1 of 29

Ferguson-Florissant

School District

Performance Based Evaluation for Certified Staff

2 of 29

Today’s Objectives

  • Define effective evaluation
  • Unpack Policy 1091: Evaluation
  • Deepen our understanding of the MEES indicators for Teachers
  • Understand how to access and complete evaluation forms

2

3 of 29

Performance Based Evaluation for Certified Staff

Effective Evaluation

3

4 of 29

Why is Educator Evaluation so important?

“The growth and learning of children is the primary responsibility of those who teach in our classrooms and lead our schools. Student growth and learning can be observed and measured. Educators, in partnership with students, parents, and community, are accountable for ensuring the improvement of student achievement. Effective educator evaluation systems promote the improvement of professional practice resulting in the improvement of student performance.” Missouri Code of State Regulations 5 CSR 20-400.375

4

5 of 29

5

6 of 29

Performance Based Evaluation for Certified Staff

Understanding FFSD Policy

6

7 of 29

Policy 1091

7

8 of 29

8

9 of 29

9

10 of 29

Performance Based Evaluation for Certified Staff

Using Missouri’s Educator Evaluation System

(MEES)

10

11 of 29

11

PDP

12 of 29

13 of 29

13

14 of 29

Teacher Forms in Perform Enterprise

  • Educator Observations
  • Professional Development Plan
  • Student Learning Objectives
  • Summative (includes Student Growth Measures and Student Surveys)

14

15 of 29

Observations- 50% of Summative

15

16 of 29

Evaluation Timeline

16

17 of 29

Professional Development Plan

10% Teachers/25% Librarians

Identify an indicator from the Growth Guide and Describe why this indicator was selected.

  1. Determine a FOCUS based on data from the Growth Guide
  2. Set a GOAL
  3. Select/Describe the STRATEGY you will use to obtain the goal- submit for approval
  4. Evaluator enters baseline data and provides feedback
  5. Observations and Feedback during implementation time
  6. Educator reports RESULTS- submit final
  7. Final score based on final observation indicator

17

18 of 29

Professional Development Plan

10% Teachers/25% Librarians

18

19 of 29

Student Growth Measures

30% Teachers

19

20 of 29

Student Learning Objectives

  1. Baseline and Trend Data- why this SLO?
  2. Describe student population
  3. Enter interval of instruction
  4. Describe Standards and Content
  5. Select assessment to be used to measure growth
  6. Determine Growth Target
  7. Rationale for Growth Target
  8. Submit for approval
  9. Teach and monitor student learning
  10. Report outcomes- submit final
  11. Scoring based on final % of students meeting target

20

44% or less- (1) Emerging

45-69%- (2) Developing

70-84%- (3) Proficient

85-100% (4) Distinguished

21 of 29

Student Learning Objectives

21

22 of 29

Student Surveys

  • 10% for Teachers
  • 25% for Librarians

22

23 of 29

Summative

  • Every 3 years for tenure staff
  • Every year for probationary staff

Teachers

50% Observation data

20% PDP/Student Surveys

30% Student Growth Measures

Counselors and Librarians

50% observation data

50% PDP/Student Surveys

23

24 of 29

How to Access Your Evaluation Plan

25 of 29

Logging in to Perform Enterprise

25

26 of 29

Accessing the Evaluation Plan

26

27 of 29

Timeline for Evaluation Process

  • PDP steps 1-3 Due Sept. 30th
  • SLO’s should be completed by January 30th
  • Student Surveys completed by January 30th
  • PDP Results and final scoring February 15th for Probationary, April 15th for Tenured.

27

28 of 29

Summative Evaluations

  • All probationary summative evaluations- Due March 1st
  • All tenure summative evaluations- Due May 15th

28

29 of 29