1 of 40

Providing Legal Services �to Members of LGBTQ Communities�

Talia Yasmeen Guerriero, Esq.

Albies, Stark & Guerriero

talia@albiesstark.com

2 of 40

Objectives

PART 1:

Terminology, Implicit Bias, and Microaggressions

PART 2:

Application to our offices, work with clients, & in the courtroom

3 of 40

LGBTQIA2S+:  ��- Lesbian �- Gay�- Bisexual �- Transgender �- Queer �- Intersex�- Asexual or agender�- Two-spirit

4 of 40

Gender BinaryA social system and/or cultural belief related to the classification of gender into two distinct, opposite forms of masculine and feminine, and the social assignment of associated traits. ��Gender Spectrum: The reality that there is a range of gender identities between and outside of the categories of male and female.

 

5 of 40

 

6 of 40

Cisgender: a person whose sense of personal identity and gender corresponds with their sex assigned at birth.

Non-Binary: An adjective describing a person who does not identify exclusively as a woman or a man. They may identify as both, somewhere in between, or outside the categories of a “woman” and a “man.”

They/Them: An increasingly used set of pronouns that dissociate sex/gender from referencing an individual person.

7 of 40

Assigned Name: Name assigned to a person at birth and with which which they may or may not identify.

Deadname: Deadnaming occurs when someone refers to a transgender or nonbinary person by the name they used before they transitioned.

8 of 40

Intersectionality

The overlapping or intersecting social identities and related systems of oppression, domination, and discrimination.

How do various biological, social and cultural constructs such as gender, race, class, ability, sexual orientation, religion, age, nationality, and other sectarian axes of identity interact on multiple and often simultaneous levels?

9 of 40

Microaggressions:�What Does This Mean?

Everyday verbal, nonverbal, and environmental slights, snubs, or insults, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative messages to target persons based solely upon their marginalized group membership.

10 of 40

Microaggressions:�What is the effect?

    • Increases experiences of “imposter syndrome”
    • Increases isolation (fewer models, less institutional support)
    • Increases minority stress/exposure to micro-aggressions
    • Increases feelings of not-belonging

11 of 40

Potentially Microaggressive

    • “What does your husband do?”

12 of 40

Re-phrase

  • “What does your husband do?”

“Do you have a spouse? What does your spouse do?”

13 of 40

Potentially Microaggressive

    • “Do you have a boy or a girl?”

14 of 40

Re-phrase

  • “Do you have a boy or a girl?”

“How does your kid identify?” Or “What pronouns does your kid use?”

15 of 40

Potentially Microaggressive

    • “Are your pronouns he, she or they?”

16 of 40

Re-phrase

  • “Are your pronouns he, she or they?”

“My pronouns are he/him/his.”

If not volunteered, maybe ask “what pronouns would you like me to use for you?”

17 of 40

Potentially Microaggressive

    • After accidentally using she/her instead of they/them:

“Sorry, using ‘they/them’ is so hard in the singular” or “it’s so hard cause it’s just not grammatically correct”

18 of 40

Re-phrase

  • “Sorry, using ‘they/them’ is so hard in the singular” or “it’s so hard cause it’s just not it’s not grammatically correct”

“My apologies – I’ll keep at it until I get it right”

(don’t over-apologize….

then practice “they/them” at home!)

19 of 40

Potentially Microaggressive

    • “I’m supportive of my cousin’s gay lifestyle” or
    • “I’m supportive of my cousin’s choice to be gay”

20 of 40

Re-phrase

  • “I’m supportive of my cousin’s gay lifestyle” or “I’m supportive of my cousin’s choice to be gay”

“I’m proud of my cousin’s gay identity”

21 of 40

Potentially Microaggressive

    • “Have you had surgery yet?”

22 of 40

Re-phrase

  • “Have you had surgery yet?”

Say nothing.

Don’t ask overly invasive questions that have no relevance to the person’s identity or your representation of them.

If you need to know for your representation, ask the person what they need to have a supportive environment for the conversation.

23 of 40

Why is POWER Important?

  • Dominant groups that establish and reify what is considered “normal” or “acceptable” can marginalize the values, aesthetics, and abilities of others.
  • Can interrupt microaggressions.

24 of 40

Application to Our Work

25 of 40

Where does it show up?

Staff in Your Office

Selecting and Working with Clients

Deciding Whether to Take a Case to Trial

Jury Selection and Voir Dire

Litigating the Case and Developing Themes

26 of 40

Use respect, privacy, & good terminology

Enforce strong anti-discrimination policy

Guidance on transition in workplace

Examine & change policies: ID, uniform, health insurance, gendered language, payroll

Don’t put burden on the person!

Bathroom assessment, signage, & policy

Groups or associations? Supportive symbols?

Staff

27 of 40

Liability for Transgender Healthcare Exclusions

28 of 40

Bathroom Signage Example

  • “You are welcome to use the restroom that best aligns with your gender identity.”

https://ofm.wa.gov/sites/default/files/public/shr/Diversity/DEIMEDIA/Inclusive-Bathroom-Signage-Recommendations_RAIN.pdf.

29 of 40

30 of 40

Clients

Write down the ways in which a person’s LGBTQ identity might be important to your practice area.

Think specifically about your intake forms or intake questions – what information is relevant to a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity?

31 of 40

Cases with no legal name change

  • Caption:

Michael Smith (a.k.a. Michelle Smith)

  • Help the client get a legal name change

32 of 40

Third Parties Disrespecting Pronouns

  • If parties, seek an order or sanction from the Court

  • If opposing counsel, cite ORPC 8.4(a)(7):

“It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to in the course of representing a client, knowingly intimidate or harass a person because of that person’s [ ] sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation [. .˘. ].”

33 of 40

Intentional Misgendering as Harassment

  • Jameson v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120130992 (May 21, 2013) (repeated intentional misuse of the employee's name and pronoun may constitute sex-based disparate treatment and harassment).

  • Lusardi v. Dep’t of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120133395 (April 1, 2015) (agency restrictions on a transgender woman’s ability to use a common female restroom facility constituted disparate treatment and complainant stated a hostile work environment claim based on those restrictions combined with offensive remarks and intentional repeated pronoun misuse)

34 of 40

Court Video and Jury Instructions on Implicit Bias (Oregon)

35 of 40

Oregon LGBTQ-related Statutes

  • ORS 174.100: Sexual orientation includes actual or perceived gender identity, regardless of whether the individual’s gender identity, appearance, expression or behavior differs from that traditionally associated with the individual’s sex at birth.
  • ORS 659A.030: non-discrimination in workplace
  • ORS 659A.403: public accommodations
  • ORS 659.850: educational settings
  • ORS 659A.421: housing

36 of 40

  • ORS 30.198: Civil action for intimidation as a result of person’s sexual orientation/gender identity

  • “Bias crime” –
    • property damage,
    • physical contact,
    • intentionally subjecting person to alarm by threatening physical injury or property damage
    • places another person in fear of imminent serious physical injury

  • Allows economic, noneconomic, and punitive damages and attorney fees and costs�

37 of 40

Sample: Multnomah County Transgender Booking Policy

38 of 40

Resources

  • http://www.genderspectrum.org/

39 of 40

Law Review Articles

  • Implicit Bias in the Courtroom - 59 UCLA L. Rev. 1124 (2012)

  • Shadowing the Bar: Attorneys' own Implicit Bias - 28 La Raza L.J. 18 (2017)

  • A Matter of Fit: The Law of Discrimination and the Science of Implicit Bias, 59 HASTINGS L.J. 1389 (2008).

40 of 40

Talia Guerriero is a plaintiff-side employment lawyer in Portland, Oregon with a background in labor and union rights that enriches her employment practice. She has always been a strong voice for the underdog with a passion for social justice and civil rights that defines her life. Her work has focused on empowering and protecting the rights of marginalized communities, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (“LGBTQ”) communities in particular. 

Talia has significant civil rights and litigation experience both in her current position with and her previous positions with Meyer Stephenson and Bennett Hartman. Her law review article on implementing effective non-discrimination policies for LGBTQ youth in foster care was published in the U.C. Davis Journal of Juvenile Law and Policy.

Talia can be reached at 503-308-4775 or talia@albiesstark.com.