questions under the DPA
    • Exception: upon request, entity must explain meaning of data (abbreviations, technical terms, etc.) Minn. Stat. 13.03 Subd. 3(a)
  • Entities are not required to create data under the DPA
    • Summary data exception (Minn. Stat. sec. 13.05 subd. 7)

13 of 37

Entity Obligations

  • Responsible Authority and Data Practices Compliance Official

(Minn Stat. sec. 13.02 subd. 16; 13.05 subd. 13)

  • Data Inventory, Policies, and Procedures

(Minn. Stat. sec. 13.025; 13.03)

  • Limits on collecting data

(Minn. Stat. sec. 13.05 subd. 3)

  • Protect data

(Minn. Stat. sec. 13.05 subd. 5)

  • Provide notice when collecting not public data from individuals

(Minn. Stat. sec. 13.04 subd. 2)

14 of 37

Penalties and Remedies

  • Remedies (Minn. Stat. §13.08)
    • Action for damages, costs, and attorneys fees
    • Action to compel compliance
  • Administrative remedy (Minn. Stat. §13.085)
    • Administrative hearing within 2 years of alleged violation
    • Action to compel compliance
  • Penalties (Minn. Stat. §13.09)
    • Willful violation or knowing unauthorized acquisition of not public data = misdemeanor
    • Dismissal or suspension
  • Advisory opinions (Minn. Stat. §13.072)

15 of 37

Frequently Asked Questions

16 of 37

FAQ: Large Requests

A member of the public contacted us and asked for all reports and complaints from the last fifty years.

Do we have to respond?

17 of 37

FAQ: Large Requests Answer

Government entities are required to respond to data requests.

There is no exception in the Data Practices Act for burdensome or harassing requests.

  • Webster v. Hennepin County, 910 NW 2d 420 (Minn. 2018)
  • Advisory Opinion 22-001

18 of 37

FAQ: Large Request Tips

  • Practical considerations:
    • Be prepared for the large requests via good records management
    • Ensure your policies and practices are current
    • Contact the requester to clarify the scope of the request
    • Give context to the length of time it may take to compile data and amount of responsive data
    • Provide estimates of copy costs
    • Ask whether certain responsive data should be prioritized
    • Consider providing data on a rolling basis

19 of 37

FAQ: “Vexatious” requesters

“We’ve been dealing with a requester who <insert issue>. Do we have to respond to this person?”

Issues

    • Submits a new or additional requests as soon as city responds
    • Constantly emails city for updates
    • Doesn’t believe city has provided all data
    • Is harassing or is threatening toward city staff

20 of 37

FAQ: “Vexatious” requesters answers

The Data Practices Act does not have mechanisms to deny responding to requesters

    • Response time is “appropriate and prompt” and “within a reasonable time” for requests from public

Practical considerations:

    • Consider more communication rather than less (if possible)
    • Document issues and track time working on requests
    • Proactively provide data via website
    • Ensure key staff are trained on data practices and have primary contact person for requests

21 of 37

FAQ: “Vexatious” requesters (cont.)

Written data access policies (section 13.025) can also help manage requesters

Include provisions on:

    • How to make a request & sample request form
    • The district’s procedures when processing a requests
    • “Abandoned” requests
    • Copy costs
    • Contact information for Data Practices Compliance Official

Make sure these policies are publicly available!

22 of 37

FAQ: “Vexatious” requesters (cont.)

The Data Practices Act does not contain exceptions for “harassing” requesters but consider procedures

Advisory Opinion 22-001

    • “[I]t is not within the Commissioner’s authority to determine whether particular behavior is harassing”
    • “However, these limitations – and the requirements of Chapter 13, generally – do not mean that government entities and their staff must tolerate threatening behavior from data requesters. All entities have discretion to determine how best to insulate employees from overt acts of harassment or hostility.”
    • “In developing these procedures, government entities may consider their respectful workplace policies and obligations to employees to prohibit harassment or other hostile and threatening acts.”

23 of 37

FAQ: Classification of Data Requests

What is the classification of a data request?

24 of 37

FAQ: Classification of Data Requests Answer

Data requests are presumptively public and available to public requesters.

However, if the data request was for data classified as private, the data request may also have a private classification.

25 of 37

FAQ: Social Media

A requester asked for all posts and comments from our Facebook page for the past year.

Are social media posts government data?

26 of 37

FAQ: Social Media Answer

It depends. If the account is being used for official government purposes, then the posts are government data and must be provided in response to a request.

But consider:

  • Who operates the account?
  • Do the posts collect, create, receive, or disseminate data from the government entity?
  • Advisory Opinion 19-001

27 of 37

Data Practices Updates

28 of 37

New Advisory Opinions

Advisory Opinion 22-001

    • Large requests and harassing requesters
    • Requirement to provide data to data subject within 10 business days of request

Advisory Opinion 22-005

    • Public personnel data and discipline and arbitration under collective bargaining agreements

29 of 37

New Advisory Opinions

Advisory Opinion 22-006

    • Contracts with private organizations still create government data

Advisory Opinion 22-007

    • Scope of Minn. Stat. 13.393 and government attorney data

30 of 37

Case Law

Energy Policy Advocates v. Ellison

980 N.W. 2d 146 (Minn. 2022); A20-1344

    • Recognized common interest doctrine in MN
    • Held that data classified as private data on individuals in Minn. Stat. 13.65 includes data not on individuals
      • Limited to Attorney General Data in 13.65 only

31 of 37

DPO Proposals

  • HF 1750: Changes to data challenge appeals process in 13.04 Subd. 4
    • Allows dismissal of appeal prior to informal resolution in specific circumstances
    • Pulls forward some requirements from the Rules
  • Remove $200 fee for OML opinions

32 of 37

Bills Under Consideration

  • HF4/SF27: “Driver’s Licenses for All”
    • Limitations on disclosure and use of data collected in relation to noncompliant licenses
    • Classifies immigration status as private data and limits disclosure
  • HF 34/SF1657: Local government license data
    • Classifies specific tax and bank account data collected by political subdivisions as private/nonpublic
    • Requires classified data to be destroyed within 90 days

33 of 37

Bills Under Consideration

  • HF822/SF427: POST Board data sharing
    • Requires local law enforcement agencies to disclose data to POST board in relation to misconduct allegations
  • HF1833/SF1888: Use-of-force video data
    • Requires law enforcement agency to publicly disclose body camera and dashboard camera data of incident where officer uses deadly force within 14 days

34 of 37

Bills Under Consideration

  • HF100/SF73 – Omnibus cannabis bill
    • Office of Cannabis Management – license application data is classified as private/nonpublic until license issued; then data are public
    • Cannabis Expungement Board – identifying data on victims and individuals whose convictions are reviewed are private
    • Automatic expungement of criminal records related to certain marijuana offenses (records are sealed)

35 of 37

Rulemaking

Sign up for rulemaking updates!

https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/rulemaking/

36 of 37

What questions do you have for us?

37 of 37

Stay in touch

Data Practices Office

651-296-6733

info.dpo@state.mn.us

https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/

Twitter: @mngovdata

YouTube training videos: https://www.youtube.com/user/INFOIPAD