7.9c: The economic costs of maintaining global military power (naval, nuclear, air power, intelligence services) and space exploration are questioned in some existing superpowers.
Superpowers & Space �Notes from ‘The Future of Geography’, Tim Marshall, 2023
We must remember that the history of space exploration has always been about superpowers. ��‘It was conflict on earth that finally got us there. The technology that took us to the heavens came from the arms race of the Cold War’. (p.27)
China Vs America? | |
America | China |
As of early 2023 there were roughly 4900 active satellites in orbit; almost 3000 of them American and about 500 of them Chinese. | Each year this century China has increased the number of engineers who graduate whilst in the USA there has been a year on year decrease. |
In the 1960s NASA’s annual expenditure was 4% of government spending. Today is is roughly 0.5%. However, the US encourages privately funded space exploration. In 2010 SpaceX became the first private company to launch, operate and recover a spacecraft. | China intends to launch at least 1000 satellites over the next decade. It will increasingly offer its services to developing countries that cannot afford to launch rockets or have satellites of their own. |
Americans have debated whether or not to go back to the moon ever since the last human landing in 1972. In a poll, the majority of Americans believe China is a ‘major threat’ to US leadership in space and want to maintain US dominance. In 2021 only 24% of respondents said that NASA’s budget was too high. | The debate of whether or not go get to the moon is absent in China where it is taken as a given that space exploration is a vital part of national development. Xi Jinping has declared that his country plans to overall all nations and become the leading space power by 2024. |
Thinking synoptically about superpowers and space
Where does Russia fit in? |
|
‘The ability of the USA to project military power today is based almost entirely on space support. This includes precision guidance, intelligence and surveillance and the political will to act that comes from the illusion of perfect knowledge of enemy deployments and intentions.’ (p.200)